RFA: Separate i386 embed targets configuration

Fernando Nasser fnasser@cygnus.com
Fri Jun 9 15:48:00 GMT 2000

Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 17:36:51 +0000
>    From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>
>    "J.T. Conklin" wrote:
>    >
>    > I suggested a i386/tm-embed.h some months ago.  I didn't really have
>    > anything to put in it at the time, it was more for the clarification
>    > of a separate target config would bring than for anything else.  As I
>    > remember, the change was neither accepted or rejected.  I put it into
>    > our repository and forgot about it.
> [snip]
>    > What does your tm-embed.h file look like?
>    >
>    The initial version, like yours, just includes tm-i386v.h.  But I have in
>    my sandbox a few entries which I plan to submit in the future.
> Fernando, go ahead and check in the patch, together with your
> tm-embed.h that hust includes tm-i386v.h (we want to keep those
> targets building :-)).
Thanks ark.  Sure, I will keep it equivalent to what is today.
Any change to that will be submitted for approval in the usual ways.

> However, do i386-elf, i386-coff and i386-aout really have something to
> do with System V?  If not, it might be worth considering to include
> tm-i386.h instead of tm-i386v.h from your new tm-embed.h once you
> start modifying it.

That is a good point.  I will take a look at what could possibly be useful
from the Sys V file.  Including it doesn't look right.  If one or two 
macros are being used we may consider copying them.

Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@cygnus.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300           Tel:  416-482-2661 ext. 311
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9              Fax:  416-482-6299

More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list