[PATCH] in_prologue() fix #2
Elena Zannoni
ezannoni@cygnus.com
Wed May 3 06:46:00 GMT 2000
Jim Blandy writes:
>
> > This patch supercedes the one in:
> > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00456.html
> >
> > This is a rewrite of in_prologue(). Jim is the real author of this
> > patch, I have tested it on d10v (solves the original problem),
> > solaris/sparc, linux/i386 w/ no regressions in the testsuite.
> >
> > I'll check this in tomorrow, if there are no objections.
> > Elena
> >
> > Tue May 2 13:17:21 2000 Elena Zannoni (ezannoni@makita.cygnus.com)
> >
> > * symtab.c (in_prologue): From Jim Blandy. Rewrite, more
> > intelligently, making sure we use the information from the
> > symbol tables fully.
>
> This patch sucks! What kind of bozo coding is this?
>
> (approved)
Yeah, I don't know. Sometimes people have just no clue.
Checked in.
Elena
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list