[rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 17:03:52 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> > I think the ``real bug'' is that the updated read_register_bytes() can
> > leave part of the buffer undefined.  I'm thinking of either changing
> > things to:
> > 
> >     o    initializing the gaps from
> >         the regcache (restoring old
> >         behavour)
> 
> 
> The attached patch implements this.  Thoughts?

Frankly, for quite some time I'm confused by the RFC's and RFA's
posted here.  Are they all meant to go to the branch as well as the
trunk?  If so, is it wise to make such changes after cutting the
release branch?

Perhaps in the future each patch could tell explicitly whether it is
meant ffor the branch or not, to prevent confusion.