[C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Tue Mar 29 15:53:00 GMT 2011
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Rodrigo Rivas
<rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we consistently refer to %<for%> so the keyword is highlighted?
> Now that you say... I've not been quite consistent. We could say
> "range-based %<for%>", with only a dash between 'range' and 'based'.
>
or "new-style for loop"?
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list