[binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp on native-gdbserver
Tom de Vries
vries@sourceware.org
Thu Mar 9 11:56:20 GMT 2023
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f2be4eeb6ce93e4dfab259587bcaf5cb861fc25b
commit f2be4eeb6ce93e4dfab259587bcaf5cb861fc25b
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Thu Mar 9 12:56:27 2023 +0100
[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp on native-gdbserver
With test-case gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp and target board
native-gdbserver I run into:
...
(gdb) continue^M
Continuing.^M
[New Thread 758.759]^M
^M
Thread 1 "multiple-succes" hit Breakpoint 2, main () at \
multiple-successive-infcall.c:97^M
97 thread_ids[tid] = tid + 2; /* prethreadcreationmarker */^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp: thread=5: \
created new thread
...
The problem is that the new thread message doesn't match the regexp, which
expects something like this instead:
...
[New Thread 0x7ffff746e700 (LWP 570)]^M
...
Fix this by accepting this form of new thread message.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Diff:
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
index f33cba62855..bd037a02674 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/multiple-successive-infcall.exp
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ foreach_with_prefix thread {5 4 3} {
-re "\\\[New Thread ${hex} \\\(LWP \[0-9\]+\\\)\\\].*${gdb_prompt}" {
pass "${after_new_thread_message}"
}
+ -re -wrap "\\\[New Thread $decimal\\.$decimal\\\]\r\n.*" {
+ pass $gdb_test_name
+ }
}
}
More information about the Gdb-cvs
mailing list