[RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Hi Michael,

> No, the check is not useful.  "call foo(10)" has nothing
> to do with malloc.

We've been through this.

How do you know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc"?
What is the source of your knowledge?

I know that "call foo(10) does not use malloc" because:

  . I inspected the code
  . I ran callfwmall.exp and it PASSed that test.

> Um -- Michael, did you get those two mixed up?

No.

Michael