[2/2] Reducing the overhead of dwarf2 location tracking
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 14:30:00 GMT 2011
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@linaro.org> wrote:
> Suppose we have a function F that is inlined several times. Suppose too
> that F has a local variable X, and that no "real" (as opposed to debug)
> references to X remain after pre-inlining optimisations. In this case,
> we will add X to BLOCK_NONLOCALIZED_VARS rather than duplicate it each
> time F is inlined. Location notes for each inlining of F will then
> refer to the same non-localised X decl. This in turn means that each
> inlining of F has the same location list for X, with the list specifying
> the location of X for all inlinings of F.
>
> Jakub confirms that this indeed the intended behaviour, and I haven't
> seen any problem with the output.
Hm, but isn't it incorrect debug info? I would have expected this
non-localized var to be the abstract origin of a copy for location
list purposes.
Well, for
static inline int foo (int p) { int q = p; return q; }
int bar1 (int i)
{
return foo (i);
}
int bar2 (int j)
{
return foo (j);
}
I don't even see location lists for q, but maybe I'm blind ;)
Richard.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list