[RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Thu Dec 13 15:11:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> OK. I'd like to see that patch when it's ready.
> Do you use only lwp's, or do you use glibc/libpthread threads?
> If you use library threads, are you saving their info in the
> core file, or are you only saving the info for the lwp's?
It's completely thread-package-agnostic. I dump all LWPs sharing the
same VM, as a fairly reliable marker (I'd use 2.4 threadgroups, but
LinuxThreads doesn't use them...)
So there is enough information there for lin-lwp to parse the threads,
if we stubbed out its attempts to write, I expect. But since the
current Linux threads model has one thread per process, I can simply
use the corefile.c thread support instead, which I'd rather do.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list