What is on the 5.1 branch; Was: [rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Tue Aug 21 06:53:00 GMT 2001
> Frankly, for quite some time I'm confused by the RFC's and RFA's
> posted here. Are they all meant to go to the branch as well as the
> trunk? If so, is it wise to make such changes after cutting the
> release branch?
As far as I know most of the patches going past at the moment are not
going onto the branch(1). Hmm, quick check, I've attached a copy of the
5.1 ChangeLog.
This current thread/patch, however is interesting, I was not thinking of
it as something for the 5.1 branch, but, yes, it probably is.
> Perhaps in the future each patch could tell explicitly whether it is
> meant ffor the branch or not, to prevent confusion.
I've been using the prefix [.../5.1] for anything 5.1 related.
enjoy, (I hope this helps)
Andrew
Now to try to get http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/ ==
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/ .
(1) For me it is stuff like overhalling the floating-point code; fixing
some nasty true multi-arch initialization problems; more MI and LIBGDB
cleanup; more multi-arch; ...
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list