[RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Fernando Nasser fnasser@cygnus.com
Wed Feb 14 09:02:00 GMT 2001


Sounds reasonable.  Check it in (assuming you have already added yourself to the write after approval list).

Fernando

Keith Seitz wrote:
> 
> (let me try to get the right mailing list this time :-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The problem: When doing an inferior function call with a
> struct/array/string argument (aka 'print foo({2,1})' or 'print
> foo("bar")', gdb requires "malloc" in the executable... This leads to
> some trivial testsuite failures.
> 
> 2001-02-13  Keith Seitz  <kseitz@nwlink.com>
> 
>         * gdb.base/callfwmall.exp: Check for the existence of
>         malloc.
>         (do_function_calls): Do not do an inferior function
>         call which requires malloc if malloc doesn't exist.
> 
> Patch:
> Index: testsuite/gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfwmall.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.3
> diff -p -r1.1.1.3 callfwmall.exp
> *** testsuite/gdb.base/callfwmall.exp   1999/09/09 00:00:21     1.1.1.3
> --- testsuite/gdb.base/callfwmall.exp   2001/02/14 01:11:52
> *************** proc set_lang_c {} {
> *** 99,105 ****
>   proc do_function_calls {} {
>       global prototypes
>       global gcc_compiled
> !     global gdb_prompt
> 
>       # We need to up this because this can be really slow on some boards.
>       set timeout 60;
> --- 99,105 ----
>   proc do_function_calls {} {
>       global prototypes
>       global gcc_compiled
> !     global gdb_prompt have_malloc_p
> 
>       # We need to up this because this can be really slow on some boards.
>       set timeout 60;
> *************** proc do_function_calls {} {
> *** 169,183 ****
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val2,string_val1)" " = 0"
>       gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val1,string_val2)" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_string_values(\"string 1\",\"string 2\")" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_string_values(\"string 1\",string_val2)" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val1,\"string 2\")" " = 1"
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val2,char_array_val1)" " = 0"
>       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val1,char_array_val2)" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(\"carray 1\",\"carray 2\")" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(\"carray 1\",char_array_val2)" " = 1"
> !     gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val1,\"carray 2\")" " = 1"
> 
>       gdb_test "p doubleit(4)" " = 8"
>       gdb_test "p add(4,5)" " = 9"
> --- 169,187 ----
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val2,string_val1)" " = 0"
>       gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val1,string_val2)" " = 1"
> !     if {$have_malloc_p} {
> !       gdb_test "p t_string_values(\"string 1\",\"string 2\")" " = 1"
> !       gdb_test "p t_string_values(\"string 1\",string_val2)" " = 1"
> !       gdb_test "p t_string_values(string_val1,\"string 2\")" " = 1"
> !     }
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val2,char_array_val1)" " = 0"
>       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val1,char_array_val2)" " = 1"
> !     if {$have_malloc_p} {
> !       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(\"carray 1\",\"carray 2\")" " = 1"
> !       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(\"carray 1\",char_array_val2)" " = 1"
> !       gdb_test "p t_char_array_values(char_array_val1,\"carray 2\")" " = 1"
> !     }
> 
>       gdb_test "p doubleit(4)" " = 8"
>       gdb_test "p add(4,5)" " = 9"
> *************** proc do_function_calls {} {
> *** 222,231 ****
>       gdb_test "p t_enum_value2(enum_val2)" " = 1"
>       gdb_test "p t_enum_value2(enum_val1)" " = 0"
> 
> !     gdb_test "p sum_args(1,{2})" " = 2"
> !     gdb_test "p sum_args(2,{2,3})" " = 5"
> !     gdb_test "p sum_args(3,{2,3,4})" " = 9"
> !     gdb_test "p sum_args(4,{2,3,4,5})" " = 14"
>       gdb_test "p sum10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)" " = 55"
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_structs_c(struct_val1)" "= 120 'x'" \
> --- 226,237 ----
>       gdb_test "p t_enum_value2(enum_val2)" " = 1"
>       gdb_test "p t_enum_value2(enum_val1)" " = 0"
> 
> !     if {$have_malloc_p} {
> !       gdb_test "p sum_args(1,{2})" " = 2"
> !       gdb_test "p sum_args(2,{2,3})" " = 5"
> !       gdb_test "p sum_args(3,{2,3,4})" " = 9"
> !       gdb_test "p sum_args(4,{2,3,4,5})" " = 14"
> !     }
>       gdb_test "p sum10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)" " = 55"
> 
>       gdb_test "p t_structs_c(struct_val1)" "= 120 'x'" \
> *************** gdb_load ${binfile}
> *** 255,260 ****
> --- 261,273 ----
>   gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" ""
>   gdb_test "set print address off" ""
>   gdb_test "set width 0" ""
> +
> + # Note whether malloc exists
> + set have_malloc_p 1
> + send_gdb "p malloc\n"
> + gdb_expect {
> +   "No symbol \"malloc\""  { set have_malloc_p 0 }
> + }
> 
>   if { $hp_aCC_compiler } {
>       # Do not set language explicitly to 'C'.  This will cause aCC

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list