PR debug/47510

[Dodji Seketeli]

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:

> This patch is OK.

Thank you.

Would the RMs (in CC) object to this patch going into 4.6?

> I also think it's a bug that the constructors of the anonymous struct
> have 't' in their names; they should also be anonymous with
> DW_AT_linkage_name.

I think this makes sense.  Tom, Jan, would this be good enough from a
debug info consumer point of view?  If yes I'll propose a separate patch
for this a bit later.

--
		Dodji