Call for testers / comments: Overhaul SH pragmas (pr14798)

[Kaz Kojima]

Joern RENNECKE <joern.rennecke@st.com> wrote:
> The basic idea of this patch is that pragmas should not store 
> information in static
> variables - they should add attributes instead.  Likewise, attribute 
> processing
> should not stash away information in static variables where it can get 
> confused
> when processing nested functions and/or deferred functions.

Although I know that you've posted the revised patch, this passes
bootstrap on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu and the top level "make -k check"
with no new failures on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu and i686-linux cross
sh64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Regards,
	kaz