gdb-5.0/gdb/doc/ patch -- is this patch really correct?

Eli Zaretskii
Fri Jun 30 11:35:00 GMT 2000

> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:07:09 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <>
>    Hmm...  This isn't right, the CVS reporitory should IMHO reproduce the
>    contents of the distribution tarball.
> Certainly not.  Developers are supposed to have the necessary tools
> installed.  The distribution tarball is typically created by `make
> dist' which should regenerate all generated files.

Then how can we be sure that any given change won't break something in
maintainer's setup, exactly like it happened for Chris here?  I only
test my changes in an end-user setup, that is with all the files
created by "make dist" present, as if I just unpacked a source

Do we need a procedure and someone responsible to verify that each
change works both for maintainers and end users?

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list