(patch) hpjyg02: fix gdb.base/commands.exp
Jimmy Guo
guo@cup.hp.com
Thu Oct 28 17:45:00 GMT 1999
We need a $gdb_prompt $ anchor for 'continue with watch' test in
gdb.base/commands.exp, or the anchor could be picked up by the next
expect ...
- Jimmy Guo
Index: gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
/opt/gnu/bin/diff -r -c -N -L gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog@@/GDB_1999_10_25 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
*** gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
--- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog Thu Oct 28 17:40:25 1999
***************
*** 1,3 ****
--- 1,14 ----
+ 1999-10-28 Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com>
+
+ * gdb.base/commands.exp: add '$gdb_prompt $' anchor to
+ 'continue with watch' test point.
+
+ 1999-10-28 Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com>
+
+ * gdb.base/annota1.c, gdb.base/annota1.exp: add test to check
+ that breakpoint ignore count changes are annotated but only once
+ for successive ignore count changes.
+
1999-10-18 Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
* gdb.threads/linux-dp.c, gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp: New test suite
Index: gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
/opt/gnu/bin/diff -r -c -N -L gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp@@/GDB_1999_10_25 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
*** gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp Thu Oct 28 15:09:54 1999
***************
*** 320,326 ****
}
send_gdb "continue\n"
gdb_expect {
! -re "Continuing.*\[Ww\]atchpoint $wp_id deleted because the program has left the block in.*which its expression is valid.*run.c:57.*"\
{pass "continue with watch"}
-re "$gdb_prompt $"\
{fail "continue with watch"}
--- 320,326 ----
}
send_gdb "continue\n"
gdb_expect {
! -re "Continuing.*\[Ww\]atchpoint $wp_id deleted because the program has left the block in.*which its expression is valid.*run.c:57.*$gdb_prompt $"\
{pass "continue with watch"}
-re "$gdb_prompt $"\
{fail "continue with watch"}
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list