Fortran array patches

[Stan Shebs]

andy@maxwell.la.asu.edu (Andy Vaught) writes:

> Of course, only after the patch has actually been *sent* does an alternate
> explanation occur-- g77 may be at fault!  Running gdb on AIX works fine,
> so it looks like g77 is the one that is backwards....

Yes, this particular convention was set up for the benefit of other
Fortran compilers.  Craig Burley keeps saying that g77's debug info
generation needs a bunch of work, and not to worry about what GDB
makes of it yet.  So if this is important to you, you might want to
consider delving into g77 a bit.

							Stan