[binutils-gdb] Fix gdb.ada/vla.exp

Tom Tromey tromey@sourceware.org
Fri Jun 14 12:56:00 GMT 2019


https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9a9e394b05a841bdd9163f280d7ef19cc65634d6

commit 9a9e394b05a841bdd9163f280d7ef19cc65634d6
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Wed May 29 10:21:52 2019 -0600

    Fix gdb.ada/vla.exp
    
    PR ada/24539 concerns a test failure in gdb.ada/vla.exp.
    
    The problem here is that different versions of Gnat emit the
    structure's fields in different orders -- with the order currently
    failing actually being the correct one.
    
    Joel pointed out that this can be fixed by simply adding the
    No_Component_Reordering pragma to the type in question, which is what
    this patch does.
    
    I've reported a Gnat compiler bug internally in hopes of getting the
    underlying problem fixed.
    
    gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
    2019-06-14  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>
    
    	PR ada/24539:
    	* gdb.ada/vla.exp: Update tests.
    	* gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb (Record_Type): Use No_Component_Reordering
    	pragma.

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog           | 7 +++++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla.exp     | 8 ++++----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 37e327d..bd48c92 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2019-06-14  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+	PR ada/24539:
+	* gdb.ada/vla.exp: Update tests.
+	* gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb (Record_Type): Use No_Component_Reordering
+	pragma.
+
 2019-06-13  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
 
 	* gdb.base/settings.exp (test-integer): Test junk after
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla.exp
index 7e10e9b..c03d1cc 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla.exp
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ set bp_location [gdb_get_line_number "Set breakpoint here" ${testdir}/vla.adb]
 runto "vla.adb:$bp_location"
 
 gdb_test "print r00" \
-         "= \\(l1 => 0, l2 => 0, i1 => 1, i2 => 2, i3 => 3, a1 => \\(\\), a2 => \\(\\)\\)"
+         "= \\(l1 => 0, l2 => 0, i1 => 1, a1 => \\(\\), i2 => 2, a2 => \\(\\), i3 => 3\\)"
 gdb_test "print r01" \
-         "= \\(l1 => 0, l2 => 1, i1 => 1, i2 => 2, i3 => 3, a1 => \\(\\), a2 => \\(20\\)\\)"
+         "= \\(l1 => 0, l2 => 1, i1 => 1, a1 => \\(\\), i2 => 2, a2 => \\(20\\), i3 => 3\\)"
 gdb_test "print r10" \
-         "= \\(l1 => 1, l2 => 0, i1 => 1, i2 => 2, i3 => 3, a1 => \\(10\\), a2 => \\(\\)\\)"
+         "= \\(l1 => 1, l2 => 0, i1 => 1, a1 => \\(10\\), i2 => 2, a2 => \\(\\), i3 => 3\\)"
 gdb_test "print r22" \
-         "= \\(l1 => 2, l2 => 2, i1 => 1, i2 => 2, i3 => 3, a1 => \\(10, 10\\), a2 => \\(20, 20\\)\\)"
+         "= \\(l1 => 2, l2 => 2, i1 => 1, a1 => \\(10, 10\\), i2 => 2, a2 => \\(20, 20\\), i3 => 3\\)"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb
index 2b6cc8a..1986fb1 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/vla/vla.adb
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ procedure Vla is
       I3 : Integer;
    end record;
 
+   -- Some versions of GCC emit the members in the incorrect order.
+   -- Since this isn't relevant to the bug at hand, disable
+   -- reordering to get consistent results.
+   pragma No_Component_Reordering (Record_Type);
+
    procedure Process (R : Record_Type) is
    begin
       null;



More information about the Gdb-cvs mailing list