gdb-5.0/gdb/doc/Makefile.in patch -- is this patch really correct?
Fri Jun 30 11:35:00 GMT 2000
> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:07:09 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Hmm... This isn't right, the CVS reporitory should IMHO reproduce the
> contents of the distribution tarball.
> Certainly not. Developers are supposed to have the necessary tools
> installed. The distribution tarball is typically created by `make
> dist' which should regenerate all generated files.
Then how can we be sure that any given change won't break something in
maintainer's setup, exactly like it happened for Chris here? I only
test my changes in an end-user setup, that is with all the files
created by "make dist" present, as if I just unpacked a source
Do we need a procedure and someone responsible to verify that each
change works both for maintainers and end users?
More information about the Gdb-patches