[PATCH]: C++ mangling patch that is about to be committed

[Kevin Buettner]

On Oct 10,  2:01pm, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> I really resent the implication.
> I split the patches and did modifications based on the existing set of
> patches, which is why the patch has it.

My apologies then.  But I suggest you be more careful about what you
send to the list in the future.  It is rather disconcerting to warn
you about a problem (which you say you've fixed in your version of the
sources) only to see it show up in later patches again (and again).

Kevin