Unifying i387 support

Mark Kettenis kettenis@wins.uva.nl
Fri Jul 9 03:10:00 GMT 1999


   From: Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>
   Date: 09 Jul 1999 02:08:48 -0500

   So, something like:

   #define REGISTER_NAMES { "eax",  "ecx",  "edx",  "ebx",  \
			    "esp",  "ebp",  "esi",  "edi",  \
			    "eip",  "eflags","cs",  "ss",   \
			    "ds",   "es",   "fs",   "gs",   \
			    "fctrl","fstat","ftag", "fioff",\
			    "fiseg","fop",  "fdoff","fdseg",\
			    "st",   "st1",  "st2",  "st3",  \
			    "st4",  "st5",  "st6",  "st7",}

Why "st" instead of "st0"?

Mark


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list