[PATCH] coroutines: Update TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS on inserted bind exprs.
Iain Sandoe
iain@sandoe.co.uk
Fri May 8 09:53:03 GMT 2020
Hi,
There are several places where we insert bind expressions while
making the coroutine AST transforms. These should be marked as
having side-effects where relevant, which had been omitted. This
leads to at least one failure in the cppcoros test suite, where a loop
body is dropped in gimplification because it is not marked.
tested so far on x86-64-darwin16,
OK if it passes on Linux too, for master, 10.2?
thanks
Iain
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-05-08 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/95003
* coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Ensure that bind scopes
are marked as having side-effects where necessary.
(replace_statement_captures): Likewise.
(morph_fn_to_coro): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-05-08 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/95003
* g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 15 ++++--
.../g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
index 8f0f2d5960d..730e6fef82a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
@@ -1973,8 +1973,6 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
current_stmt_tree ()->stmts_are_full_exprs_p = 1;
tree stmt = begin_compound_stmt (BCS_FN_BODY);
- /* ??? Can we dispense with the enclosing bind if the function body does
- not start with a bind_expr? (i.e. there's no contained scopes). */
tree actor_bind = build3 (BIND_EXPR, void_type_node, NULL, NULL, NULL);
tree top_block = make_node (BLOCK);
BIND_EXPR_BLOCK (actor_bind) = top_block;
@@ -2425,8 +2423,8 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
continue_label, continuation, 2};
cp_walk_tree (&actor_body, await_statement_expander, &data, NULL);
- actor_body = pop_stmt_list (actor_body);
- BIND_EXPR_BODY (actor_bind) = actor_body;
+ BIND_EXPR_BODY (actor_bind) = pop_stmt_list (actor_body);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (actor_bind) = true;
finish_compound_stmt (stmt);
DECL_SAVED_TREE (actor) = pop_stmt_list (actor_outer);
@@ -2891,6 +2889,7 @@ replace_statement_captures (tree *stmt, void *d)
}
}
BIND_EXPR_BLOCK (aw_bind) = b_block;
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (aw_bind) = TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (BIND_EXPR_BODY (aw_bind));
*stmt = aw_bind;
}
@@ -3613,10 +3612,13 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
{
tree tlist = NULL_TREE;
append_to_statement_list_force (fnbody, &tlist);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (tlist) = TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (fnbody);
BIND_EXPR_BODY (update_body) = tlist;
}
tree new_body_list = NULL_TREE;
- append_to_statement_list_force (update_body, &new_body_list);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (update_body) = true;
+ append_to_statement_list (update_body, &new_body_list);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (new_body_list) = true;
fnbody = new_body_list;
}
@@ -4323,7 +4325,9 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
/* Finish up the ramp function. */
BIND_EXPR_VARS (gro_context_bind) = gro_bind_vars;
BIND_EXPR_BODY (gro_context_bind) = pop_stmt_list (gro_context_body);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (gro_context_bind) = true;
BIND_EXPR_BODY (ramp_bind) = pop_stmt_list (ramp_body);
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (ramp_bind) = true;
/* We know the "real" promise and have a frame layout with a slot for each
suspend point, so we can build an actor function (which contains the
@@ -4442,6 +4446,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
BLOCK_SUPERCONTEXT (replace_blk) = tcb_block;
BLOCK_SUBBLOCKS (tcb_block) = replace_blk;
BIND_EXPR_BLOCK (fnbody) = tcb_block;
+ TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (fnbody) = true;
}
}
else if (pedantic)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..eda785827ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr95003.C
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// { dg-do run }
+
+#include "../coro.h"
+#include "../coro1-ret-int-yield-int.h"
+
+// This tests that, when we insert bind scopes to contain variables that
+// have been promoted from compiler temporaries to extend their lifetimes
+// to a containing full expression, the inserted bind scopes have their
+// tree-side-effects set.
+
+struct Awaitable {
+ int v;
+ Awaitable (int _v) : v(_v) {}
+ bool await_ready() { return false; }
+ void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<coro1::promise_type>) {}
+ int await_resume() { return v; }
+ auto operator co_await() { return *this; }
+};
+
+coro1
+my_coro
+(int x)
+{
+ int sum = 0;
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
+ sum += co_await Awaitable{x+1};
+ }
+ co_return sum;
+}
+
+int main ()
+{
+ PRINT ("main: create coro1");
+ struct coro1 f_coro = my_coro (0);
+
+ PRINT ("main: OK -- looping");
+
+ do {
+ f_coro.handle.resume();
+ } while (!f_coro.handle.done());
+
+ int y = f_coro.handle.promise().get_value();
+ if (y != 100)
+ {
+ PRINTF ("main: y is wrong : %d, should be 100\n", y);
+ abort ();
+ }
+ puts ("main: done");
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.24.1
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list