fcore status

[Yong Zheng]

> I was hoping that the Isa factory based abstraction would already help 
> here. OTOH, I like the idea you proposed here though I am wary of 
> building factories (ours) on top of ISA's own.  However it really 
> cleanly cuts the code up into arch dependent parts within the FCore 
> code. So I agree we should go ahead and implement it down the line.
> 
> What I am doing today/this week is exposing the notes section to the 
> core file. First thing I'll have to do is expose the notes structures to 
> the Java bindings of Libelf, then build on the population of those 
> structures. So I'll think on this some more during that time ;)
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 

Phil, when I try to construct prpsinfo, there's no any definition in
elfutils package. So I have to use <linux/elfcore.h> for java binding.
And at the sametime, I refactor the arch-dependent code on CORE dumping
again in order to dump out prpsinfo more easily. I just write some
source codes now and post them out for comments from anybody who is
interested in this. 

Looking forward to your commends.

Best regards.
Yong Zheng
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fcore-experimental-1017.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 28702 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/frysk/attachments/20061018/44cc4353/attachment.bin>