[PATCH RFC] PARAMS elimination - phase 2
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Thu Jun 1 01:29:00 GMT 2000
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> On May 31, 5:59pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > As an asside, the indent that was used had a bug with how it formatted
> > structs. It would format them as either
> >
> > struct x
> > {
> > int i;
> > };
> >
> > struct x
> > {
> > int i;
> > };
>
> Which form is preferred?
What ever emacs does. Trying 19.34:
struct s
{
int i;
union u
{
int i;
int j;
}
u;
};
and given:
struct s { int i; union u { int i; int j; } u; };
cagney@b1.cygnus.com$ /usr/local/bin/indent-1.9.1 < x.c
struct s
{
int i;
union u
{
int i;
int j;
}
u;
};
cagney@b1.cygnus.com$ /usr/local/bin/indent-2.2.5 < x.c
struct s
{
int i;
union u
{
int i;
int j;
}
u;
};
so the latter.
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list