PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/47502: Never combine asm statement

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 00:35:00 GMT 2011


Hi Eric,

Is this patch OK for trunk?

Thanks.


H.J.
---
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
> It is a bad idea to combine asm statement.  This patch disallows it.
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> H.J.
> ---
> commit a11b95180e53d3a0bc3eabad5594859cea7c3334
> Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu Jan 27 18:12:27 2011 -0800
>
>    Never combine asm statement.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.x32 b/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
> index 0ae4761..ef65e7b 100644
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.x32
> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> +2011-01-27  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> +
> +       PR rtl-optimization/47502
> +       * combine.c (cant_combine_insn_p): Never combine asm statement.
> +
>  2011-01-25  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
>        PR target/47446
> diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
> index 3ee53e6..d4a8079 100644
> --- a/gcc/combine.c
> +++ b/gcc/combine.c
> @@ -2122,13 +2122,14 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx insn)
>   /* Never combine loads and stores involving hard regs that are likely
>      to be spilled.  The register allocator can usually handle such
>      reg-reg moves by tying.  If we allow the combiner to make
> -     substitutions of likely-spilled regs, reload might die.
> +     substitutions of likely-spilled regs, reload might die.  Never
> +     combine asm statement.
>      As an exception, we allow combinations involving fixed regs; these are
>      not available to the register allocator so there's no risk involved.  */
>
>   set = single_set (insn);
>   if (! set)
> -    return 0;
> +    return asm_noperands (PATTERN (insn)) > 0;
>   src = SET_SRC (set);
>   dest = SET_DEST (set);
>   if (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG)
> @@ -2144,7 +2145,7 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (rtx insn)
>              && targetm.class_likely_spilled_p (REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (dest))))))
>     return 1;
>
> -  return 0;
> +  return asm_noperands (src) > 0;
>  }
>
>  struct likely_spilled_retval_info
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32 b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
> index 597294e..8759881 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.x32
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +2011-01-27  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> +
> +       PR rtl-optimization/47502
> +       * gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c: New.
> +       * gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c: Likewise.
> +
>  2011-01-25  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
>        PR target/47446
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..727afe9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O" } */
> +
> +void
> +foo (const void *xxxxx, void *yyyyy, long y)
> +{
> +  asm volatile ("" :: "c" ((xxxxx)), "d" ((yyyyy)), "S" (y));
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1f57ea0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +int
> +foo (int how, const void *set, void *oset)
> +{
> +  int resultvar;
> +  asm volatile (""
> +                : "=a" (resultvar)
> +                : "0" (14) , "b" (how), "c" ((set)), "d" ((oset)), "S" (65 / 8) : "memory", "cc");
> +  return resultvar;
> +}
>



-- 
H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list