From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 09:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3763] testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: section-1-alignment expected:<0> but was:<4> on x86_64
In-Reply-To: <20061219125759.3763.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20061219125759.3763.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070102093843.7393.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-02 09:38 -------
Created an attachment (id=1472)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1472&action=view)
alignment info for Elf test

This adds the allignment info to the test.
This works well on x86_64, but not on x86 where the read data always seems to
come out as zero.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3763

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 09:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] New: kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
Message-ID: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>

Running make check in frysk-imports generates the following kernel message on my
FC6 machine (Linux hermans.wildebeest.org 2.6.18-1.2868.fc6 #1 SMP Fri Dec 15
17:32:54 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux):

Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201!
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: SMP
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: last sysfs file:
/class/net/sit0/statistics/collisions
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Modules linked in: i915 drm autofs4
cpufreq_ondemand video sbs ibm_acpi i2c_ec dock button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6
parport_pc
lp parport snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec joydev snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss
snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device sg snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm
snd_timer e1000 i2c_i801 serio_raw snd i2c_core ide_cd pcspkr cdrom soundcore
snd_page_alloc dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror dm_mod ahci libata sd_mod scsi_mod
ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: CPU:    1
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: EIP:    0060:[<c045164b>]    Not tainted VLI
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: EFLAGS: 00210202   (2.6.18-1.2868.fc6 #1)
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: EIP is at check_dead_utrace+0x3b/0xe0
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: eax: 00000020   ebx: f733f200   ecx: 00000000
edx: 00000008
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: esi: f16d3440   edi: 00000000   ebp: f16d3440
esp: f1a6fe14
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Process threadexec (pid: 2956, ti=f1a6f000
task=f733f200 task.ti=f1a6f000)
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Stack: f16d3448 f16d3448 00000000 f16d3440
c0451741 f1a6fe5c f733f200 f16d3448
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:        00000020 00000020 f733f200 c0452817
00000020 00000000 00200246 f1b21878
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:        f1b21840 f16d2440 f16d3440 00000010
f16d3440 f733f200 f6c283f0 c0427d19
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Call Trace:
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0451741>] remove_detached+0x51/0x74
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0452817>] utrace_report_death+0x1d0/0x205
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0427d19>] do_exit+0x6fc/0x776
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0427e09>] sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<f1a6ff94>] 0xf1a6ff94
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xf1a6ff94
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Leftover inexact backtrace:
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c061542d>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x4db
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0430808>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x38b/0x3b3
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0430005>] specific_send_sig_info+0x8e/0x99
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c061542d>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x4db
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0403626>] do_notify_resume+0x7e/0x6c1
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c041c9ca>] force_sig_info_fault+0x24/0x28
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0614616>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x5/0x7
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0451945>] utrace_quiescent+0xc2/0x1d5
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0452ed1>] utrace_report_syscall+0x171/0x190
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c0615900>] do_page_fault+0x4d3/0x4db
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c061542d>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x4db
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  [<c04040a2>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x19
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  =======================
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: Code: 7a 04 00 8b 93 a4 04 00 00 0f 45 f8 89 f8
83 e2 08 f7 d0 85 d0 74 69 8b 83 90 00 00 00 85 c0 74 5f 83 3e 00 75 5a 83 f8 10
74 08 <0f> 0b c9 00 70 7f 63 c0 c7 06 01 00 00 00 83 bb 98 00 00 00 ff
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel: EIP: [<c045164b>] check_dead_utrace+0x3b/0xe0
SS:ESP 0068:f1a6fe14
Jan  2 10:43:48 hermans kernel:  <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!

-- 
           Summary: kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in
                    frysk-imports
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: roland at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 16:04:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:04:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3821] New: New DOMSources are being generated for each StackFrame
Message-ID: <20070102160400.3821.mcvet@redhat.com>

All of the frames in the test program have source in the same file, however:

do_it frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d480
start_thread frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d478
clone frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d470
bak frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d400
baz frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d390
bar frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d320
foo frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d2b0
main frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d240
__libc_start_main frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d238
_start frysk.dom.DOMSource@101d230

-- 
           Summary: New DOMSources are being generated for each StackFrame
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,rmoseley at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3821

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 16:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3821] New DOMSources are being generated for each StackFrame
In-Reply-To: <20070102160400.3821.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070102160400.3821.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070102160804.20595.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-02 16:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=1473)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1473&action=view)
Test source


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3821

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 16:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3822] New: TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
Message-ID: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>

Occassionally when running TestFStack with FINEST output I get the error (during
teardown):
Note that testStressMultiThreaded was changed to have 20 clones instead of just 7.

There was 1 error:
1) testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.detach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask.sendDetach(TestRunner)
   at
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached$WaitForUnblock.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Detaching.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$3.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$7.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.multiThreaded(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.StressTestFStack.testStressMultiThreadedDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner).

Log to follow.

-- 
           Summary: TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process
                    during teardown.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  2 16:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3822] TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
In-Reply-To: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070102164508.5392.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-02 16:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=1474)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1474&action=view)
Tail end of a very long log file.

This is the remainder of a log after the allExistingTasksCompleted method was
called.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan  3 05:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070103050039.26514.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-03 05:00 -------
Also happens with 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan  3 21:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3821] New DOMSources are being generated for each StackFrame
In-Reply-To: <20070102160400.3821.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070102160400.3821.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070103214416.8026.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3821

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan  3 21:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3822] TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
In-Reply-To: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070103215020.12807.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-03 21:50 -------
Seems like the process is dieing in the middle of teardown. 

Should the process be made to live longer (100 seconds as opposed to 5,
especially for debugging)

or 

Should the teardown function be modified to allow errors from dead processes to
be dropped on the floor.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan  3 22:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3296] Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 24
In-Reply-To: <20061002203502.3296.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061002203502.3296.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070103221117.3282.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-03 22:11 -------
with new option parser requires to run with.

./frysk/bindir/ftrace -- gnome-terminal --disable-factory

happens in LinuxIa32Syscall.syscallByNum at this point:

else
{
return ipcSubcallList[subSyscallNumber];
}

ipcSubcallList has 24 elements, so the 24 is looking for the 25th element.

That 24 is provided by:
subSyscallNumber = (int) task.getIsa().getRegisterByName("ebx").get (task);


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3296

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 10:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3825] New: testSingleThreadedCatch(frysk.util.TestFCatch)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
Message-ID: <20070104102812.3825.mark@klomp.org>

On 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5 x86_64 I am seeing the following failure in frysk-core:
 
testSingleThreadedCatch(frysk.util.TestFCatch)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
#0 0x3375d2f31a in __sigsuspend ()
#1 0x401819 in server () from:
../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child.c#249
#2 0x4021dd in main () from:
../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child.c#505
#3 0x3375d1c784 in __libc_start_main ()
#4 0x401249 in _start ()
should match: (#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in .*
)*#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in sigsuspend \(\)
#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in server \(\) from:
../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child.c#[\d]+
#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in main \(\) from:
../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child.c#[\d]+
#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in __libc_start_main \(\)
#[\d]+ 0x[\da-f]+ in _start \(\)

   at frysk.util.TestFCatch.testSingleThreadedCatch(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testSingleThreadedCatch(frysk.util.TestFCatch)junit.fram
                    ework.AssertionFailedError
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 10:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3825] testSingleThreadedCatch(frysk.util.TestFCatch)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
In-Reply-To: <20070104102812.3825.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070104102812.3825.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070104103220.8823.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-04 10:32 -------
Ah, it is the __ before sigsuspend, patch comming up.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 10:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3825] testSingleThreadedCatch(frysk.util.TestFCatch)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
In-Reply-To: <20070104102812.3825.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070104102812.3825.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070104103539.10596.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-04 10:35 -------
Fixed by:

2007-01-04  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>

       Fixes frysk/3825
       * TestFCatch.java (mainThread): Add optional __ before sigsuspend
       regex match.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3694] Only link Build.java into build-tree programs
In-Reply-To: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104133918.27111.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-04 13:39 -------
2007-01-04  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * Build.javain (ABS_BUILDDIR, BUILDDIR): Delete.

        * Makefile.rules (SUBST_SED): Substitute abs_root_srcdir, and
        root_srcdir.
        * TestRunner.javain: Replace Build.ABS_BUILDDIR with direct
        reference to @abs_builddir@.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3694

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3827] New: Code uses Buid.SRCDIR
Message-ID: <20070104134324.3827.cagney@redhat.com>

Installed code is using Build.SRCDIR, and shouldn't.  Instead, assuming it is
test code checking for a src path, it can use Config.getRootSrcDir.

frysk/util/TestFCatch.java:67:                      + Build.SRCDIR
frysk/util/TestFCatch.java:70:                      + Build.SRCDIR
frysk/util/TestFStack.java:83:                        + Build.SRCDIR
frysk/util/TestFStack.java:86:                        + Build.SRCDIR
frysk/util/TestFStack.java:93:                    + Build.SRCDIR +
"/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child.c#[\\d]+\n"
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:206:                        Build.SRCDIR + "/"
+ BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:214:                        "./common",
Build.SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH + "common/",
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:218:                       
"./srcwin/testfiles", Build.SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH + "srcwin/testfiles",
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:135:                        Build.SRCDIR + "/"
+ BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:143:                        "./common",
Build.SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH + "common/",
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:147:                       
"./srcwin/testfiles", Build.SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH + "srcwin/testfiles",
frysk/gui/test/TestGlade.java:87:                       Build.SRCDIR + "/" +
BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/test/TestParser.java:100:                                    
Build.SRCDIR + "/frysk/gui/srcwin/testfiles/test_looper.xml",
frysk/gui/test/TestParser.java:108:    if (DOMFactory.pathFound(Build.SRCDIR))
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:56:                  Build.SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH +
GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:64:                  "./common", Build.SRCDIR + "/" +
BASE_PATH + "common/",
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:68:                  "./srcwin/testfiles", Build.SRCDIR
+ "/" + BASE_PATH + "srcwin/testfiles",

-- 
           Summary: Code uses Buid.SRCDIR
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3694
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3827

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3694] Only link Build.java into build-tree programs
In-Reply-To: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104134324.29619.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3827


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3694

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3828] New: Code uses Build.ABS_SRCDIR
Message-ID: <20070104134712.3828.cagney@redhat.com>

If non-install files such as FryskGui, then it should refer to @abs_srcdir@
directly (well via a local variable).

Is DummySourceWindow still used?

Teset code must use a frysk.junit.Paths value as otherwize it won't work in both
build-and install trees.

frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:208:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:211:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "images/"
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:215:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "common/"
frysk/gui/DummySourceWindow.java:219:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "srcwin/testfiles"
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:137:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:140:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "images/"
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:144:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "common/"
frysk/gui/DummyDebugResults.java:148:                        Build.ABS_SRCDIR +
"/" + BASE_PATH + "srcwin/testfiles"
frysk/gui/test/TestIconManager.java:59:  String[] imagePaths = new String[] {
Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
frysk/gui/test/TestWindowFactorization.java:65:  String[] imagePaths = new
String[] { Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
frysk/gui/test/TestGlade.java:89:                       Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" +
BASE_PATH + GLADE_PKG_PATH, };
frysk/gui/test/TestGlade.java:91:    String[] imagePaths = new String[] {
Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:58:                  Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
+ GLADE_PKG_PATH,
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:61:                  Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
+ "images/"
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:65:                  Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
+ "common/"
frysk/gui/FryskGui.java:69:                  Build.ABS_SRCDIR + "/" + BASE_PATH
+ "srcwin/testfiles"

-- 
           Summary: Code uses Build.ABS_SRCDIR
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3694
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3828

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3694] Only link Build.java into build-tree programs
In-Reply-To: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104134713.31445.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3828


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3694

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3829] New: Code uses Build.BUILD_ARCH
Message-ID: <20070104135253.3829.cagney@redhat.com>

Code shouldn't be looking at the build arch, instead it should be looking at
attributes such as the word-size, or what the executable was built as (--target=
is not reliable, cf i386 vs i686).

frysk/proc/TestIsa.java:314:    if (!Build.BUILD_ARCH.equals("x86_64"))
frysk/proc/TestIsa.java:371:    if (!Build.BUILD_ARCH.equals("x86_64"))
frysk/proc/IsaFactory.java:94:          if (frysk.core.Build.BUILD_ARCH.equals
("x86_64"))
frysk/proc/IsaFactory.java:102:       if
(frysk.core.Build.BUILD_ARCH.equals("powerpc64"))
frysk/junit/TestCase.java:76:    if (Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf ("powerpc") != - 1) {
frysk/junit/TestCase.java:88:    if (Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf ("_64") != - 1) {
frysk/junit/Runner.java:273:        this.archBuild = Build.BUILD_ARCH;
frysk/junit/Runner.java:315:        this.archBuild = Build.BUILD_ARCH;
frysk/junit/Runner.java:581:    setBuildArch (Build.BUILD_ARCH);
lib/opcodes/tests/TestOpcodes.java:79:    //boolean is64 =
Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf("_64") != - 1;
lib/opcodes/tests/TestOpcodes.java:82:    if
(Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf("powerpc") != - 1)
lib/opcodes/tests/TestOpcodes.java:98:    else if
(Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf("_64") != - 1)
lib/opcodes/tests/DummyByteBuffer.java:54:    if
(Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf("powerpc") != - 1)
lib/opcodes/tests/DummyByteBuffer.java:70:    else if
(Build.BUILD_ARCH.indexOf("_64") != - 1)
bugzilla/3349.xml:51:        testRunner.setBuildArch(Build.BUILD_ARCH);
bugzilla/2712.xml:277:to replace &quot;ppc&quot; with &quot;powerpc&quot; to
match Build.BUILD_ARCH.

-- 
           Summary: Code uses Build.BUILD_ARCH
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3694
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3829

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3694] Only link Build.java into build-tree programs
In-Reply-To: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211050434.3694.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104135254.695.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3829


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3694

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 13:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104135417.1740.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3694, which changed state.

Bug 3694 Summary: Only link Build.java into build-tree programs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3694

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 14:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3692] Modify funit to use 32-bit install path from 32-bit build
In-Reply-To: <20061211042235.3692.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211042235.3692.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104140042.6539.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-04 14:00 -------
mine

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3692

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 15:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2654] [tracker] Fedora Core 6
In-Reply-To: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104151659.19081.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2654 depends on bug 3692, which changed state.

Bug 3692 Summary: Modify funit to use 32-bit install path from 32-bit build
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3692

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2654

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 15:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3692] Modify funit to use 32-bit install path from 32-bit build
In-Reply-To: <20061211042235.3692.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061211042235.3692.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104151657.19069.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-04 15:16 -------
2006-12-13  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * funit.java: Do not call Paths .setPrefixes.  Use Config
        .PKGLIB32DIR.

2006-12-12  Stepan Kasal  <skasal@redhat.com>

        * funit-child.xml: s/pkglibexecdir/pkglibdir/
        * funit-exec.xml: Ditto.
        * funit-exit.xml: Ditto.
        * funit-threads.xml: Ditto.
        * funit.xml: Ditto.
        * funit.java: Replace Config.PKGLIBEXEC*DIR with Config.PKGLIB*DIR.

And so on.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3692

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 18:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3791] Frames without resolved symbol name display address 0x0
In-Reply-To: <20061223154727.3791.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20061223154727.3791.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104180727.19484.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3791

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan  4 18:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3728] Stepping johntheripper destroys stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070104181227.24656.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3728 depends on bug 3791, which changed state.

Bug 3791 Summary: Frames without resolved symbol name display address 0x0
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3791

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3728

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 11:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3822] TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
In-Reply-To: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105114440.27689.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 11:44 -------
I don't think this is during tear down.

Looking at the stack backtrace, there's no reference to tearDown, but there are
references to runUntilStop.  This indicates a failure during the testcase proper.

Could the thread be exiting during a detach, or something else be causing the error?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 16:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105160825.15200.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 3832, which changed state.

Bug 3832 Summary: DOMFunction attribute ending line number not getting set properly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3832

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
Message-ID: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>

./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 100 -console frysk=FINEST
frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon

produces the error:

testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.detach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask.sendDetach(TestRunner)
   at
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached$WaitForUnblock.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Detaching.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$3.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$7.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such
                    process
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3822] TestFStack(StressTestFStack) ptrace: no such process during teardown.
In-Reply-To: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070102164251.3822.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105213432.5996.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:34 -------
Aha, this is a problem with proc.requestAbandon, I've removed the call to
proc.requestAbandon in the TestFstack testcases and added a testStressAbandon
test case to TestAbandon.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3835 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3822

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105213433.5998.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:34 -------
*** Bug 3822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3836] New: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
Message-ID: <20070105213503.3836.npremji@redhat.com>

./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 100 -console frysk=FINEST
frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon

produces the error:

testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.detach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask.sendDetach(TestRunner)
   at
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached$WaitForUnblock.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Detaching.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$3.handleDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$7.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testStressAbandon(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such
                    process
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3836] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213503.3836.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213503.3836.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105213624.7683.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:36 -------
Hmm, dunno why this submitted twice.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3835 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3836

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105213624.7686.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:36 -------
*** Bug 3836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 21:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105214826.11835.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-05 21:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1476)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1476&action=view)
compressed Log output of testStressAbandon


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 22:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3837] New: During intensive stack tracing frysk hangs at odd times.
Message-ID: <20070105225134.3837.npremji@redhat.com>

run the following:

make -j2 && while ./frysk-core/TestRunner -console frysk=FINEST
frysk.util.StressTestFStack.testClone &> stress.log; do echo success; done

will eventually give an error that the testcase took too long.
However the testcase actually completed everything it was meant to do, it just
took a lot longer than it should have.

The hangs seem to be at random times such as the following. Which seems to
indicate there is a hang between the switch/break statement in
StackCallbacks.accessMem.

(Long numbers retrieved using System.currentTimeMillis().)

5-Jan-07 5:19:50 PM frysk.rt.StackCallbacks accessMem
FINEST: After getInt 1168035590661

5-Jan-07 5:19:53 PM frysk.rt.StackCallbacks accessMem
FINE: Libunwind: read value 0x14 1168035593450

5-Jan-07 5:19:53 PM frysk.rt.StackCallbacks accessMem
FINE: Libunwind: reading memory at 0x4aad6d70 1168035593450

-- 
           Summary: During intensive stack tracing frysk hangs at odd times.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3837

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 22:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3837] During intensive stack tracing frysk hangs at odd times.
In-Reply-To: <20070105225134.3837.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105225134.3837.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105225159.6230.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3837

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan  5 23:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 23:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070105233502.12331.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 3834, which changed state.

Bug 3834 Summary: DOM classes could be arranged more efficiently
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3834

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Jan  6 10:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070106104949.12289.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3838


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Jan  6 10:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3838] New: accept testRemoveThenAbandonAttachedDeletedFrom(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) form of a test
Message-ID: <20070106104949.3838.cagney@redhat.com>

Nice work on getting:
  ./TestRunner frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testAbandonAndAbandon
working.  Can it also accept:
  ./TestRunner 'testAbandonAndAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)'
making cut/paste of an individual test from the output:
  Running testAbandonAndAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) ...PASS
  Running testHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...PASS
is easier.  Don't forget examples in the man page.

-- 
           Summary: accept
                    testRemoveThenAbandonAttachedDeletedFrom(frysk.proc.Test
                    Abandon) form of a test
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3838

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Jan  6 10:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070106105620.13521.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3839


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Jan  6 10:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3839] New: funit print meaningfull error messages, not stack backtraces
Message-ID: <20070106105619.3839.cagney@redhat.com>

vis:

./TestRunner frysk.proc.TestAbandon.testAbandonAndAbandonX
Running testAbandonAndAbandonX(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) ...FAIL
  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Method "testAbandonAndAbandonX" not found

Time: 0.006
There was 1 failure:
1)
testAbandonAndAbandonX(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Method "testAbandonAndAbandonX" not found
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

it should print an error message and fail before running any tests.

When it comes to command line programs, error messages at the start, are better
than stack backtraces.

-- 
           Summary: funit print meaningfull error messages, not stack
                    backtraces
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Jan  6 12:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3827] Code uses Build.SRCDIR
In-Reply-To: <20070104134324.3827.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070104134324.3827.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070106125352.17543.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|Code uses Buid.SRCDIR       |Code uses Build.SRCDIR


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3827

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sun Jan  7 04:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070107042716.978.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3841


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sun Jan  7 04:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3841] New:  testParser(frysk.gui.test.TestParser)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: testing source file existence
Message-ID: <20070107042713.3841.cagney@redhat.com>

1) testParser(frysk.gui.test.TestParser)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
testing source file existence
   at frysk.gui.test.TestParser.testParser(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary:
                    testParser(frysk.gui.test.TestParser)junit.framework.Ass
                    ertionFailedError: testing source file existence
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2243,3392
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3841

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sun Jan  7 04:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2243] [tracker] fcore: standalone program for extracing a core file
In-Reply-To: <20060131173948.2243.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173948.2243.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070107042715.961.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3841


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2243

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sun Jan  7 04:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3841] testParser(frysk.gui.test.TestParser)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: testing source file existence
In-Reply-To: <20070107042713.3841.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070107042713.3841.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070107043039.1886.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|                            |testParser(frysk.gui.test.Te
                   |testParser(frysk.gui.test.Te|stParser)junit.framework.Ass
                   |stParser)junit.framework.Ass|ertionFailedError: testing
                   |ertionFailedError: testing  |source file existence
                   |source file existence       |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3841

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 12:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
In-Reply-To: <20061222153241.3784.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061222153241.3784.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108121020.8996.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-08 12:10 -------
Another option would be to set up a simple JUnit based framework.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 15:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108151952.12920.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3844, which changed state.

Bug 3844 Summary: SourceWindow does not update code if current frame steps into new source file
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3844

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 16:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3838] accept testRemoveThenAbandonAttachedDeletedFrom(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) form of a test
In-Reply-To: <20070106104949.3838.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070106104949.3838.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108162139.12681.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3838

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108182040.8957.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2248 depends on bug 3838, which changed state.

Bug 3838 Summary: accept testRemoveThenAbandonAttachedDeletedFrom(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) form of a test
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3838

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 18:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3839] funit print meaningfull error messages, not stack backtraces
In-Reply-To: <20070106105619.3839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070106105619.3839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108184110.18547.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 18:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108184225.18797.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2242 depends on bug 3839, which changed state.

Bug 3839 Summary: funit print meaningfull error messages, not stack backtraces
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3839

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan  8 20:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (ajocksch at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070108203539.14690.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3076 depends on bug 3729, which changed state.

Bug 3729 Summary: Vector is "old school"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3729

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  9 14:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3763] testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: section-1-alignment expected:<0> but was:<4> on x86_64
In-Reply-To: <20061219125759.3763.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20061219125759.3763.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070109140328.3392.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-01-09 14:03 -------
Committed the patch of Comment 2 (to `common/'), after Andrew Cagney's approval.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3763

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  9 16:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3848] New: testClone(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_USR1))
Message-ID: <20070109160229.3848.npremji@redhat.com>

this happens very often since yesterday.

testClone(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_USR1))
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckHandler.assertAwait(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckHandler.await(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$Child.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckDaemonProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckDaemonCloneProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.StressTestFStack.testClone(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testClone(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)junit.framework.As
                    sertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
                    (startChild (Sig_USR1))
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3848

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan  9 21:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3104] EventViewer should show events on the relevant thread as well as process trace
In-Reply-To: <20060822194903.3104.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20060822194903.3104.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070109213152.27269.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3104

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 10 06:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070110064652.31097.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-10 06:46 -------
Nurdin,
How hard would it be to put the stress test in a StressAbandon file?  That way
it's only run when --stress is specified to TestRunner/junit.
Andrew

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 10 09:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3850] New: warning: `missing' script missing
Message-ID: <20070110094647.3850.skasal@redhat.com>

The configure script in frysk-import and other sub-projects says:

/bin/sh: /home/kasal/missing: No such file or directory
configure: WARNING: `missing' script is too old or missing

-- 
           Summary: warning: `missing' script missing
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: skasal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2235
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3850

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 10 09:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070110094649.17869.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3850


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 10 15:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070110151830.8061.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-10 15:18 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nurdin,
> How hard would it be to put the stress test in a StressAbandon file?  That way
> it's only run when --stress is specified to TestRunner/junit.
> Andrew

Done, new file StressTestAbandon contains stressTestAbandon.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 10 21:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3854] New:  testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Couldn't find the given proc
Message-ID: <20070110214441.3854.npremji@redhat.com>

./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 1000 'testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)'

produces this:
 testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
Couldn't find the given proc
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$FindProc.procNotFound(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$3.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$Child.assertFindProcAndTasks(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.multiThreaded(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.testSingleThreadedDetached(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1,  Errors: 0

Failed after run #102

Note that it always fails on run #102.

-- 
           Summary:
                    testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.f
                    ramework.AssertionFailedError: Couldn't find the given
                    proc
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3854

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 11:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111115325.6420.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 11:53 -------
Did you mean "StressAbandon.java" and testAbandon()?  Otherwize the --stress
flag won't make the test run.
 

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3734] Stepping zsh gives ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20061215190716.3734.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061215190716.3734.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111153709.16578.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3734

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2853] Display previous searches as an autocompletion menu
In-Reply-To: <20060627160538.2853.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060627160538.2853.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111153749.17920.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2853

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154054.19918.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 2968, which changed state.

Bug 2968 Summary: Frysk Source Window - variable selection is off by one line in source viewer
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2968

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3716] Binaries compiled with debuginfo from .java should be tested
In-Reply-To: <20061213184903.3716.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061213184903.3716.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154151.20207.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3716

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2223] Find skips over inlined code
In-Reply-To: <20060127160242.2223.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060127160242.2223.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154338.20792.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2223

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3179] Heavy usage of eventviewer causes crash
In-Reply-To: <20060906203102.3179.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20060906203102.3179.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154334.20756.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 15:43 -------
*** Bug 3860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3179

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154336.20774.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 3860, which changed state.

Bug 3860 Summary: EventViewer Crash: The program 'Frysk' received an X Window System error.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3860

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 15:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1910] Display of unavailable variables
In-Reply-To: <20051122191417.1910.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20051122191417.1910.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111154957.22989.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 16:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3835] testStressAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon)ptrace: No such process
In-Reply-To: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070105213250.3835.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111155958.29426.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 15:59 -------
Uh yeah, StressTestAbandon.java and testStressAbandon() is what I had submitted
it as, it runs with TestRunner --stress

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3835

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3861] New: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: libEggTrayIcon: libEggTrayIcon.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Message-ID: <20070111202323.3861.npremji@redhat.com>

running frysk-gui/frysk/bindir/frysk from install tree gives this error.

GTK Accessibility Module initialized
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: libEggTrayIcon:
libEggTrayIcon.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
   at java.lang.Runtime._load(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at org.gnu.gtk.frysk.EggTrayIcon.<clinit>(frysk)
   at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.TrayIcon.<init>(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.common.IconManager.<clinit>(frysk)
   at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.gui.common.IconManager.setImageDir(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(frysk)
   at frysk.main(frysk)

-- 
           Summary: Exception in thread "main"
                    java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: libEggTrayIcon:
                    libEggTrayIcon.so: cannot open shared object file: No
                    such file or directory
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3861

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 21:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3862] New: Upgrade of base FC6 install fails on frysk
Message-ID: <20070111210152.3862.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

After installing FC6 for x86_64 using a network install, yum upgrade fails on
frysk with the following messages:

Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/share/man/man1/ftrace.1.gz from install of
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6 conflicts with file from package
frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6
  file /usr/share/man/man8/funit-child.8.gz from install of
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6 conflicts with file from package
frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6
  file /usr/share/man/man8/funit-exec.8.gz from install of
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6 conflicts with file from package
frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6
  file /usr/share/man/man8/funit-threads.8.gz from install of
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6 conflicts with file from package
frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6
  file /usr/share/man/man8/funit.8.gz from install of
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6 conflicts with file from package
frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6

Removing frysk using 'yum remove frysk', running yup upgrade then, and finally
installing it using 'yum install frysk' works fine.  Note that the install
results in twp RPMs to be installed, of different versions:

frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6  i386
frysk-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6  x86_64

-- 
           Summary: Upgrade of base FC6 install fails on frysk
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3862

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111220233.14256.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2244 depends on bug 3691, which changed state.

Bug 3691 Summary: testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.TestFStack)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3691

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111220235.14278.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3076 depends on bug 3691, which changed state.

Bug 3691 Summary: testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.TestFStack)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3691

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 22:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3216] incorrect logger use in frysk.rt.StackCallbacks.java
In-Reply-To: <20060915205129.3216.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060915205129.3216.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111224345.7350.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-11 22:43 -------
Fixed
January 11, 2007
frysk-core/frysk/rt/CL
	* StackCallbacks.java (accessReg): Use logger formatting mechanism, bug #3216
	(accessFpreg): Ditto.
	(getPid): Ditto.
	(writeFpreg): Ditto.
	(writeMem): Ditto.
	(accessMem): Ditto. Cleaned up some excessive logging junk. 
	(writeReg): Ditto.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3216

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 22:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111224347.7386.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3076 depends on bug 3216, which changed state.

Bug 3216 Summary: incorrect logger use in frysk.rt.StackCallbacks.java
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3216

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 11 22:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070111224346.7374.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 3216, which changed state.

Bug 3216 Summary: incorrect logger use in frysk.rt.StackCallbacks.java
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3216

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 09:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3864] New: Tests timeout is too short
Message-ID: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

Debugging frysk under gdb adds too much overhead and with the all-time-swapping
frysk it will fail on:

(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/jkratoch/redhat/frysk-build/frysk-core/TestRunner -r
1000 testStressMultiThreadedDetach\(frysk.util.StressTestFStack\)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208522512 (LWP 15307)]
[New Thread -1210623088 (LWP 15702)]
Running testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack) ...[New
Thread -1221112944 (LWP 15770)]
PASS

Time: 36.884

OK (1 test)
...
Running testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack) ...FAIL
  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
(perform backtrace)

Time: 9.603
There was 1 failure:
1)
testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (perform backtrace)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.multiThreaded(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.StressTestFStack.testStressMultiThreadedDetach(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1,  Errors: 0


It looks as frysk testsuite goes the same way as gdb testsuite where many
testcases have instable results depending on various races.  Any timeout should
be >=300 seconds and it should be exhausted only in the FAIL case.

-- 
           Summary: Tests timeout is too short
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3864

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 09:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3864] Tests timeout is too short
In-Reply-To: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070112091407.20954.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-01-12 09:14 -------
Created an attachment (id=1490)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1490&action=view)
Temporary timeout increase to at least 60 seconds.

Test started to behave the same way in gdb as without it.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3864

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 11:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3728] Stepping johntheripper destroys stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070112111811.23503.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3728 depends on bug 3791, which changed state.

Bug 3791 Summary: Frames without resolved symbol name display address 0x0
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3791

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3728

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 11:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3863] libunwind occasionally does not return frame function names.
In-Reply-To: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070112112639.27179.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-01-12 11:26 -------
Disowning this Bug as it is not libunwind related.

libunwind only fails to resolve the symbols after the fd (file descriptor)
process table gets filled up (>1024 fds).

You can debug it by:
valgrind --track-fds=yes ./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 1000
'testStressMultiThreadedDetach(frysk.util.StressTestFStack)'

resulting in libunwind's failings:
Warning: invalid file descriptor 1019 in syscall open()

and the final reported leaked fds:
Open file descriptor 178: /lib/libc-2.5.so
   at 0x40515C2: open64 (open64.c:45)
   by 0x85A5E5A: dwfl_linux_proc_find_elf (linux-proc-maps.c:297)
   by 0x85A407D: find_file (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:103)
   by 0x85A4B71: find_dw (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:395)
   by 0x85A4CC6: dwfl_module_getdwarf (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:462)
   by 0x85AADB2: dwfl_module_getsrc (dwfl_module_getsrc.c:57)
   by 0x85A6CA3: dwfl_getsrc (dwfl_getsrc.c:55)
   by 0x8161192: _ZN3lib2dw4Dwfl11dwfl_getsrcEJxx (Dwfl.cxx:138)
   by 0x81583B6: _ZN3lib2dw4Dwfl13getSourceLineEJPNS0_8DwflLineEx (Dwfl.java:110)
   by 0x8133C36: frysk::rt::StackFrame::StackFrame(lib::unwind::FrameCursor*,
frysk::proc::Task*, frysk::rt::StackFrame*) (StackFrame.java:127)
   by 0x8133952:
_ZN5frysk2rt12StackFactory16createStackFrameEJPNS0_10StackFrameEPNS_4proc4TaskEi
(StackFactory.java:79)
   by 0x8133AB4:
_ZN5frysk2rt12StackFactory16createStackFrameEJPNS0_10StackFrameEPNS_4proc4TaskE
(StackFactory.java:112)

Open file descriptor 177: /usr/lib/debug/lib/ld-2.5.so.debug
   at 0x40515C2: open64 (open64.c:45)
   by 0x85A501E: try_open (find-debuginfo.c:79)
   by 0x85A53D4: dwfl_standard_find_debuginfo (find-debuginfo.c:178)
   by 0x85A45AF: find_debuginfo (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:178)
   by 0x85A4BEA: find_dw (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:417)
   by 0x85A4CC6: dwfl_module_getdwarf (dwfl_module_getdwarf.c:462)
   by 0x85AADB2: dwfl_module_getsrc (dwfl_module_getsrc.c:57)
   by 0x85A6CA3: dwfl_getsrc (dwfl_getsrc.c:55)
   by 0x8161192: _ZN3lib2dw4Dwfl11dwfl_getsrcEJxx (Dwfl.cxx:138)
   by 0x81583B6: _ZN3lib2dw4Dwfl13getSourceLineEJPNS0_8DwflLineEx (Dwfl.java:110)
   by 0x8133C08: frysk::rt::StackFrame::StackFrame(lib::unwind::FrameCursor*,
frysk::proc::Task*, frysk::rt::StackFrame*) (StackFrame.java:125)
   by 0x8133B12: frysk::rt::StackFrame::StackFrame(lib::unwind::FrameCursor*,
frysk::proc::Task*) (StackFrame.java:92)


There is some leakage, libdwfl's dwfl_end() is not called appropriately.
As it is called from the Dwfl binding's finalize() I assume there are some
leaked Java object references.
But I did not analyse it more as the bug looks to lie in the Java land.
Also running of the testcase above eats about 0.5GB of memory also suggesting
some leakage occurs there.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|jan dot kratochvil at redhat|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |dot com                     |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3863

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 17:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3865] New: Testsuite frysk3525/ext47 test fails
Message-ID: <20070112170941.3865.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

Here is the output:

12737 installing signal handler and mask
12737 forking
12739 signaling 12737 with User defined signal 1
12739 waiting for signals
12737 calling waitpid 12738 for << child exit creating daemon >> returns 0x0
WIFEXITED 0 -- ok
12737 waiting for signals
12737 received User defined signal 1
12737 calling ptrace 16 (ATTACH) 12739 0
12737 calling waitpid 12739 for << daemon attached >> returns 0x137f WIFSTOPPED
19 -- ok
12737 calling ptrace 7 (CONT) 12739 0
12737 signaling 12739 with User defined signal 1
12737 calling waitpid 12739 for << daemon receives SIGUSR1 >> returns 0xa7f
WIFSTOPPED 10 -- ok
12737 calling ptrace 7 (CONT) 12739 10
12737 calling waitpid 12739 for << daemon does exit(47) >>12739 received User
defined signal 1
 returns 0x2f WIFSIGNALED 47 -- WIFEXITED 47 expected
Aborted

-- 
           Summary: Testsuite frysk3525/ext47 test fails
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3865

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 17:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3865] Testsuite frysk3525/ext47 test fails
In-Reply-To: <20070112170941.3865.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070112170941.3865.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070112172026.30747.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-01-12 17:20 -------
Note that this problem occurs on FC6 x86_64, Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.dc6.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3865

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 12 20:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070112200027.30415.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3473, which changed state.

Bug 3473 Summary: TestLib.Child.sendStopXXX aka assertSendStop doesn't
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3473

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 18:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2104] [tracker] Fedora Core 5
In-Reply-To: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115180154.24347.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2104 depends on bug 3240, which changed state.

Bug 3240 Summary: TestBreakpoints failiure on x86 FC5
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3240

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2104

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 18:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2127] [tracker] x86-64 a.k.a. amd64, em64t, Intel (R) 64, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060109170232.2127.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060109170232.2127.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115184318.21224.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2127 depends on bug 3241, which changed state.

Bug 3241 Summary: TestSyscallSignal failures on x86 FC5
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3241

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2127

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 18:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3863] libunwind occasionally does not return frame function names.
In-Reply-To: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115184313.21202.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-15 18:43 -------
*** Bug 3241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3863

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 19:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3873] New: TestLib.isChildOf() to use Stat.ppid rather than proc.getParent().getPid()
Message-ID: <20070115195220.3873.npremji@redhat.com>

Trying to switch over isChildOf to use Stat.ppid rather than using
proc.getParent().getPid() so that getProc interface can be used (an even more
optimized interface than findProc).

The problem is some testcases have problems with this new implementation as
sometimes the ppid returned from Stat is 0. I think this means that the process
is a zombie but I'm not sure. The Stat.state character returns ^@ instead of 'Z'.

Code:
    static public boolean isChildOf (int pid, Proc proc)
    {
      logger.log(Level.FINE, "isChildOf pid: {0} proc: {1}\n", 
                 new Object[] {new Integer(pid), proc});
	// Process 1 has no parent so can't be a child of mine.
	if (proc.getPid () == 1)
      {
        logger.log(Level.FINE, "isChildOf proc is init\n");
	    return false;
      }
	// If the parent's pid matches this processes pid, assume that
	// is sufficient.  Would need a very very long running system
	// for that to not be the case.        
    
    Stat stat = new Stat();
    stat.refresh(proc.id.id);
    
	if (stat.ppid == pid)
      {
        logger.log(Level.FINE, "isChildOf proc is child\n");
	    return true;
      }
    logger.log(Level.FINE, "isChildOf proc {3} not child pid: {0} ppid: {1}
parent: {2}\n",
               new Object[] {new Integer(pid), new Integer(stat.ppid),
proc.getParent(), proc});
    
    logger.log(Level.FINE, "isChildOf status{0}\n", new Character(stat.state));
	return false;
    }

Log to follow.

-- 
           Summary: TestLib.isChildOf() to use Stat.ppid rather than
                    proc.getParent().getPid()
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3539
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3873

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 19:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3539] Evaluate proc.getParent lazy style
In-Reply-To: <20061117212955.3539.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061117212955.3539.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115195222.5338.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3873


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3539

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 19:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3873] TestLib.isChildOf() to use Stat.ppid rather than proc.getParent().getPid()
In-Reply-To: <20070115195220.3873.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070115195220.3873.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115195351.6129.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-15 19:53 -------
Created an attachment (id=1497)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1497&action=view)
Log file of testProcBlockExec(frysk.proc.TestExec)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3873

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 20:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3780] frysk.*.Build contains multi-lib conflicts
In-Reply-To: <20061221210406.3780.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061221210406.3780.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115200814.19913.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-15 20:08 -------
Index: frysk-gui/common/ChangeLog
2007-01-15  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * Build.javain (ABS_SRCDIR): Delete.

Index: frysk-gui/frysk/gui/ChangeLog
2007-01-15  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * test/TestIconManager.java (BASE_PATH, imagePaths): Delete,
        eliminate reference to Build .ABS_SRCDIR.
        (testIconManagerLoad): Update, use frysk .junit .Paths
        .getImagePrefix.
        * test/TestWindowFactorization.java (gladePaths, BASE_PATH)
        (imagePaths): Delete, eliminate Build .ABS_SRCDIR.
        (initGlades): Simplify., use frysk .junit .Paths .getGladePrefix.
        (setUp): Use frysk .junit .Paths .getImagePrefix.
        (testWindowFactorization): Add throw list.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3780

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 20:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3873] TestLib.isChildOf() to use Stat.ppid rather than proc.getParent().getPid()
In-Reply-To: <20070115195220.3873.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070115195220.3873.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115204535.5396.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3873

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 15 21:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3413] multilib conflict: jars are platform dependent
In-Reply-To: <20061023115918.3413.skasal@redhat.com>
References: <20061023115918.3413.skasal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070115210926.23963.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3413 depends on bug 3780, which changed state.

Bug 3780 Summary: frysk.*.Build contains multi-lib conflicts
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3780

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3413

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 16 20:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3875] New: TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between funit-child processes and non-funit processes
Message-ID: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>

Currently the funit-child process is assumed for some AckProcess derivatives but
not all. Sometimes it is unclear which processes are funit-child and which are not. 

Needs to have the funit-child processes on the bottom level as extensions to
more generic AckProcesses. Ex. FunitChildAttached extends AttachedAckProcess.

-- 
           Summary: TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between
                    funit-child processes and non-funit processes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3875

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 16 23:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3875] TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between funit-child processes and non-funit processes
In-Reply-To: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070116235949.27679.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-16 23:59 -------
Good point.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3875

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 17 13:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3878] New: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleStoppedEvent 
Message-ID: <20070117135847.3878.mcvet@redhat.com>

Came across this one when directly instantiating the Source Window from the 
command line rather than from the session manager. Occurs when the window is 
attempting to block the process by adding an instruction observer.

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925,state=detached} in 
state "detached" did not handle handleStoppedEvent

frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.TaskState.handleStoppedEvent(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Task.processStoppedEvent(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(FryskGui)
frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.Gui$5.run(FryskGui)
java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925
                    ,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle
                    handleStoppedEvent
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3878

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 17 14:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3878] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleStoppedEvent
In-Reply-To: <20070117135847.3878.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070117135847.3878.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070117141035.25263.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-17 14:10 -------
Mine

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@|{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@
                   |3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925|3b7cc42d,pid=21926,tid=21925
                   |,state=detached} in state   |,state=detached} in state
                   |"detached" did not handle   |"detached" did not handle
                   |handleStoppedEvent          |handleStoppedEvent


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3878

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 17 20:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070117203829.28115.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3881


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 17 20:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3881] New: manpages are platform-specific
Message-ID: <20070117203828.3881.skasal@redhat.com>

man8/funit*.8, man8/ftail.8, and man8/fsystest.8 contain full path to the
utilities, which contains platform-specific ${libdir}.

But the manpages are installed under /usr/share, so they are supposed to be
platform-independent.

-- 
           Summary: manpages are platform-specific
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: skasal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2235
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3881

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 11:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070119114034.18099.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-19 11:40 -------
With 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 kernel gives:
kernel: BUGging on (tsk->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
and then seems to hang the machine.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 11:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070119115734.25789.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-19 11:57 -------
A second make check run (after reboot) with 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 gave the following:

Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: BUGging on (tsk->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:193!
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: SMP
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: last sysfs file:
/class/net/eth1/statistics/collisions
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: Modules linked in: i915 drm autofs4
cpufreq_ondemand video sbs ibm_acpi i2c_ec dock button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6
parport_pc lp parport joydev snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_seq_dummy sg
snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss
snd_pcm snd_timer serio_raw ata_piix snd soundcore nsc_ircc e1000 snd_page_alloc
irda crc_ccitt i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt i2c_core ide_cd cdrom pcspkr dm_snapshot
dm_zero dm_mirror dm_mod ahci libata sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd
uhci_hcd
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: CPU:    0
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: EIP:    0060:[<c0456467>]    Not tainted VLI
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: EFLAGS: 00210296   (2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 #1)
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: EIP is at check_dead_utrace+0x55/0x110
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: eax: 0000002f   ebx: de725670   ecx: c0697ed0
edx: 00200082
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: esi: 00000000   edi: d02e53a0   ebp: d02e53a0
esp: dd8dfdf8
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: Process threadexec (pid: 20057, ti=dd8df000
task=de725670 task.ti=dd8df000)
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: Stack: c063e591 c064c238 d02e53a8 00000000
d02e53a8 d02e53a0 c045657c 00000000
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:        de725670 d02e53a8 00000020 de725670
d02e53a0 c04578ee 00000000 00000000
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:        dabc7778 00200246 de725b18 dabc7740
e4c313a0 d02e53b0 00000010 d02e53a0
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: Call Trace:
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c045657c>] remove_detached+0x5a/0x6d
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c04578ee>] utrace_report_death+0x221/0x229
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c042a65a>] do_exit+0x6e1/0x787
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c042a78d>] sys_exit_group+0x0/0xd
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c0433185>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x38b/0x3b3
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c040365b>] do_notify_resume+0x83/0x6c6
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  [<c04040da>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x19
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  =======================
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: Code: f0 f7 d0 83 e2 08 85 d0 0f 84 80 00 00 00
85 c9 74 7c 83 f9 10 74 1c c7 44 24 04 38 c2 64 c0 c7 04 24 91 e5 63 c0 e8 6a 16
fd ff <0f> 0b c1 00 0a c2 64 c0 83 bb 98 00 00 00 ff 75 33 b8 20 00 00
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel: EIP: [<c0456467>] check_dead_utrace+0x55/0x110
SS:ESP 0068:dd8dfdf8
Jan 19 12:53:45 hermans kernel:  <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3864] Tests timeout is too short
In-Reply-To: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070112091240.3864.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119223950.3334.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-19 22:39 -------
A 300 second timeout would mean waiting 5 minutes for each test to fail, outch!

Since each frysk test (ignoring the stress tests which are not run by default)
should complete in a second or so, a 5 second timeout is sufficient as a default.

For the cases where something such as gdb, or the logger, is slowing things
down, a [recently added] -timeout N option is available.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |2234
              nThis|                            |
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3864

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119225309.7566.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3890


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3890] New: attach doesn't need a program argument
Message-ID: <20070119225308.3890.cagney@redhat.com>

for instance, instead of:

  (fhpd) attach my-program 1234

just:

  (fhpd) attach 1234

is suffcient as the program can be obtained from the running executable.

The HPD command set, has querks that I think can be traced back to trying to
support remote systems - "pid" might be remote, program local.

-- 
           Summary: attach doesn't need a program argument
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3890

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119225548.8641.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3891


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3891] New: attach command not asynchronous, no success output
Message-ID: <20070119225548.3891.cagney@redhat.com>

The "attach" command, which internally would be implemented as adding terminate
observers, should be asynchronous.

vis, something like:

(hpd) attach PID
(hpd)
Process PID attached, observing terminate events.
(hpd)

-- 
           Summary: attach command not asynchronous, no success output
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3891

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119225752.10146.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3892


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 22:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3892] New: accept: $ fhpd PID; attach to PID
Message-ID: <20070119225752.3892.cagney@redhat.com>

For ease of use, and consistency with the other command line utilities, the fhpd
command should accept a simple PID on the command line, and assume the intent is
to attach to it.

-- 
           Summary: accept: $ fhpd PID; attach to PID
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3892

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119230243.12481.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3893


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3893] New: accept standard debug command-line internal tracing options
Message-ID: <20070119230243.3893.cagney@redhat.com>

All the command line utilites accept a standard collection of options, for instance:
  --help
  --log LOG
there's a generic method for setting most of these up.

-- 
           Summary: accept standard debug command-line internal tracing
                    options
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3893

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3894] New: assign<tab> doesn't append a space
Message-ID: <20070119230546.3894.cagney@redhat.com>

Once a base command as tab completed it should automatically have a blank
appended ready for entry of the first parameter, for instance ([] denotes the
cursor):

  (fhpd) ass[]<tab>
gives
  (fhpd) assign[]
but should give:
  (fhpd) assign []

-- 
           Summary: assign<tab> doesn't append a space
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3894

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119230546.13777.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3894


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119230905.22858.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3895


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3895] New: help doesn't mention where, up, down et.al.
Message-ID: <20070119230905.3895.cagney@redhat.com>

The commands:
   where
   up
   down
don't appear in the help output.

This shouldn't be possible since, hopefully, all commands when added to the
command line parser are required to provide help information.

-- 
           Summary: help doesn't mention where, up, down et.al.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3895

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119231026.23356.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3896


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3896] New: cntrl-d hangs fhpd cli
Message-ID: <20070119231026.3896.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance, where [] is cursor:

   (fhpd) []<cntrl-d>

does a hang.

-- 
           Summary: cntrl-d hangs fhpd cli
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3896

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3897] New: print object file / shared library when no source file
Message-ID: <20070119231609.3897.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance, instead of:

#0 0x556402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xcd740d in __poll ()

print something like:

#0 0x556402 in __kernel_vsyscall () from [vdso]
#1 0xcd740d in __poll () from libc.so

(the actual names will likely be longer / different to this) this becomes more
important when there's no symbol vis:

#0 0x123456

vs

#0 0x123457 from libc.so

-- 
           Summary: print object file / shared library when no source file
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2244
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3897

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119231610.24498.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3897


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119232309.27527.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3898


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070119232311.27549.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3898


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 19 23:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3898] New: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
Message-ID: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>

fstack and fhpd format their stack backtraces differently.

ex#1:
  fstack: #0 0x556402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
  fhpd: # 0 0xcd3402 in __kernel_vsyscall at #0
fstack is better, << at #0 >>, which is a non-existant line, shouldn't be included.

ex#2:
  fstack: #5 0x81133e9 in _start () from: ../../stack.c#225
  fhpd: # 5 0x81133e9 in _start at ../../stack.c#225
(ignoring that I strongly doubt that "_start" is in stack.c), their output
should be consistent.

Likely there should be a generic method, that when passed a stack backtrace
formats it to a writer.

-- 
           Summary: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2244,2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 15:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3865] Testsuite frysk3525/ext47 test fails
In-Reply-To: <20070112170941.3865.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070112170941.3865.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070122150515.7800.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-22 15:05 -------
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216020

Note that this kernel bug causes corresponding testsuite failures.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3525 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3865

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 18:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122182815.30083.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 3903, which changed state.

Bug 3903 Summary: StackFrame should provide a way to get non-interrupt frame pre-call PC
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3903

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3904] New: RunState is using java.util.Vector
Message-ID: <20070122205227.3904.mcvet@redhat.com>

And should be using another list type instead. Build system should catch this?

-- 
           Summary: RunState is using java.util.Vector
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3904

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 21:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3904] RunState is using java.util.Vector
In-Reply-To: <20070122205227.3904.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070122205227.3904.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122212603.25707.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-22 21:26 -------
	* RunState.java (setUpStep): Removed redundant try statement.
	(LineBreakpoint): Changed Vector members to LinkedList, via #3904.
	(LineBreakpoint.addBreakpoint): Some changes addressing above.
	(LineBreakpoint.deleteBreakpoint): Ditto.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3904

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 22:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3881] manpages are platform-specific
In-Reply-To: <20070117203828.3881.skasal@redhat.com>
References: <20070117203828.3881.skasal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122223039.28521.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |3385
              nThis|                            |
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3881

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 22:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3385] [tracker] RHEL 5
In-Reply-To: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122223116.28866.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3385 depends on bug 3881, which changed state.

Bug 3881 Summary: manpages are platform-specific
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3881

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3385

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 22:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122223116.28869.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3881, which changed state.

Bug 3881 Summary: manpages are platform-specific
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3881

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 22:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3904] RunState is using java.util.Vector
In-Reply-To: <20070122205227.3904.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070122205227.3904.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122225537.10235.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |2235
              nThis|                            |
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3904

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 22 22:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070122225625.11596.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3904, which changed state.

Bug 3904 Summary: RunState is using java.util.Vector
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3904

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
In-Reply-To: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123152739.30471.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-23 15:27 -------
Created an attachment (id=1517)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1517&action=view)
Proposed patch for CLI to use same string that fstack uses.

I don't know what to run to check the fhpd for backtrace format but I'm fairly
sure this will work.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 16:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
In-Reply-To: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123162918.7082.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From scox at redhat dot com  2007-01-23 16:29 -------
The fhpd 'where' request has been there quite a while, mostly out of necessity.
 I tried to style it after the hpd doc.  Feel free to change it for the better
as far as I am concerned.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 17:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123172148.12786.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3907


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 17:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3907] New: FryskHelpManager uses Runtime.exec
Message-ID: <20070123172147.3907.cagney@redhat.com>

The problem with Runtime.exec is that it uses "SIGCHLD" and waitpid to clean up
after the created subprocess.  Since frysk is also managing those kernel
interfaces a chash occures.

Instead the code should more directly use frysk.sys.Fork.exec or similar to
create the child process.

-- 
           Summary: FryskHelpManager uses Runtime.exec
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3398
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3907

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 17:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123172713.18664.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3908


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 17:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3908] New: help doesn't work from build tree
Message-ID: <20070123172713.3908.cagney@redhat.com>

Clicking on the HELP button from the build tree doesn't work.

The problem here is that Config.getHelpDir() returns the install-tree help path.
 The FryskGui binary needs to instead provide the build tree help path.

At present FryskGui / frysk do this by passing the applicable path to Gui.java,
which then notifies relevant code of the correct path.

-- 
           Summary: help doesn't work from build tree
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3398
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3908

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 17:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3907] FryskHelpManager uses Runtime.exec
In-Reply-To: <20070123172147.3907.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070123172147.3907.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123172923.21919.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-23 17:29 -------
The method frysk.sys.Fork.daemon() would be best as it re-parents the process to
not be frysk.

Of course, this also has the disadvantage of not being able to determine when
the program fails to start.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3907

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 18:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2825] Frysk observer display with white background makes color changes necessary
In-Reply-To: <20060623134406.2825.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060623134406.2825.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123180630.8002.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2825

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 21:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3898] fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
In-Reply-To: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119232308.3898.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123215635.22629.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 22:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123222040.8111.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2244 depends on bug 3898, which changed state.

Bug 3898 Summary: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 22:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070123222034.8078.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 3898, which changed state.

Bug 3898 Summary: fstack and fhpd disagree on backtrace format
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 23 22:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3910] New: Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
Message-ID: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

Basically

...
...
// Get a Proc
    AckProcess ackProc = new DetachedAckProcess();
    ackProc.assertSendStop();

...
...

In a class that extends ProcBlockAction, the constructor is called, but the the
overriden existingTask() method never gets called. It seems hang somewere. 

Like

Class Foo extends ProcBlockAction

public Foo(Proc proc)
{
   super(proc)
   ..
   // do constructor stuff
   ..
}

public void existingTask (Task task)
{
...
// This never gets called. No tasks are collected?
}

Apologies at the lack of initial data, just wanted to get the bug filed, and add
data later

-- 
           Summary: Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever)
                    with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 11:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3912] New: linux.syscall.h is a kludge
Message-ID: <20070124112727.3912.mark@klomp.org>

We want to use the _syscall macros to get some type safety. To get that we
define them ourselves in frysk-imports/include/linux.syscall.h which doesn't
always seem to work. One problem is the MAX_ERRNO definition. See also upstream bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224130

-- 
           Summary: linux.syscall.h is a kludge
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3912

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 15:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] New: Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
Message-ID: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>

Stepping and running through a process with the SourceWindow, and then trying 
to bring up the RegisterWindow results in a core exception:


frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.refreshList(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.load(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.finishRegWin(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow$LockObserver.update(FryskGui)
java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(libgcj.so.7rh)
frysk.rt.RunState.updateExecuted(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Proc$14.add(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Attached.handleAddObservation(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Task.handleAddObservation(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.TaskObservation.handleAdd(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching.allAttached(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching$ToMainTask.handleTaskAttachCompleted(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Proc$4.execute(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: Core exception at:
                    frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 15:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3914] New: RegisterWindow: ptrace: Input/output error
Message-ID: <20070124154310.3914.mcvet@redhat.com>

Attempting to bring up the RegisterWindow through the SourceWindow on seemingly 
any process results in:

ptrace: Input/output error
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.peek(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.PtraceByteBuffer.peek(FryskGui)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.peekFully(FryskGui)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.get(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Register.getBigInteger(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.setTask(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.finishRegWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindowFactory.createRegisterWindow(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.toggleRegisterWindow(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$19.actionEvent(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Action.fireActionEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Action.handleActivate(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: RegisterWindow: ptrace: Input/output error
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3914

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 15:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] New: Memory leakage
Message-ID: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>

Opening on a sizeable program with debuginfo and source, and then attempting to 
step and run through it steadily increases the memory footprint of FryskGui.

Starting at around 100M on x86_64 when the SourceWindow first opens, and 
increasing around .5M per step.

-- 
           Summary: Memory leakage
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 15:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] Memory leakage
In-Reply-To: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124155326.21255.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 15:53 -------
Created an attachment (id=1519)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1519&action=view)
Screenshot of Gnome system monitor


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 16:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3914] RegisterWindow: ptrace: Input/output error
In-Reply-To: <20070124154310.3914.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154310.3914.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124163040.14312.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 16:30 -------
Should note this is x86_64

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3914

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 16:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
In-Reply-To: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124163058.14380.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 16:30 -------
x86_64

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 17:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
In-Reply-To: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124175928.26417.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 17:59 -------
Thanks to Mark's recent patch, we now know which Exception it was:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.refreshList(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.load(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.finishRegWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow$LockObserver.update(FryskGui)
   at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.rt.RunState.updateExecuted(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifyInstruction(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleTrappedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processTrappedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 18:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3917] New: libunwind: Nested functions resolving broken
Message-ID: <20070124181836.3917.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: libunwind: Nested functions resolving broken
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3917

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3917] libunwind: Nested functions resolving broken
In-Reply-To: <20070124181836.3917.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070124181836.3917.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124182034.7490.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 18:20 -------
[mistaken commit]
Bug 3791 frysk-unwinder-update.patch
  http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1491&action=view
sometimes could fail on:
fstack: ../../frysk/frysk-imports/lib/unwind/cni/FrameCursor.cxx:86: void
lib::unwind::FrameCursor::create_frame_cursor(jlong): Assertion `ip == offset +
proc_info.start_ip' failed.

That is correct as part of libunwind apparently supports nested functions but
the other part not:
ip=0xb2ee46,offset=0xc,proc_info.start_ip=0xb2ee30,buf="__pause_nocancel"
   969: 00b2ee30   101 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   11 pause@@GLIBC_2.0
  4235: 00b2ee3a    20 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT   11 __pause_nocancel
Currect:    offset=0xc,proc_info.start_ip=0xb2ee3a,buf="__pause_nocancel"


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3917

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 18:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
In-Reply-To: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124182324.8049.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-24 18:23 -------
Seems to be reproduceable: If #3913 can be reproduced, than an extra step leads 
to this error.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 19:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
In-Reply-To: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124193221.20258.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-24 19:32 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks to Mark's recent patch, we now know which Exception it was:
> 
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>    at frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
>    at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
>    at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.stringUsingView(FryskGui)
>    at frysk.gui.register.RegisterWindow.refreshList(FryskGui)

That seems to indicate that value is null. Maybe the following debug info helps
find the real problem, or at least verifies that value is indeed null.

diff -u -r1.34 RegisterWindow.java
--- frysk-gui/frysk/gui/register/RegisterWindow.java    23 Jan 2007 16:47:34
-0000      1.34
+++ frysk-gui/frysk/gui/register/RegisterWindow.java    24 Jan 2007 19:30:31 -0000
@@ -484,6 +484,10 @@
        int bitlength = register.getLength() * 8;
        BigInteger value
          = (BigInteger)model.getValue(iter, (DataColumnObject)cols[11]);
+
+       if (value == null)
+         System.err.println("Whoa! value null with: " + register);
+
        RegisterView view = register.getViews()[0];
 
        // Binary little endian


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 19:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3913] Core exception at: frysk.proc.BitfieldAccessor.getIntField(FryskGui)
In-Reply-To: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154101.3913.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124193328.21223.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-24 19:33 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Seems to be reproduceable: If #3913 can be reproduced, than an extra step leads 
> to this error.

That seems a little recursive. If this bug occurs then it is reproduced?
Could you give some more steps?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3913

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 19:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3912] linux.syscall.h is a kludge
In-Reply-To: <20070124112727.3912.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070124112727.3912.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070124194744.29611.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-01-24 19:47 -------
Upstream said:

    You must not include anything from asm/ or linux/ into a user mode program.

    You can use the definition as a basis to write your own.

This is a bit of a pity since that means we would have to define (copy/paste)
these macros for all the different architectures we support.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3912

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 24 20:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3728] Stepping johntheripper destroys stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061214200123.3728.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070124203622.25820.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3728 depends on bug 3791, which changed state.

Bug 3791 Summary: Frames without resolved symbol name display address 0x0
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3791

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3728

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 19:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3917] libunwind: Nested functions resolving broken
In-Reply-To: <20070124181836.3917.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070124181836.3917.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125190042.15991.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-01-25 19:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=1521)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1521&action=view)
Reproducibility inferior.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3917

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 21:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3923] New: Monitor "Main Log" has some inconsistent printing
Message-ID: <20070125212558.3923.mcvet@redhat.com>

Just as I was watching a syscall observer dump numerous lines to console, it 
printed:

Thu Jan 25 16:24:40 EST 2007 Syscall Observer: PID: 17555 TID: 17555 Event: 
Entering Syscall - write (10,0x68fd80,3) Host: Unknown Host
Thu Jan 25 16:24:40 EST 2007 Syscall Observer PID: 17555 TID: 17555 Event: 
Leaving Syscall -  write r= 3 Host: Unknown Host
Thu Jan 25 16:24:40 EST 2007 Syscall Observer: PID: 17555 TID: 17555 Event: 
Entering Syscall - read (10,0x7fff0b276a5f,1) Host: Unknown Host
5 Event: Entering Syscall - rt_sigsuspend Host: Unknown Host

Some lines have "Observer: PID:" while others have "Observer PID:"
And the last line seems to be misplaced

-- 
           Summary: Monitor "Main Log" has some inconsistent printing
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3923

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 21:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3923] Monitor "Main Log" has some inconsistent printing
In-Reply-To: <20070125212558.3923.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070125212558.3923.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125214849.24938.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-01-25 21:48 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3288 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3923

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 21:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3854] testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Couldn't find the given proc
In-Reply-To: <20070110214441.3854.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070110214441.3854.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125215948.28546.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|                            |testSingleThreadedDetached(f
                   |testSingleThreadedDetached(f|rysk.util.TestFStack)junit.f
                   |rysk.util.TestFStack)junit.f|ramework.AssertionFailedErro
                   |ramework.AssertionFailedErro|r: Couldn't find the given
                   |r: Couldn't find the given  |proc
                   |proc                        |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3854

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3925] New: Multiple runs of testSingleThreadedDetached cause too many open files.
Message-ID: <20070125220811.3925.npremji@redhat.com>

./frysk-core/TestRunner -r 1000 'testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)'

produces the following: 

Running testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack) ...execvp: Too many
open files
25-Jan-07 4:59:09 PM frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5 terminated
WARNING: No task for pid 15,123

FAIL
  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
(startChild (Sig_USR1))

Time: 5.008
There was 1 failure:
1)
testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_USR1))
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckHandler.assertAwait(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckHandler.await(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$Child.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$AckProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib$DetachedAckProcess.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFStack.testSingleThreadedDetached(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1,  Errors: 0

Failed after run #203

Note that it always fails after run #203.

-- 
           Summary: Multiple runs of testSingleThreadedDetached cause too
                    many open files.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3925

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3539] Evaluate proc.getParent lazy style
In-Reply-To: <20061117212955.3539.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061117212955.3539.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125221122.8365.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3539

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3875] TestLib AckProcesses should be broken down between funit-child processes and non-funit processes
In-Reply-To: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070116195954.3875.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125221200.9066.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3875

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3925] Multiple runs of testSingleThreadedDetached cause too many open files.
In-Reply-To: <20070125220811.3925.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070125220811.3925.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125221243.9415.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3925

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125222102.11382.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 2985, which changed state.

Bug 2985 Summary: Frysk Monitor, process termination adds observers to EventViewer
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2985

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3910] Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
In-Reply-To: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125222142.11644.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-25 22:21 -------
Adding logs and run scenario:

TestRunner --timeout 5 -log frysk=FINE frysk.util.TestFCore.testCoreFileCreated

Running testCoreFileCreated(frysk.util.TestFCore) ...23254.23254:
argv[0]=/home/pmuldoon/frysk_bin/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-child
23254.23254: argv[1]=--wait=suspend
23254.23254: argv[2]=10
23254.23254: argv[3]=23252
23254.23254: starting 23254
23254.23254: new thread 23254.23254
23254.23254: notify 23252 with 10 (User defined signal 1) -- new thread 23254.23254

FAIL
  junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
(Running event loop for core file)

Time: 25.015

There was 1 failure:
1)
testCoreFileCreated(frysk.util.TestFCore)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (Running event loop for core file)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFCore.constructCore(TestRunner)
   at frysk.util.TestFCore.testCoreFileCreated(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1,  Errors: 0

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3910] Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
In-Reply-To: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125222505.12450.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-25 22:25 -------
Created an attachment (id=1522)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1522&action=view)
Core event log


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3926] New: More detailed stack frame testing.
Message-ID: <20070125224025.3926.npremji@redhat.com>

We need to test more cases of different stack frame scenarios.

Currently we have a simple c function compiled with debug info, stripped of
debug info, and stripped of all symbols.

Other cases that have been mentioned are:

signal framess.
finished but unjoined threads.
Some combinations of:
 * unprelinked (0x0 basde) / prelinked (only the base binary)
 * before .debug separation / after .debug separation
All the combinations of:
 * -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables vs. -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
 * without/with -fpie -pie (or use -fpic?)
 * -O0 / -O2
 * -shared / -shared -g / -g
Address cases:
 * Nested (==overlapping) functions (head, nested part, tail)
   (=>outer, inner, outer)
 * Address where the last symbol before is zero-sized and in different section
   (=>unresolved)
 * Address where the last symbol before is non-zero-sized and smaller than the
   distance (=>unresolved)
 * Global function, local function, global function - all three addresses
Unwinding - backtraces:
 * Signal handler unwinds to the first / last function instruction
 * Signal handler unwinds to zero address / zero descriptor
 * Corrupted stack - recovery, corrupted by odd entries number

-- 
           Summary: More detailed stack frame testing.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3926

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Jan 25 22:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3926] More detailed stack frame testing.
In-Reply-To: <20070125224025.3926.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070125224025.3926.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070125224132.21934.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3926

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 14:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3927] New: FryskHelpManager initial startup causes backtrace
Message-ID: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>

After converting FryskHelpManager.java to use frysk.sys.Fork.daemon instead of
r.exec, the initial activation(and only the initial activation) causes a
backtrace, but still comes up properly.  FryskHelpManager activates
/usr/bin/gnome-help when the "Help" button is clicked on the first Frysk UI
screen.  When that button is clicked the first time the following backtrace occurs:

waitpid: No child processes (process 21424)
   at frysk.sys.Fork.daemon(Fork.cxx:159)
   at frysk.sys.Fork.daemon(Fork.java:97)
   at frysk.gui.common.FryskHelpManager.activateHelp(FryskHelpManager.java:63)
   at frysk.gui.SessionManagerGui.helpSession(SessionManagerGui.java:494)
   at frysk.gui.SessionManagerGui$12.buttonEvent(SessionManagerGui.java:384)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.fireButtonEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.handleClick(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(Gui.java:284)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui.java:88)

Even thought this backtrace occurs, the proper gnome-help comes up.  If the
gnome-help screen is closed and the "Help" button is again clicked during the
current frysk activation, no backtraces occur no matter how many times this
happens.  The backtrace seems to only occur on the very first activation of the
gnome-help.

-- 
           Summary: FryskHelpManager initial startup causes backtrace
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: rmoseley at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3927

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 14:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3907] FryskHelpManager uses Runtime.exec
In-Reply-To: <20070123172147.3907.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070123172147.3907.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126145424.5007.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-01-26 14:54 -------
Converted to use frysk.sys.Fork.daemon().  Now causes backtraces on initial
activation.  This has been enumerated in bz #3927.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3907

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 14:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126145425.5015.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3398 depends on bug 3907, which changed state.

Bug 3907 Summary: FryskHelpManager uses Runtime.exec
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3907

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 14:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126145717.5936.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3398 depends on bug 3908, which changed state.

Bug 3908 Summary: help doesn't work from build tree
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3908

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 14:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3908] help doesn't work from build tree
In-Reply-To: <20070123172713.3908.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070123172713.3908.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126145716.5928.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-01-26 14:57 -------
Modified Gui.java to pass the correct path to FryskGui.java and frysk.java. 
This path is passed to FryskHelpManager now.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3908

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 19:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3928] New: Pty.cxx frysk::sys::Pty::setUpPtyForConsole uses system()  calls to set tty properties
Message-ID: <20070126190257.3928.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

This might call problems with SIGCHLD and Frysk. Code snippet below.

        char prefix[30] = "stty -F ";
        char *pts_name = ptsname(master);
        char cmd[60];
         
        if (pts_name != NULL)
        {
                strcat(prefix, pts_name);
                strcpy(cmd, prefix);
                strcat(cmd, " -icanon min 1");
                system(cmd);
    
                strcpy(cmd, prefix);
                strcat(cmd, " -echo");
                system(cmd);
        }

-- 
           Summary: Pty.cxx frysk::sys::Pty::setUpPtyForConsole uses
                    system()  calls to set tty properties
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3928

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 19:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3929] New: TestRunner help Usage statement incorrect
Message-ID: <20070126193517.3929.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

[pmuldoon@localhost frysk-core]$ ./TestRunner -help
Usage: [ -c <console-level> ] [ -l <log-level> ] [ -r <repeat-count> ] [ 
--arch <arch>] [ -n ] [ --stress ] [ --all ] [-o spec [-o spec [-o spec...]]] 
[-i spec [-i spec [-i spec...]]] [--timeout <timeout>] [ class ... ]

(help long form follows)

-o looks wrong
-i looks wrong
-c should be deleted?
-l should be deleted?

-- 
           Summary: TestRunner help Usage statement incorrect
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3929

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 19:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3929] TestRunner help Usage statement incorrect
In-Reply-To: <20070126193517.3929.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070126193517.3929.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126193553.16983.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-26 19:35 -------
--timeout is two -- instead of -

Actually I have no idea why some options are -- and some -, so this might be
correct.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3929

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 19:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3928] Pty.cxx frysk::sys::Pty::setUpPtyForConsole uses system()  calls to set tty properties
In-Reply-To: <20070126190257.3928.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070126190257.3928.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126194235.21273.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-01-26 19:42 -------
What the system() stuff below is doing is setting the way the tty works.  It
could be done w/o system() by using terminal control ops similar to the following:

{
  struct termios tio;

  if (0 > tcgetattr(fd, *tio)) return -1;

  tio.c_lflag |= ICANON | ECHO;
  tio.c_cc[VMIN] = 1;

  if (0 < tcsetattr(fd, TCSANOW, ,&tio)) return -1;

  return 0;
}

where fd is the file descriptor associated with pts_name.

There are a few other wrinkles that might be relevant, but they'd depend on what
else is going on.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3928

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 20:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3929] TestRunner help Usage statement incorrect
In-Reply-To: <20070126193517.3929.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070126193517.3929.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126201812.16494.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3929

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Jan 26 22:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3910] Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
In-Reply-To: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070126225106.6011.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-26 22:51 -------
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@1dcf50,pid=23254,tid=23254,state=detached} handleAttach
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@1dcf50,pid=23254,tid=23254,state=detached} sendAttach
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc@172140,pid=23254,oldState=Attaching.ToMainTask}
handleAddObservation
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld@1a6ab0,sig=Sig_CHLD} execute
frysk.sys.Wait pid 0 errno 0 (Success)
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld@1a6ab0,sig=Sig_CHLD} execute
frysk.sys.Wait pid 0 errno 0 (Success)

This is an attempt at starting an attatch.  sendAttach==ptrace(PT_ATTACH), then
it gets two SIGCHLD's but waitpid returns zip on both occasions.

Is this a child process or daemon process - might affect things.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 29 15:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3910] Under 2.6.18-1.3002.el5 ProcBlockAction stalls (forever) with a proc object that has had assertSendStop() called
In-Reply-To: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070123224345.3910.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070129154540.12654.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-29 15:45 -------
The child is started with DetachedAckProcess().

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3910

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 29 17:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3927] FryskHelpManager initial startup causes backtrace
In-Reply-To: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070129171010.5384.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-29 17:10 -------
I think I know whats happening, and wow, that means frysk's core is being pretty
agressive!

- the desktop thread calls frysk.sys.Fork.daemon which: does a vfork as the
first step in creating a daemon, and then does a waitpid on the child

- meanwhile the core thread sees the SIGCHLD for that same waitpid and grabs it

- this leaves the desktop process's waitpid with nothing to wait for, hence the
error

That means the core is going to need to directly handle the child create, and
the help code just request it.

As a way of confirming this, try using:

  frysk.proc.Host.requestCreateAttachedProc (String[] args, null)

i.e., no observer.  It should create the process and then immediatly detach from
it.  Perhaps a:

  frysk.proc.Host.requestCreateDaemonProc (String[] args)

should be added.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3927

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 29 18:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3932] New: fcatch may not exit on some programs
Message-ID: <20070129181037.3932.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

[pmuldoon@localhost bindir]$ gcc -g  ~/segfault.c -o ~/segfault -lpthread
[pmuldoon@localhost bindir]$ fcatch ~/segfault
Print Entry Thread 1
 
Print Entry Thread 2
 
SIGSEGV detected: dumping stack trace
#0 0x804851f in main () from: /home/pmuldoon/segfault.c#36
#1 0x4da7ff2c in __libc_start_main ()
#2 0x8048411 in _start ()

fcatch does not exit, but seems to sit waiting hanging at the console.

System is Fedora Core 6

[pmuldoon@localhost frysk_bin]$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Jan 10 19:28:18 EST
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

-- 
           Summary: fcatch may not exit on some programs
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3932

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Jan 29 18:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3932] fcatch may not exit on some programs
In-Reply-To: <20070129181037.3932.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070129181037.3932.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070129181123.15658.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-29 18:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=1524)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1524&action=view)
The rather evil little segfaulter, added as an attachment.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3932

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 16:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3934] New: funit -c FINE missing
Message-ID: <20070130161440.3934.cagney@redhat.com>

The refactoring of the console logging code unfortunatly lost the most common
case: -c FINE.

For funit, and TestRunner, in addition to the --console MODULE=LEVEL, there
should be shorthand:

-- 
           Summary: funit -c FINE missing
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3934

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 16:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130161441.12246.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3934


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 16:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3935] New: Eventviewer occasionally crashes
Message-ID: <20070130164221.3935.mcvet@redhat.com>

With: (x86_64)

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

Not entirely reproducable all the time, but seems to occur more when a lot of 
processes are being shoved in there.

-- 
           Summary: Eventviewer occasionally crashes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3936] New: testDetachExitingMainTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)java.lang.RuntimeException: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3c796045,pid=5094,tid=5094,state=detaching} in state "detaching" did not handle handleDisappearedEvent
Message-ID: <20070130174947.3936.cagney@redhat.com>

On x86-64 machine at least:

1)
testDetachExitingMainTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)java.lang.RuntimeException:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3c796045,pid=5094,tid=5094,state=detaching} in state
"detaching" did not handle handleDisappearedEvent
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleDisappearedEvent(funit)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processDisappearedEvent(funit)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.disappeared(funit)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(funit)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.detach(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.detachExitingTask(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.testDetachExitingMainTask(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(funit)
   at funit.main(funit)
2)
testDetachExitingOtherTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)java.lang.RuntimeException:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3c795f7d,pid=5096,tid=5096,state=detaching} in state
"detaching" did not handle handleDisappearedEvent
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleDisappearedEvent(funit)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processDisappearedEvent(funit)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.disappeared(funit)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(funit)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.detach(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.detachExitingTask(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.testDetachExitingOtherTask(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(funit)
   at funit.main(funit)

-- 
           Summary: testDetachExitingMainTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)ja
                    va.lang.RuntimeException:
                    {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3c796045,pid=5094,tid=5094,s
                    tate=detaching} in state "detaching" did not handle
                    handleDisappearedEvent
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3385
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3936

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3385] [tracker] RHEL 5
In-Reply-To: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130174948.17960.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3936


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3385

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3936] testDetachExitingMainTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)java.lang.RuntimeException: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3c796045,pid=5094,tid=5094,state=detaching} in state "detaching" did not handle handleDisappearedEvent
In-Reply-To: <20070130174947.3936.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070130174947.3936.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130175135.18646.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 17:51 -------
RHEL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225448


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3936

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3934] funit -c FINE missing
In-Reply-To: <20070130161440.3934.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070130161440.3934.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130175255.19301.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3934

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3938] New: Core exception in Monitor
Message-ID: <20070130175739.3938.mcvet@redhat.com>

in the latest rpm - 12.22, if one saves a session as several observers attached 
to many processes, sometimes a core error dialog pops up with:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39aa16e5,pid=3361,tid=3361,state=running} in state 
"running" did not handle handleAttach

frysk.proc.State.unhandled(frysk)
frysk.proc.TaskState.handleAttach(frysk)
frysk.proc.Task.performAttach(frysk)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching.initialState(frysk)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$1.handleAddObservation(frysk)
frysk.proc.Proc.handleAddObservation(frysk)
frysk.proc.Proc$9.execute(frysk)
frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(frysk)
frysk.event.EventLoop.run(frysk)
frysk.gui.Gui$3.run(frysk)
java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: Core exception in Monitor
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3938

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3385] [tracker] RHEL 5
In-Reply-To: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130175715.20827.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3937


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3385

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3937] New: testBlockingFibonacciFork(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked)java.lang.RuntimeException: Unknown waitpid stopped event (process 5342)
Message-ID: <20070130175715.3937.cagney@redhat.com>

On at least x86-64 RHEL.

At a technical level, this makes little sense, frysk should know about all
children suggesting that waitpid event is stray.

3)
testBlockingFibonacciFork(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked)java.lang.RuntimeException:
Unknown waitpid stopped event (process 5342)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(funit)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(funit)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked$BlockingFibonacci.<init>(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked$5$ForkFibonacci.<init>(funit)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked.testBlockingFibonacciFork(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(funit)
   at funit.main(funit)

-- 
           Summary: testBlockingFibonacciFork(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlo
                    cked)java.lang.RuntimeException: Unknown waitpid stopped
                    event (process 5342)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3385
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3937

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3939] New: Monitor aborts
Message-ID: <20070130175940.3939.mcvet@redhat.com>

Loading a session for the monitor with many processes and observers may crash 
with:

mcvet@warbird:~/workspace/build/frysk-gui/frysk/gui >> frysk
Unable to get host name or ip address from getHostAddress()/getHostName()
Unable to get host name or ip address from getHostAddress()/getHostName()

GLib-GObject-ERROR **: file gsignal.c: line 652 (emission_pop): should not be 
reached
aborting...
Aborted

mcvet@warbird:~/workspace/build/frysk-gui/frysk/gui >> rpm -q frysk-gnome
frysk-gnome-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6

-- 
           Summary: Monitor aborts
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3939

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 17:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3937] testBlockingFibonacciFork(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverBlocked)java.lang.RuntimeException: Unknown waitpid stopped event (process 5342)
In-Reply-To: <20070130175715.3937.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070130175715.3937.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130175901.22118.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 17:59 -------
RHEL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225449

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3937

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3940] New: Clicking on process dialog in eventviewer prints errors to console
Message-ID: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>

If there are numerous processes listed in the upper left hand window of the 
monitor, and the user randomly starts clicking rows in the tree, the following 
is repeated to console:

java.lang.RuntimeException: Trying to set widget when widget is already set.
   at frysk.gui.monitor.GuiData.setWidget(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.StatusWidget.addTask(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.StatusWidget.initThreads(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.StatusWidget.<init>(frysk)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.SessionProcTreeView$1.selectionChangedEvent(frysk)
   at org.gnu.gtk.TreeSelection.fireSelectionEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.TreeSelection.handleChanged(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(frysk)
   at frysk.main(frysk)

frysk-gnome-0.0.1.2006.12.22.rh1-1.fc6

-- 
           Summary: Clicking on process dialog in eventviewer prints errors
                    to console
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3940

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3940] Clicking on process dialog in eventviewer prints errors to console
In-Reply-To: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130180320.25418.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 18:03 -------
Appears to happen sporadically.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3940

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3942] New: Monitor quits with "X System Error"
Message-ID: <20070130180640.3942.mcvet@redhat.com>

x86_64, happens very rarely. Attempting to open a saved session in the monitor:

The program 'Frysk' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)'.
  (Details: serial 7425 error_code 1 request_code 0 minor_code 0)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)

mcvet@warbird:~/workspace/build/frysk-gui/frysk/gui >> X -version

X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.9-42.ELsmp x86_64 Red Hat, Inc.
Current Operating System: Linux warbird 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Jan 10 
18:50:56 EST 2007 x86_64
Build Date: 09 January 2007
Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.1.1-47.4.fc6 
        Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
        to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present

-- 
           Summary: Monitor quits with "X System Error"
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3942

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3941] New: 1) testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: section-1-alignment expected:<0> but was:<4>
Message-ID: <20070130180550.3941.cagney@redhat.com>

On x86-64 RHEL at least:

1) testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
section-1-alignment expected:<0> but was:<4>
   at lib.elf.tests.TestElf.testObjectFile(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(funit)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(funit)
   at funit.main(funit)

-- 
           Summary: 1)
                    testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.Ass
                    ertionFailedError: section-1-alignment expected:<0> but
                    was:<4>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3941

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3941] 1) testObjectFile(lib.elf.tests.TestElf)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: section-1-alignment expected:<0> but was:<4>
In-Reply-To: <20070130180550.3941.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070130180550.3941.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130180757.3036.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 18:07 -------
RHEL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225453

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |3385
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3941

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3940] Clicking on process dialog in eventviewer prints errors to console
In-Reply-To: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130181600.8612.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 18:16 -------
I tried this and can't repo. Is this x86_64?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3940

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3940] Clicking on process dialog in eventviewer prints errors to console
In-Reply-To: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070130180220.3940.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130181830.9016.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-01-30 18:18 -------
Yup, 64. But I can't get it every time; I need to make a complicated session, 
save it, and close and re-open it several times to get it

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3940

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Jan 30 18:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070130182433.12224.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2242 depends on bug 3934, which changed state.

Bug 3934 Summary: funit -c FINE missing
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3934

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 15:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131150118.23533.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 1571, which changed state.

Bug 1571 Summary: TreeView bug
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1571

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 15:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131154728.25060.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2245 depends on bug 2915, which changed state.

Bug 2915 Summary: ftrace misses exec call
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2915

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 15:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131155600.27392.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2245 depends on bug 2957, which changed state.

Bug 2957 Summary: testCloneSyscall(frysk.proc.TestTaskSyscallObserver)java.lang.RuntimeException: clone's parent in unexpected state runningInSyscall
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2957

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 15:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3212] Eventviewer Tracker
In-Reply-To: <20060914203904.3212.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20060914203904.3212.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131155726.28028.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3212 depends on bug 3882, which changed state.

Bug 3882 Summary: EventViewer TimeLines do not provide a11y info
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3882

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3212

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 16:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3947] New: fstack tracing with libunwind vs dwfl.
Message-ID: <20070131164949.3947.npremji@redhat.com>

fstack with libunwind stack tracing a bash shell provides the following:
./frysk-core/frysk/bindir fstack 30546
Task #30546
#0 0x00970402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x00a18a33 in waitpid ()
#2 0x0807945d in  ()
#3 0x0807b288 in wait_for ()
#4 0x0806e33c in execute_command_internal ()
#5 0x0806ed73 in execute_command ()
#6 0x0806fb02 in  ()
#7 0x0806db15 in execute_command_internal ()
#8 0x0806ed73 in execute_command ()
#9 0x0805e898 in reader_loop ()
#10 0x0805e397 in main ()
#11 0x009a3724 in __libc_start_main ()
#12 0x0805bff1 in _start ()

dwfl provides:
./frysk-core/frysk/bindir fstack 30546
Task #30546
#0 0x00970402 in [unknown]
#1 0x00a18a33 in __waitpid_nocancel ()
#2 0x0807945d in [unknown]
#3 0x0807b288 in wait_for ()
#4 0x0806e33c in execute_command_internal ()
#5 0x0806ed73 in execute_command ()
#6 0x0805e898 in reader_loop ()
#7 0x0805e397 in main ()
#8 0x009a3724 in __libc_start_main ()
#9 0x0805bff1 in [unknown]

and pstack provides:
pstack 30546
#0  0x00970402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1  0x00a18a33 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x0807945d in get_job_by_pid ()
#3  0x0807b288 in wait_for ()
#4  0x0806e33c in execute_command_internal ()
#5  0x0806ed73 in execute_command ()
#6  0x0805e898 in reader_loop ()
#7  0x0805e397 in main ()

-- 
           Summary: fstack tracing with libunwind vs dwfl.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3947

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 17:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3948] New: testcase LinuxDeadTask getMemory()
Message-ID: <20070131172048.3948.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

When a task.getMemory() occurs on a LinuxDeadTask, the operation will be handled
and redirected to a corefile. This requires a memory offset -> file offset
adjustment as well as dealing with endian/alignment issues.

The operation must be transparent to the abstract class Task.

-- 
           Summary: testcase LinuxDeadTask getMemory()
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1595
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3948

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 17:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1595] [tracker] core file support
In-Reply-To: <20051028213903.1595.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028213903.1595.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131172050.22277.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3948


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1595

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 20:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3949] New: utilities documentation needs cleanup.
Message-ID: <20070131203909.3949.npremji@redhat.com>

For the command line utilities: fstack, ftrace, fstep, fcatch and fcore: The SEE
ALSO sections need to be update to include all the other programs for each program.

Also some of the command line utilities refer to themselves in the
description/name portions.
Example: "fstack runs frysk fstack stack tracing utilitiy" should not have
second fstack.

Also some example sections only have the command in them. Should also have the
arguments that must be passed.

-- 
           Summary: utilities documentation needs cleanup.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3389
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 20:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3949] utilities documentation needs cleanup.
In-Reply-To: <20070131203909.3949.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070131203909.3949.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131203935.3370.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 20:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3389] [tracker] Documentation
In-Reply-To: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131203909.2947.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3949


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3389

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 20:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3950] New: fstack anc fcore command line utilities hang when attempting to attach to unowned process. No warnings.
Message-ID: <20070131204837.3950.npremji@redhat.com>

fstack and fcore hang when attempting to attach to a process not owned by the user.

Should put up a warning and then exit.

-- 
           Summary: fstack anc fcore command line utilities hang when
                    attempting to attach to unowned process. No warnings.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3950

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 20:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3389] [tracker] Documentation
In-Reply-To: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131205637.8803.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3389 depends on bug 3949, which changed state.

Bug 3949 Summary: utilities documentation needs cleanup.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3389

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 21:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3389] [tracker] Documentation
In-Reply-To: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131211514.25004.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3389 depends on bug 3949, which changed state.

Bug 3949 Summary: utilities documentation needs cleanup.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3389

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 21:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3927] FryskHelpManager initial startup causes backtrace
In-Reply-To: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131211547.25490.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 21:15 -------
I converted to using a call to "Manager.host.requestCreateAttachedProc(args,
null);" to activate the help.  It comes up OK, but now when the help is
terminated I get this from the core:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@f52690,pid=31805,tid=31805,state=detached} in state
"detached" did not handle handleTerminatedEvent

java.lang.RuntimeException:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@f52690,pid=31805,tid=31805,state=detached} in state
"detached" did not handle handleTerminatedEvent
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.terminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7)

I suspect passing a "null" in as the type of observer to attach is throwing it
off.  Looks like we do need a frysk.proc.Host.requestCreateDaemonProc (String[]
args) method.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3927

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 21:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3927] FryskHelpManager initial startup causes backtrace
In-Reply-To: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070126145142.3927.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131213915.3794.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 21:39 -------
That's a new and obscure bug.

If a child process (not a daemon, not a random process) becomes detached and
then exits, frysk gets confused.

It occures because frysk still gets the waitpid event for the child's exit, even
though frysk isn't attached.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |2248
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3927

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221527.21090.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 22:15 -------
Fixes to make exit47 test case pass, do not fix this bug.  Assuming a separate
problem and re-splitting.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|3489                        |2654, 3385
              nThis|                            |
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2654] [tracker] Fedora Core 6
In-Reply-To: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221628.21418.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2654 depends on bug 3640, which changed state.

Bug 3640 Summary: fc6:  testTerminatingKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3640

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2654

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3385] [tracker] RHEL 5
In-Reply-To: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221628.21414.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3385 depends on bug 3640, which changed state.

Bug 3640 Summary: fc6:  testTerminatingKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3640

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3385

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221628.21403.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 22:16 -------
*** Bug 3640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3640] fc6:  testTerminatingKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204181005.3640.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204181005.3640.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221554.21244.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 22:15 -------
Fixes to make exit47 test case pass, do not fix this bug.  Assuming a separate
problem and re-splitting.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|3489                        |2654, 3385
              nThis|                            |
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3640

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3640] fc6:  testTerminatingKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204181005.3640.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204181005.3640.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131221627.21396.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 22:16 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3639 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3640

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Jan 31 22:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070131222201.23727.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-01-31 22:22 -------
RHEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226684

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  1 02:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3951] New: Eventviewer needs a "clean space" buffer at the right edge
Message-ID: <20070201024653.3951.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

Right now the blue event dot is plotted right at the very far right edge of the
eventviewer. On syscalls observers (and other observers), the angled text is
truncated at the far right edge of the eventviewer.

-- 
           Summary: Eventviewer needs a "clean space" buffer at the right
                    edge
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3951

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  1 20:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070201203152.3694.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-01 20:31 -------
Seeing this problem as well.  As far as I can determine right now, it is test
frysk2130/strace-clone-exec.sh causing it.  It is mostly reproducible, though I
have been able to do full 'make check' runs on my frysk build that do not
trigger it, occasionally.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  1 20:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070201204009.7695.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-01 20:40 -------
Quick follow-up - did a reboot and executed just the strace-clone-exec.sh test
from the command line.  This also triggered the kernel bug, on FC6 with the
2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 kernel.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  1 21:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070201214557.12228.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-01 21:45 -------
Anyone out there with the latest RHEL5 beta installed who could verify whether
this problem occurs there also?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3620] [tracker] Fedora Core 7
In-Reply-To: <20061129205651.3620.frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
References: <20061129205651.3620.frysk-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Message-ID: <20070202124050.22737.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:40 -------
Some issues with regard to moving to new gcj (1.5 features), not all blockers:

- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28533
  [ecj] Default warnings
- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588
  gcj compiles large jars much slower
- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604
  Unable to coalesce ssa_names <x>  and <y>  which are marked as MUST COALESCE
(CppTreeParser)
- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30607
  "gcj -I x -C doesn't include x as source dir search patch"
- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30585
  "gcj doesn't accept -Wall and -Werror anymore"

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3620

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1603] single step a normal instruction
In-Reply-To: <20051029025232.1603.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029025232.1603.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202124742.26302.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:47 -------
Implemented and tested by frysk/proc/TestTaskObserverInstruction.java

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1603

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1618] insert and hit a global breakpoint
In-Reply-To: <20051029040747.1618.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029040747.1618.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202125406.31390.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:54 -------
Implemented and tested by frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1618

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1619] insert, hit, then skip a global breakpoint
In-Reply-To: <20051029040957.1619.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029040957.1619.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202125509.31715.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:55 -------
Implemented and tested by frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1619

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1620] insert multiple breakpoints; hit each in correct sequence
In-Reply-To: <20051029041137.1620.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029041137.1620.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202125544.31886.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:55 -------
Implemented and tested by frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1620

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 12:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1621] step over a global breakpoint
In-Reply-To: <20051029041241.1621.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029041241.1621.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202125627.32097.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 12:56 -------
Implemented and tested by frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1621

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 13:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2356] During a bash fork() stress test, frysk throws: did not handle PerformRemoval exception
In-Reply-To: <20060219171722.2356.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20060219171722.2356.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202130924.10907.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 13:09 -------
This still happens although the exception has changed:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@2fb0230,pid=4132,tid=4132,state=detached} in state
"detached" did not handle handleStoppedEvent

java.lang.RuntimeException:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@2fb0230,pid=4132,tid=4132,state=detached} in state
"detached" did not handle handleStoppedEvent
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleStoppedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processStoppedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2356

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 13:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2732] frysk fails when attaching to a proc that does a lot of forking.
In-Reply-To: <20060607172642.2732.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20060607172642.2732.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202131810.13950.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 13:18 -------
Seems to work fine here. But note that I didn't know what arguments to give
forker and that there isn't an exit notification observer anymore in the gui.
Running it with "./forker 0 24" and selecting the Terminating and Fork observers
gives lots of events.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2732

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 13:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1553] [tracker] Task and Proc State Machines
In-Reply-To: <20051026155249.1553.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051026155249.1553.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202132200.15026.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1553 depends on bug 2744, which changed state.

Bug 2744 Summary: testDetachClone(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserverDetach)java.lang.RuntimeException: {frysk.proc.LinuxTask@1a8ed80,pid=28261,tid=28261,state=running} in state
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2744

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1553

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 13:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2818] When removing an observer Frysk throws an unhandled state exception
In-Reply-To: <20060622153914.2818.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060622153914.2818.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202132502.16198.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 13:25 -------
I believe this was fixed by:

2006-10-04  Nurdin Premji <npremji@redhat.com>

        [...]
        * TaskState.java (BlockedSignal:handleDeleteObserver): Added.
        (BlockedSignal:handleDetach): Added.

Could you retests and/or provide a testcase?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2818

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 13:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2956] test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachRapidlyCloningMainTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
In-Reply-To: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070202134120.21194.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 13:41 -------
This stress tests seems to behave a lot better now. But occasionally it gets
into some loop and doesn't stop at all. This however seems unrepeatable with -c
FINE (sigh).

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 14:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2952] testForking(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachSignaledTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (addFork (Sig_USR1,Sig_USR2))
In-Reply-To: <20060722125703.2952.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060722125703.2952.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202142750.17015.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 14:27 -------
This test seems to pass on x86 and x86_64 but sometimes gives the following
warnings:

2-Feb-07 9:25:11 AM frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running handleStoppedEvent
WARNING: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@6dda10,pid=6845,tid=6845,state=running}
Unhandled real stop event


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2952

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 14:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2953] testCloning(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachSignaledTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (addClone (Sig_USR1,Sig_USR2))
In-Reply-To: <20060722125934.2953.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060722125934.2953.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202142923.19325.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 14:29 -------
Like bug #2952. This test seems to pass on x86 and x86_64 but sometimes gives
the following warnings:

2-Feb-07 9:25:11 AM frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running handleStoppedEvent
WARNING: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@6dda10,pid=6845,tid=6845,state=running}
Unhandled real stop event


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2953

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 14:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1987] Cascading observers do not work
In-Reply-To: <20051206212253.1987.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20051206212253.1987.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202143611.21818.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 14:36 -------
Do we have a specific testcase for this?
If this bug is just about being able to add observers in the running state then
that works now.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1987

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2956] test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachRapidlyCloningMainTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
In-Reply-To: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070202152411.19035.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-02 15:24 -------
A loop (with CPU usage pegged) or a hang (sitting in the event loop or waitpid)?


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1582] [tracker] Process Model - frysk.proc
In-Reply-To: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202152701.21234.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1582 depends on bug 2277, which changed state.

Bug 2277 Summary: testAttachedMultipleExec(frysk.proc.TestExec)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: pid after attached multiple clone exec expected:<26993> but was:<26994>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2277

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1582

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2277] testAttachedMultipleExec(frysk.proc.TestExec)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: pid after attached multiple clone exec expected:<26993> but was:<26994>
In-Reply-To: <20060206160556.2277.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060206160556.2277.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202152659.21219.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 15:26 -------
This must have been fixed some time ago. I am unable to replicate it on either
x86 or x86_64. Please reopen if it isn't fixed for you.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2277

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2956] test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachRapidlyCloningMainTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
In-Reply-To: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070202153205.24129.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 15:32 -------
CPU usage pegged

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2468] test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachManyTasks)java.lang.RuntimeException: {frysk.proc.LinuxTask@409cd0,id={TaskId,12283},state=blockedContinue} in state "BlockedSignal" did not handle PerformDetach
In-Reply-To: <20060318005915.2468.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060318005915.2468.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202153831.26078.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 15:38 -------
This seems to have been fixed. Not reproducable anymore on x86 and x86_64.
I'll reenable the test.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2468

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1582] [tracker] Process Model - frysk.proc
In-Reply-To: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202153831.26090.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1582 depends on bug 2468, which changed state.

Bug 2468 Summary: test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachManyTasks)java.lang.RuntimeException: {frysk.proc.LinuxTask@409cd0,id={TaskId,12283},state=blockedContinue} in state "BlockedSignal" did not handle PerformDetach
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2468

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1582

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 15:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3187] testProcRefresh and testExitLoosesChild fail randomly on cvs head(Sep. 8)
In-Reply-To: <20060908114900.3187.qiyaoltc@cn.ibm.com>
References: <20060908114900.3187.qiyaoltc@cn.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20070202154306.27181.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-02 15:43 -------
I am still very occasionally seeing this.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3187

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 16:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3959] New: Vte read error
Message-ID: <20070202165926.3959.swagiaal@redhat.com>

some times when FryskGui is started, it starts infinitly printing out these
error messages:


(Frysk:19634): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Is a directory.

(Frysk:19634): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Is a directory.

(Frysk:19634): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Bad file descriptor.

(Frysk:19634): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Bad file descriptor.

(Frysk:19634): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Is a directory.

-- 
           Summary: Vte read error
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2043
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3959

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 16:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2043] vte tracker
In-Reply-To: <20051213175622.2043.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051213175622.2043.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202165926.8128.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3959


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 21:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2956] test(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachRapidlyCloningMainTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
In-Reply-To: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060722150357.2956.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070202205954.19243.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-02 20:59 -------
Sorry, should be more precice.  CPU pegged by the test program or frysk, i.e.,
is frysk sleeping?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 21:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1831] online gnome help system
In-Reply-To: <20051108192528.1831.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051108192528.1831.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202212000.537.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-02-02 21:20 -------
Features to implement this are in the current cvs HEAD.  Added the class
FryskHelpManager.  Now need to add connections to the online help from the
various screens.  We need to make sure yelp is included on one of the
dependencies in the spec file for frysk-gnome.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|rmoseley at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1831

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 21:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1694] Documentation
In-Reply-To: <20051030003319.1694.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051030003319.1694.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202212242.1651.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-02-02 21:22 -------
Two types of documentation have been generated, online and a odf/odt version and
these are checked into the current repository.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1694

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 21:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202212245.1671.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 1694, which changed state.

Bug 1694 Summary: Documentation
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1694

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  2 21:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] Memory leakage
In-Reply-To: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070202213454.6613.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-02-02 21:34 -------
Here are more observations on memory usage by the source window.  These results
were taken using "top" on a 2GHz P4 with 1GB of memory running FC5 with kernel
2.6.18-1.2257.fc5.  Of particular interest were the memory readings provided by
"top" for its Virtual, Resident and Shared columns.

The scenario is this:  I activated Frysk and took a measurement, then brought up
the source window and took a measurement and then stepped the program 10 times
taking two memory measurements after each step, with ~2 minutes between
measurements. An interesting phenomena was observed which is the reason 2
measurements were taken between each step.  It turns out there is a significance
difference between the virtual memory measurment right after the "step" and the
virtual memory measurement ~2 minutes after the step, which I suppose can be
attributed to GC(garbage collection).

The measurement taken immediately after the step was often 2-3 MB higher than
the measurement taken ~2 minutes later for the same step.  Here is a table of
the measurements:

   Virtual Memory        Resident     Shared
 after  ~2 min. later
 137MB     same             40          23       Initial startup of Frysk UI
 139MB     same             41          23       Showing debug process list
 155MB     152MB            44          25       Activated source window
 156MB     153MB            44          25       after 1 step
 158MB     155MB            45          25       after 2 steps
 160MB     157MB            45          25       after 3 steps
 161MB     158MB            45          25       after 4 steps       
 163MB     160MB            45          25       after 5 steps
 165MB     162MB            46          26       after 6 steps
 167MB     164MB            46          26       after 7 steps
 168MB     165MB            46          26       after 8 steps
 170MB     167MB            47          26       after 9 steps
 172MB     169MB            47          26       after 10 steps
 
 I also ran the test a different way by just doing 10 steps as quickly as I
could.  The initial virtual memory jumped to 192MB but fell back to 169MB within
2 minutes, the same as the memory measurement for step 10 above.
 
 Another phenomema I observed is that when the source window is exited, the
memory measured the last time stays the same, it does not go away unless all of
frysk is exited.  On top of that, if another source window is activated with the
same source code the memory useage jumps by another 4 MB over the last reading.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 01:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3962] New: Monitor is spinning processor in the background
Message-ID: <20070203014843.3962.mcvet@redhat.com>

Open a session with a few processes and observers; wait a minute, processor 
then appear to start running at 100%.

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND            
 5883 mcvet     25   0  384m  89m  46m R 94.2  9.0   1:05.41 FryskGui           
 2255 root      15   0  128m  21m 5800 S  3.7  2.2   3:21.08 Xorg               
 2459 mcvet     15   0  270m  19m 5948 R  1.3  1.9   0:09.37 gnome-terminal     
 2362 mcvet     15   0  151m 6404 4616 S  0.3  0.6   0:04.84 metacity

-- 
           Summary: Monitor is spinning processor in the background
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3962

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 01:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3963] New: Frysk Terminal randomly broken
Message-ID: <20070203015137.3963.mcvet@redhat.com>

Occasionally after firing up the monitor, the frysk terminal will have a cursor 
but no text, and is unresponsive. Clicking on the terminal results in the 
following printed to console:

java.lang.Exception: giounix.c:400Error while getting flags for FD: Bad file 
descriptor (9)

   at org.gnu.glib.GObject.printStackTrace(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: Frysk Terminal randomly broken
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3963

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 01:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3963] Frysk Terminal randomly broken
In-Reply-To: <20070203015137.3963.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070203015137.3963.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070203015434.13225.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-03 01:54 -------
Just tried again; terminal opened up with random characters printed:

      
           @                           
                     
       @                                          !   ??????&#9146;       
@@     @      P                            +   
                                             &#144;@     &#144;      ??         

                3             &#9474;@     &#9474;      ??              

               ;   ??????&#9146;       &#9148;-@     &#9148;-      ??
                           
H   ??????&#9146;       0/@     0/                 
                 W             P/
@     P/      0                           &#9618;             &#128;/@     &#128;/      
         
            
           @                           
                     
       @                                          !   ??????&#9146;       
@@     @      P                            +   
                                             &#144;@     &#144;      ??         

                3             &#9474;@     &#9474;      ??              

               ;   ??????&#9146;       &#9148;-@     &#9148;-      ??
                           
H   ??????&#9146;       0/@     0/                 
                 W             P/
@     P/      0                           &#9618;             &#128;/@     &#128;/      
         
                                                                           
       &#9488;   
          &#144;C@     &#144;C                                    ??   
   
                                &#9472;   
           Q@      Q      
&#152;T                             &#9516;   
          ????@     ????                     
               ??   
          ????@     ????      @                              
&#133;   
   
                                                                            
       &#9488;   
          &#144;C@     &#144;C                                    ??   
   
                                &#9472;   
           Q@      Q      
&#152;T                             &#9516;   
          ????@     ????                     
               ??   
          ????@     ????      @                              
&#133;   
          

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3963

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 02:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3964] New: Opening Monitor gives new Core error:
Message-ID: <20070203015958.3964.mcvet@redhat.com>

Just opening a previous session:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@395099d5,pid=5988,tid=5988,state=StartMainTask.wantToAttachContinue}
 in state "StartMainTask.wantToAttachContinue" did not handle 
handleTerminatedEvent

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@395099d5,pid=5988,tid=5988,state=StartMainTask.wantToAttachContinue}
 in state "StartMainTask.wantToAttachContinue" did not handle 
handleTerminatedEvent
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.terminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: Opening Monitor gives new Core error:
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3964

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 02:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3964] Opening Monitor gives new Core error:
In-Reply-To: <20070203015958.3964.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070203015958.3964.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070203020040.25292.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-03 02:00 -------
Also printed to console:

java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/mcvet/.frysk/Sessions (Is a directory)
   at gnu.java.nio.channels.FileChannelImpl.open(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at gnu.java.nio.channels.FileChannelImpl.<init>(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at gnu.java.nio.channels.FileChannelImpl.create(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.io.FileOutputStream.<init>(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.io.FileWriter.<init>(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.ObjectFactory.exportNode(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.sessions.SessionManager.save(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.druid.CreateFryskSessionDruid$12.buttonEvent(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.fireButtonEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.handleClick(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

(Frysk:5983): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading PTY size, using defaults: 
Inappropriate ioctl for device.

(Frysk:5983): Vte-WARNING **: Error setting PTY size: Inappropriate ioctl for 
device.

(Frysk:5983): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading PTY size, using defaults: 
Inappropriate ioctl for device.
freopen: No such file or directory


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3964

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 02:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070203023439.9151.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-03 02:34 -------
This is actual a kernel bug (as stated in the original bug that prompted this
testcase to be added - #2130).  However, note that the testcase is *not* testing
the kernel bug in the sense that the testcase passes happily while it still
often (but not always) triggers the kernel bug.

So, noteworthy info:
- This is definitely a kernel bug
- The test case passes even if the kernel bug is triggered
- The kernel bug is not 100% reproducible - it sometimes takes multiple attempts

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb  3 20:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3967] New: Frysk spawns lots of shells that keep running after it closes
Message-ID: <20070203205848.3967.mcvet@redhat.com>

I suspect its the terminal in the monitor; after doing a whole lot of testing 
(read: opening and closing the monitor a lot) I noticed that the number of 
shells keeps increasing. Now:

mcvet@warbird:~ >> ps aux |grep /bin/sh
root      2339  0.0  0.0  65000  1252 ?        Ss   10:40   0:00 /bin/sh /etc/
X11/prefdm -nodaemon
mcvet      2916  0.0  0.0  62912  1244 ?        S    10:42   0:00 /bin/sh /usr/
lib64/thunderbird-1.5.0.9/thunderbird
mcvet      2934  0.0  0.0  62912  1280 ?        S    10:42   0:00 /bin/sh /usr/
lib64/thunderbird-1.5.0.9/run-mozilla.sh /usr/lib64/thunderbird-1.5.0.9/
thunderbird-bin
mcvet      5340  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/5    Ss+  11:21   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22086  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/6    Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22087  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/7    Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22088  0.0  0.0  65140  1500 pts/8    Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22089  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/9    Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22090  0.0  0.0  65140  1504 pts/10   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22091  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/11   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22092  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/12   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22093  0.0  0.0  65144  1500 pts/13   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22094  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/14   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22095  0.0  0.0  65140  1504 pts/15   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22096  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/16   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22097  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/17   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22098  0.0  0.0  65140  1500 pts/18   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22099  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/19   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22100  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/20   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22101  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/21   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22102  0.0  0.0  65140  1500 pts/22   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22103  0.0  0.0  65140  1500 pts/23   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22104  0.0  0.0  65140  1500 pts/24   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     22105  0.0  0.0  65144  1504 pts/25   Ss+  14:28   0:00 /bin/sh
mcvet     29141  0.0  0.0  60276   756 pts/26   R+   15:56   0:00 grep /bin/sh

-- 
           Summary: Frysk spawns lots of shells that keep running after it
                    closes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3967

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb  5 12:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3968] New: rt stackframe test funit-stackframe debug versions not build
Message-ID: <20070205120512.3968.mark@klomp.org>

frysk.rt.TestStackFrame testDebug, testNoDebug, testStripped, testStaticDebug,
testStaticNoDebug and testStaticStripped currently fail because
funit-stackframe-static-stripped, funit-stackframe-static-nodebug,
funit-stackframe-stripped and funit-stackframe-nodebug in frysk/pkglibdir aren't
currently build.

-- 
           Summary: rt stackframe test funit-stackframe debug versions not
                    build
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3968

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb  5 15:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3970] New: Proc.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceProcState)
Message-ID: <20070205154818.3970.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

As Proc is an abstance class, these states should be set in the subclass. In
this case, LinuxPtraceProc.

-- 
           Summary: Proc.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceProcState)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3970

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb  5 15:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3971] New: Task.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceTaskState)
Message-ID: <20070205154922.3971.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

As Task is an abstact class, states should be set in the subclass (LinuxPtraceTask)

-- 
           Summary: Task.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceTaskState)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3971

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb  5 15:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3970] Proc.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceProcState)
In-Reply-To: <20070205154818.3970.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070205154818.3970.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070205155315.5954.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-02-05 15:53 -------
2007-02-02  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>

	* Proc.java (Proc): Remove setting LinuxPtraceState states.
	Use getInitialState() to find initial states from sub-classes of
	Proc.
	(getInitialState): New. Abstract.
	* LinuxPtraceProc.java (getInitialState): New. Set initial state.
	* DummyProc.java (getInitialState): Ditto.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3970

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb  5 16:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3968] rt stackframe test funit-stackframe debug versions not build
In-Reply-To: <20070205120512.3968.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070205120512.3968.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070205161806.26927.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3968

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 14:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206143046.30338.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3977


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 14:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3977] New: tarball contains generated test-core
Message-ID: <20070206143043.3977.skasal@redhat.com>

The source tree contains two *.bz2.uu files (helloworld.o.bz2.uu, test-core.bz2.uu).
The generated tarball contains not only these files, but also the corresponding
generated ones (helloworld.o, test-core).

This can be fixed in Makefile.gen.sh.  (If it is planned to have more *.bz2.uu
files in the source tree.)

Alternatively, these two files could be handled in frysk-imports/Makefile.am, if
this is a special case and not a general pattern.

I do not know which of these two is better, help welcome.

-- 
           Summary: tarball contains generated test-core
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: skasal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2235
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3977

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 15:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3942] Monitor quits with "X System Error"
In-Reply-To: <20070130180640.3942.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070130180640.3942.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206151451.25847.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-06 15:14 -------
Sami, I believe this has to do with the terminal threading problem you found 
the other day

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|swagiaal at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3942

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 15:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3977] tarball contains generated test-core
In-Reply-To: <20070206143043.3977.skasal@redhat.com>
References: <20070206143043.3977.skasal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206154051.3150.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-06 15:40 -------
The logic in Makefile.gen.sh was handling this with:

-> listing all data source files in EXTRA_DIST
-> list the data files to install in blah_DATA

sounds like it was changed.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3977

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 16:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2785] [tracker] elfutils
In-Reply-To: <20060616141629.2785.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060616141629.2785.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206160051.11822.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2785 depends on bug 3969, which changed state.

Bug 3969 Summary: tests/Makefile.am:37: `CFLAGS' is a user variable, you should not override it;
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3969

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2785

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 16:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206165202.10234.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3922, which changed state.

Bug 3922 Summary: Get rid of SourceWindow radio button from the session manager
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3922

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 17:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206172251.2674.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3977, which changed state.

Bug 3977 Summary: tarball contains generated test-core
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3977

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 17:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3977] tarball contains generated test-core
In-Reply-To: <20070206143043.3977.skasal@redhat.com>
References: <20070206143043.3977.skasal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206172250.2671.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat dot com  2007-02-06 17:22 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> -> listing all data source files in EXTRA_DIST
> -> list the data files to install in blah_DATA
> 
> sounds like it was changed.

Indeed; I prefer the compact dist_blah_DATA in most cases.

I fixed Makefile.gen.sh so that for generated data files, nodist_blah_DATA is
used instead.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3977

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3979] New: testASMStepping fails in make check and intermittently with TestRunner 'testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping)'
Message-ID: <20070206182015.3979.npremji@redhat.com>

testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (Attempting to add instructionObserver)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStepping.testASMStepping(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

during a make check, but passes a great deal of the time on its own with TestRunner.

-- 
           Summary: testASMStepping fails in make check and intermittently
                    with TestRunner 'testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping)'
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3979

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 18:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3979] testASMStepping fails in make check and intermittently with TestRunner 'testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping)'
In-Reply-To: <20070206182015.3979.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070206182015.3979.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206183052.18423.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3979

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 19:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2654] [tracker] Fedora Core 6
In-Reply-To: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060511185815.2654.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206192128.21710.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2654 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.

Bug 3491 Summary: testTerm(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3491

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2654

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 19:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3385] [tracker] RHEL 5
In-Reply-To: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018174953.3385.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206192127.21707.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3385 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.

Bug 3491 Summary: testTerm(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3491

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3385

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 19:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1496] [tracker] Linux Kernel problems and requirements
In-Reply-To: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206192131.21740.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1496 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.

Bug 3491 Summary: testTerm(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3491

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1496

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 19:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1582] [tracker] Process Model - frysk.proc
In-Reply-To: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028180217.1582.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206192131.21737.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1582 depends on bug 3491, which changed state.

Bug 3491 Summary: testTerm(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (startChild (Sig_HUP))
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3491

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1582

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 21:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3981] New: Nullpointer at StackFrame.getSymbolName
Message-ID: <20070206211309.3981.mcvet@redhat.com>

Random stepping through a program with debuginfo:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.getSymbolName(FryskGui)
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.CurrentStackView.buildTree(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.CurrentStackView.resetView(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.populateStackBrowser(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$26.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: Nullpointer at StackFrame.getSymbolName
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3981

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 21:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3981] Nullpointer at StackFrame.getSymbolName
In-Reply-To: <20070206211309.3981.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070206211309.3981.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206213053.13661.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-06 21:30 -------
public String getSymbolName()
  {
    Dwfl dwfl = new Dwfl(task.getTid());
    
    return dwfl.getModule(getAddress()).getAddressName(getAddress());    
  }

This code makes the assumption that the DwflModule will never be null.

I'll fix it up in a sec

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3981

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206220009.28361.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3984


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3984] New: lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator uses Hashtable
Message-ID: <20070206220008.3984.cagney@redhat.com>

Hashtable's been subsumed by HashMap.

-- 
           Summary: lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator uses Hashtable
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3076
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3984

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206220208.29969.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3985


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3985] New: What is lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.arg_hash
Message-ID: <20070206220205.3985.cagney@redhat.com>

It's comment is:
    /* arg_hash maps long values corresponding to the addresses of an
     * UnwindArgs object and its CBarg and UPTarg fields, to the
     * UnwindArgs object itself.  This enables us to choose the right
     * argument to pass to callbacks even when one callback calls
     * another.  */
which makes me wonder if the binding is single threaded.

Can this bug and the comment be updated with a more detailed description.

-- 
           Summary: What is lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.arg_hash
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3076
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3985

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206220328.30452.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3983, which changed state.

Bug 3983 Summary: NullPointer in SourceWindow
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3983

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206220552.31811.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3986


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3986] New: frysk.cli.hpd using Hashtable
Message-ID: <20070206220551.3986.cagney@redhat.com>

It looks like a simple conversion to HashMap is possible.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.cli.hpd using Hashtable
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3986

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1542] Selectively adding task observers, when an Object implements multiple interfaces broken
In-Reply-To: <20051025143108.1542.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051025143108.1542.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206221004.7963.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3987


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1542

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3987] New: frysk.proc.IsaFactory uses Hashtable
Message-ID: <20070206221002.3987.cagney@redhat.com>

The newer HashMap is available now.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.proc.IsaFactory uses Hashtable
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1542
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3987

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070206221507.10431.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |3988


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb  6 22:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3988] New: frysk.gui using Hashtable
Message-ID: <20070206221505.3988.cagney@redhat.com>

There's the newer HashMap available.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.gui using Hashtable
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3988

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 14:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3994] New: Frysk Monitor - Terminal tab - exception in giounix.c: bad file descriptor
Message-ID: <20070207142640.3994.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

I get the following exception after a random number of input lines in the
Terminal tab of the Frysk Monitor:

java.lang.Exception: giounix.c:400Error while getting flags for FD: Bad file
descriptor (9)

   at org.gnu.glib.GObject.printStackTrace(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

Sometimes it is at the first command I try to type in it, sometimes it is after
20-30 commands.  But invariably, it ends up with this exception being printed at
some point in time.  Once this happens, and further attempts to enter input will
print out the exception.  Occasionally, it is followed by an endless sequence of
the following error message:

(Frysk:29204): Vte-WARNING **: Error reading from child: Is a directory.

-- 
           Summary: Frysk Monitor - Terminal tab - exception in giounix.c:
                    bad file descriptor
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3994

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 14:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3994] Frysk Monitor - Terminal tab - exception in giounix.c: bad file descriptor
In-Reply-To: <20070207142640.3994.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070207142640.3994.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070207143923.27867.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-07 14:39 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3963 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3994

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 14:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3963] Frysk Terminal randomly broken
In-Reply-To: <20070203015137.3963.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070203015137.3963.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207143926.27886.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-07 14:39 -------
*** Bug 3994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kris dot van dot hees at
                   |                            |oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3963

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 14:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] Memory leakage
In-Reply-To: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207144841.30676.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-07 14:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1541)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1541&action=view)
finalize() log file

A quick initial assessment shows that StackFrame.java, FrameCursor.java, and
the private class UnwindArgs in StackTraceCreator.java never seem to get
collected, while other objects associated with stepping do. 

The attached file is a log of finalize() calls from a variety of classes, some
from the DOM, Dwfl and DwflLine.

StackFrame is a pure Java file, FrameCursor and UnwindArgs have native
bindings; the DOM classes are pure Java and the Dwfl classes have native
bindings.

Failure to reach the finalize() for UnwindArgs means that native clean-up
functions like unw_destroy_addr_space are not called.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 15:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207150541.3921.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3380, which changed state.

Bug 3380 Summary: Frysk - built from CVS head 20061018 - debug an existing process twice = infinite loop exception
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3380

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 16:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] New: SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
Message-ID: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>

When you single step a SIGTRAP handler with ptrace() then it gets reset on some
kernels. This happens at least on 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6, but not on
2.6.17-1.2174_FC5. It also doesn't happen when doing a normal ptrace() CONT
through the signal handler.

-- 
           Summary: SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 16:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070207165142.18735.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-07 16:51 -------
Pushed to Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227693

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 19:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1553] [tracker] Task and Proc State Machines
In-Reply-To: <20051026155249.1553.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051026155249.1553.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207194430.19011.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1553 depends on bug 2804, which changed state.

Bug 2804 Summary: When an observer fires for gedit process - Frysk traps it, but then exceptions
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2804

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1553

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 21:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kgallowa at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] New: On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
Message-ID: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>

Because the x86 and x86_64 versions of libunwind use different sets of registers
for these architectures, the wrong values are passed to the accessreg callback.
 For example, when looking for the IP (RIP on 64, EIP on 32) it will still pass
16 to accessreg which corresponds to RIP on 64, but ST5 on 32.  For 32, since it
wants the IP, it should be passing 8, which corresponds to EIP.  Because of
this, it does not obtain the correct value for the IP, and the backtrace fails.
 To fix this, Frysk needs to check the elfclass of the binary and invoke the
proper version of libunwund (libunwund-x86 for 32, libuwind-x86_64 for 64).

-- 
           Summary: On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to
                    trace 32-bit programs
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kgallowa at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 21:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
In-Reply-To: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
References: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207214640.26070.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-02-07 21:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=1543)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1543&action=view)
failed testDebug output of 32 bit.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb  7 21:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
In-Reply-To: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
References: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070207214713.26265.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-02-07 21:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=1544)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1544&action=view)
successfull run of testDebug.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208020108.16225.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4001


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4001] New: Internal debugger error: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
Message-ID: <20070208020103.4001.cagney@redhat.com>

This is part of the output from running:
   $ ./TestRunner -c FINE frysk.bindir.TestFhd
java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
   at lib.dw.DwarfDie.get_scopes(fhpd)
   at lib.dw.DwarfDie.getScopes(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.ExprSymTab.getDie(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.ExprSymTab.get(fhpd)
   at frysk.expr.CppTreeParser.expr(fhpd)
   at frysk.expr.CppTreeParser.expr(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.print(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI$PrintHandler.handle(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI.execCommand(fhpd)
   at fhpd.main(fhpd)

-- 
           Summary: Internal debugger error:
                    java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4001

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208020640.15922.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4002


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4002] New: frysk.bindir.testRunCppParser has no installed test program
Message-ID: <20070208020640.4002.cagney@redhat.com>

This test depends on the program RunCppParser which is not installed.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.bindir.testRunCppParser has no installed test
                    program
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4002

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4003] New: running frysk.bindir.TestFhd scrambles tty
Message-ID: <20070208021622.4003.cagney@redhat.com>

Running either of the jline tests in frysk.bindir.TestFhd results in a scrambled
tty vis:
  $ ./TestRunner frysk.bindir.TestFhd
  ...
  $  $  $

-- 
           Summary: running frysk.bindir.TestFhd scrambles tty
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4003

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208021622.29794.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4003


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4004] New: frysk.expunit.Expect doesn't consume sigchlds
Message-ID: <20070208022349.4004.cagney@redhat.com>

The sigchild generated isn't consumed by frysk.expunit tests, leading to later
tests failing.

The waitpid event is consumed.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.expunit.Expect doesn't consume sigchlds
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2234,2243,2244
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4004

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208022352.992.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4004


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208022349.956.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4004


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2243] [tracker] fcore: standalone program for extracing a core file
In-Reply-To: <20060131173948.2243.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173948.2243.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208022351.978.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4004


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2243

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208023347.6847.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4005


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4005] New: Breakpoint tests very slow
Message-ID: <20070208023347.4005.cagney@redhat.com>

The junit testsuite is noticably slower with the breakpoint tests enabled.

-- 
           Summary: Breakpoint tests very slow
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2234
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4005

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208024236.21678.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4006


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 02:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4006] New: add --run-broken (or some such) option to funit
Message-ID: <20070208024234.4006.cagney@redhat.com>

Need to be able to enable broken tests without a re-compile.

-- 
           Summary: add --run-broken (or some such) option to funit
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2234
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4006

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 10:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4005] Breakpoint tests very slow
In-Reply-To: <20070208023347.4005.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208023347.4005.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208105335.22832.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4005

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 10:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4005] Breakpoint tests very slow
In-Reply-To: <20070208023347.4005.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208023347.4005.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208105306.22684.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-08 10:53 -------
If this is about frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints then a big chunk of the slowdown
comes from the stepping/breakpointing testing. At the moment the
funit-breakpoints contains a workaround to reset the signal handler (see bug
#3997) with that removed they are a lot faster. They also do 7 iterations over
all the different breakpoints. This could be reduced to 3 in case of stepping.
Stepping a program is however slow whatever you do.

What is "slow" and what is "acceptable" in this case?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4005

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 18:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
In-Reply-To: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
References: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208181312.22222.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-08 18:13 -------
Down stream RHEL bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224452

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4010] New: Make both druid TreeViews equal
Message-ID: <20070208200603.4010.mcvet@redhat.com>

So that no information about a process is lost when moving them over to the 
right side for monitoring/debugging.

-- 
           Summary: Make both druid TreeViews equal
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208200605.4657.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4010


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208200754.10915.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4011


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4010] Make both druid TreeViews equal
In-Reply-To: <20070208200603.4010.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070208200603.4010.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208200753.10840.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4011


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4011] New: Add column filtering options for druid tree views
Message-ID: <20070208200749.4011.mcvet@redhat.com>

So that things like VSZ and Location can be filtered out or put in as needed. 
Probably need an "edit columns" dialog box, like in the MemoryWindow.

-- 
           Summary: Add column filtering options for druid tree views
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632,4010
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4011

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4012] New: parser seems to have trouble parsing debuginfo for packages
Message-ID: <20070208201222.4012.mcvet@redhat.com>

Installing a variety of debuginfo packages from RPM and opening up the 
SourceWindow on one of these processes results in plaintext in the view. This 
is because parsing failed for the source of this process and the buffer loaded 
it manually.

-- 
           Summary: parser seems to have trouble parsing debuginfo for
                    packages
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,rmoseley at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4012

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208201223.14268.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4012


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3323] java.lang.Exception from observing python process on FC5
In-Reply-To: <20061009145243.3323.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20061009145243.3323.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208201538.15339.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-08 20:15 -------
Ping on this - Len, does this still happen for you?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3323

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] Memory leakage
In-Reply-To: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208204103.24971.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|mcvet at redhat dot com     |
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |1633, 3346
              nThis|                            |
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 20:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208204900.29242.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3380, which changed state.

Bug 3380 Summary: Frysk - built from CVS head 20061018 - debug an existing process twice = infinite loop exception
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3380

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 22:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2104] [tracker] Fedora Core 5
In-Reply-To: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208222654.28692.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2104 depends on bug 2130, which changed state.

Bug 2130 Summary: Running testTaskExec(frysk.proc.TestExec) ...FAIL on fc5
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2130

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2104

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 22:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1496] [tracker] Linux Kernel problems and requirements
In-Reply-To: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070208222655.28698.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1496 depends on bug 2130, which changed state.

Bug 2130 Summary: Running testTaskExec(frysk.proc.TestExec) ...FAIL on fc5
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2130

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1496

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb  8 22:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070208222751.29588.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-08 22:27 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2130 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 01:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070209010938.17126.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-09 01:09 -------
Reopening after talking to Mark.  We believe this is not actually the same
problem as 2130, but rather a similar case (occuring in a slightly different place).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 01:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3820] kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:201! running make check in frysk-imports
In-Reply-To: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070102095251.3820.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070209012132.20721.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-09 01:21 -------
Opened a bug against the FC6 kernel:

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227952

Suspending this ticket to track progress of the FC bug.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3820

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 16:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3389] [tracker] Documentation
In-Reply-To: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018184118.3389.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209160155.26005.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3389 depends on bug 3949, which changed state.

Bug 3949 Summary: utilities documentation needs cleanup.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3389

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 16:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1593] examine or modify a process, task, or host
In-Reply-To: <20051028211205.1593.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028211205.1593.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209161022.6027.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1593 depends on bug 2663, which changed state.

Bug 2663 Summary: strange getExe() values
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2663

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1593

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 16:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] Event Druid / Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209161141.8120.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 2690, which changed state.

Bug 2690 Summary: Editing observer unless you reselect = null pointer exception
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2690

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 16:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209165101.2234.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4005, which changed state.

Bug 4005 Summary: Breakpoint tests very slow
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4005

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 17:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4004] frysk.expunit.Expect doesn't consume sigchlds
In-Reply-To: <20070208022349.4004.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208022349.4004.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209174452.4575.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4004

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 17:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209174716.5450.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4004, which changed state.

Bug 4004 Summary: frysk.expunit.Expect doesn't consume sigchlds
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4004

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 17:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2244] [tracker] fstack: standalone program for pulling a multi-threaded stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174038.2244.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209174709.5341.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2244 depends on bug 4004, which changed state.

Bug 4004 Summary: frysk.expunit.Expect doesn't consume sigchlds
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4004

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 19:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4019] New: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException
Message-ID: <20070209195446.4019.cagney@redhat.com>

1)
testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.7)
   at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.7)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testHitAndRun(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingtestHitAndRun(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
2)
testSteppingtestInsertRemove(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.7)
   at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.7)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testInsertRemove(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingtestInsertRemove(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
3) testSteppingAddLots(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException
  at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.7)
   at java.lang.Integer.decode(libgcj.so.7)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testAddLots(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingAddLots(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

uname -a
Linux nettle 2.6.18-1.2257.fc5 #1 Fri Dec 15 16:06:24 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux

-- 
           Summary: testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)jav
                    a.lang.NullPointerException
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4019

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4019] testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)java.lang.NullPointerException
In-Reply-To: <20070209195446.4019.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070209195446.4019.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070209213637.30510.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-09 21:36 -------
Kernel bug :{

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3997 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4019

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb  9 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070209213637.30519.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-09 21:36 -------
*** Bug 4019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb 10 00:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070210002204.27505.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-10 00:22 -------
Marking as suspended, test case added.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4019
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 14:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070212143230.21295.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 3228, which changed state.

Bug 3228 Summary: code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 14:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070212143227.21256.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1839 depends on bug 3228, which changed state.

Bug 3228 Summary: code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 16:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3228] code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
In-Reply-To: <20060918184124.3228.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060918184124.3228.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070212163231.1287.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-12 16:32 -------
diff -u -r1.95 Makefile.am
--- frysk-imports/tests/Makefile.am     9 Feb 2007 16:27:30 -0000       1.95
+++ frysk-imports/tests/Makefile.am     12 Feb 2007 16:31:57 -0000
@@ -448,7 +448,9 @@
 audit_test_audit_libs_LDADD = -laudit
 noinst_PROGRAMS += audit/test-audit-libs
 

-XFAIL_TESTS += frysk3228/LoggerParent
+# Failed with gcj 4.1 and earlier versions of 4.2
+#XFAIL_TESTS += frysk3228/LoggerParent
+TESTS += frysk3228/LoggerParent
 frysk3228_LoggerParent_SOURCES = frysk3228/LoggerParent.java
 frysk3228_LoggerParent_LDFLAGS = --main=LoggerParent
 noinst_PROGRAMS += frysk3228/LoggerParent


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mark at klomp dot org       |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 17:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2947] FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh on FC6 (test2) '.gnu.hash' has unsupported type 1879048182
In-Reply-To: <20060721162632.2947.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060721162632.2947.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070212172447.639.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-12 17:24 -------
This test now passes.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2947

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 17:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2785] [tracker] elfutils
In-Reply-To: <20060616141629.2785.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060616141629.2785.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070212172447.641.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2785 depends on bug 2947, which changed state.

Bug 2947 Summary: FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh on FC6 (test2) '.gnu.hash' has unsupported type 1879048182
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2947

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2785

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 12 17:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3244] testExecSyscall(frysk.proc.TestTaskSyscallObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: inSyscall
In-Reply-To: <20060922112952.3244.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20060922112952.3244.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070212172549.2146.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mark at klomp dot org       |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1604] single step a signal delivery
In-Reply-To: <20051029025619.1604.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029025619.1604.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213131941.13982.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:19 -------
Implemented and tested by TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1604

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1605] single step a system call
In-Reply-To: <20051029025812.1605.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029025812.1605.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213132533.15755.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:25 -------
System call tracing is difficult with ptrace singlestep since you won't get
separate events anymore for syscall enter/exit. This could however be simulated
by generializing the Isa.isAtSyscallSigReturn() method to return the syscall the
current pc is on during stepping.

This however depends on syscall enter/exit events (and it particular the syscall
number/name, result and arguments passing) being properly done through the TaskO
bserver.Syscall interface and the associated Task.getSyscallEventInfo() method.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |1524


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1605

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3561] single step the sigreturn system call stops at trapped instruction when that does not have breakpoints
In-Reply-To: <20061122171837.3561.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122171837.3561.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213132828.17305.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:28 -------
There is now a specific test for this.
TestTaskObserverInstructionSigReturn

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3561

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3562] single-step sigreturn when trapped instruction is a breakpoint
In-Reply-To: <20061122172214.3562.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122172214.3562.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213133124.17938.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:31 -------
Most of this is tested by the testStepping* variants in TestBreakpoints,
counters on both Instruction and Code observers are observed. An explicit test
could be added for "doesn't go one instruction too far".

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3562

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3563] single-step when a pending signal
In-Reply-To: <20061122172517.3563.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122172517.3563.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213133514.18950.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:35 -------
There are now a couple of tests that handle signal delivery while stepping and
the TaskState machinery has been expanded to handle it (see
LinuxPtraceTaskState.Running.handleTrapEvent()). Kernel bugs have been found,
sigh (see bug #3997). A test could be added to make sure that we land on the
first instruction of the signal handler.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3563

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3564] single-step when pending signal, and on a breakpoint instruction
In-Reply-To: <20061122172708.3564.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122172708.3564.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213133942.21099.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:39 -------
This is an interesting case. The TaskState mechanism is currently not setup to
preventively remove any breakpoints. Is there any mechanism to definitely know
that a Task has any pending signals? I assume that a signal could become pending
during the next ptrace-step and if so the step ends up in the signal frame.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3564

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 13:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3569] single-stepp a seg-fault instruction
In-Reply-To: <20061122174635.3569.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122174635.3569.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213134156.22743.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-13 13:41 -------
This is now tested by the testStepping* variants in TestBreakpoints.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3569

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 14:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2952] testForking(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachSignaledTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (addFork (Sig_USR1,Sig_USR2))
In-Reply-To: <20060722125703.2952.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060722125703.2952.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213141635.9083.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mark at klomp dot org       |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2952

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 14:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2953] testCloning(frysk.proc.StressAttachDetachSignaledTask)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (addClone (Sig_USR1,Sig_USR2))
In-Reply-To: <20060722125934.2953.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060722125934.2953.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213141709.9255.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mark at klomp dot org       |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2953

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 14:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213143917.20937.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3500, which changed state.

Bug 3500 Summary: Inferior process quits with 'Trace/breakpoint trap'
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3500

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 16:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4034] New: ./frysk-gui/TestRunner ... Aborted (core dumped)
Message-ID: <20070213161617.4034.cagney@redhat.com>

FYI, running frysk-gui's test runner.  Wonder if this the same bug as for
"frysk" dumping core when exiting.

$ ./frysk-gui/TestRunner
Running testGladeLoading(frysk.gui.TestGlade) ...GTK Accessibility Module
initialized
PASS
Running testAddingRemovingActions(frysk.gui.test.TestActionManager) ...PASS
Running testAddingRemovingFilters(frysk.gui.test.TestFilterManager) ...PASS
Running testIconManagerLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestIconManager) ...PASS
Running testIconManagerGetFactory(frysk.gui.test.TestIconManager) ...PASS
Running testIconLookups(frysk.gui.test.TestIconManager) ...PASS
Running testgetLocalHost(frysk.gui.test.TestIconManager) ...PASS
Running testSaveLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestObserverSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testFilterPointSaveLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestObserverSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testActionPointSaveLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestObserverSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testExport(frysk.gui.test.TestObserverSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testPrototypeCopying(frysk.gui.test.TestPrototypeCopying) ...PASS
Running testSaveLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestSessionSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testSaveLoad(frysk.gui.test.TestTagsetSaveLoad) ...PASS
Running testWindowFactorization(frysk.gui.test.TestWindowFactorization) ...PASS

Time: 4.564

OK (15 tests)

Aborted (core dumped)

-- 
           Summary: ./frysk-gui/TestRunner ... Aborted (core dumped)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4034

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 16:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213161618.20955.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4034


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 16:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4034] ./frysk-gui/TestRunner ... Aborted (core dumped)
In-Reply-To: <20070213161617.4034.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070213161617.4034.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213163215.2508.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-13 16:32 -------
Just this also crashes:

./frysk-gui/TestRunner frysk.gui.TestGlade frysk.gui.test.TestWindowFactorization


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4034

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 19:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (ajocksch at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213194736.22507.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3537, which changed state.

Bug 3537 Summary: Up / Down buttons in the SourceWindow stop working
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3537

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 19:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (ajocksch at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4036] New: No stack frames are selected after a step instruction
Message-ID: <20070213195439.4036.ajocksch@redhat.com>

After stepping (or running/stopping) the program being debugged, no frames of
the current stack are selected. As well no stack frame is selected when the
source window initially starts. This prevents the stack up/down buttons from
working properly.

After initial discussions with mcvet, the proposed solution is to automatically
select the innermost (most recent) stack frame each time the stack frame window
is repopulated.

-- 
           Summary: No stack frames are selected after a step instruction
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: ajocksch at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4036

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 19:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (ajocksch at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213195440.26426.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4036


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 13 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3650] lib/elf bindings need note section reading capability
In-Reply-To: <20061204231926.3650.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20061204231926.3650.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070213213555.25815.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-02-13 21:35 -------
2007-02-12  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
	
	* Elf.java (getRawData): New. Return raw elf data.
	* cni/Elf.cxx (elf_get_raw_data): Return raw byte data.
	
	* tests/TestElf.java (testElfCorePrpsNotes): New.Test Prpsinfo notes.
	(testElfCorePrstatusNotes): New. Test Prstatus notes.
	(testElfCorePrAuxvNotes): New. Test Auxv notes.
	
	* cni/ElfPrpsinfo.cxx (getNoteData): New. Parse raw note
	data and find relevant note section.
	* cni/ElfPrAuxv.cxx (getNoteData): Ditto
	* cni/ElfPrstatus.cxx (getNoteData): Ditto
	* cni/ElfData.cxx (elf_data_create_native): New. Create underlying
	native data structures.
	
	* ElfPrstatus.java (ElfPrstatus): New Constructor.
	(getRawCoreRegisters): New.
	(getThreadData): New.
	(getPrCurSig): Rename.
	* ElfPrpsinfo.java (ElfPrpsinfo): New Constructor.
	* ElfPrAuxv.java (ElfPrAuxv): New Constructor.
	(getAuxvBuffer): Return auxv data in raw form.
	* ElfData.java (ElfData): New constructor to take raw byte[] data
	and package into an ElfData class.
	(setBuffer): Take a size argument.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3650

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 13:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] Event Druid / Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214132036.11428.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4038, which changed state.

Bug 4038 Summary: Druid tree selections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4038

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 13:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214132034.11412.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4038, which changed state.

Bug 4038 Summary: Druid tree selections
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4038

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 13:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214132017.11230.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4009, which changed state.

Bug 4009 Summary: Fix up SW toolbar buttons
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4009

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 17:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4042] New: TreeStore and ListStore leak memory
Message-ID: <20070214174521.4042.mcvet@redhat.com>

Upstream bug:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407591

Items stored in each of the above objects do not get marked for collection, 
even after supposedly being freed.

-- 
           Summary: TreeStore and ListStore leak memory
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3915
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4042

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 17:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3915] Memory leakage
In-Reply-To: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124155300.3915.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214174522.26458.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4042


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 18:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4043] New: Frysk crashes when used with an incompletely implemented theme
Message-ID: <20070214183743.4043.skasal@redhat.com>

The following crash was reported for frysk-0.0.1.2006.02.19.rh1-0.EL4.1:
java.lang.Exception: Theme directory scalable/emblems of theme Flat-Blue has no
size field

jfoutly commented:
I've confirmed that this is reproducable - however, it doesn't appear to be
specifically related to the theme that's being used. If there are any theme
elements missing, the same (or similar) errors are thrown.

Could you please try this with a current build?

-- 
           Summary: Frysk crashes when used with an incompletely implemented
                    theme
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: skasal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1838
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4043

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 18:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (skasal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1838] [tracker] GNOME, including Java-GNOME
In-Reply-To: <20051110155502.1838.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155502.1838.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214183744.30383.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4043


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1838

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 19:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2777] [tracker] dogtail
In-Reply-To: <20060615144945.2777.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060615144945.2777.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070214195231.5310.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4044


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2777

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 14 19:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4044] New: Extranous dogtail output to terminal
Message-ID: <20070214195230.4044.swagiaal@redhat.com>

File a bug upstream:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407980

-- 
           Summary: Extranous dogtail output to terminal
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2777
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4044

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 09:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4048] New: fhpd cannot see volatile variables
Message-ID: <20070215094034.4048.mark@klomp.org>

When attaching to the following program you cannot print out i or j. Removing
the volatile attribute makes them visable.

#include <stdio.h>

static volatile int i;
static volatile int j;
int
main (int argc, char *argv)
{
  i = 0;
  printf("hello world\n");
  while(1)
    {
      i++;
      j = i;
      j -= 1;
    }
}

-- 
           Summary: fhpd cannot see volatile variables
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4048

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 09:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4049] New: fhpd should have gdb compatible command aliases
Message-ID: <20070215094439.4049.mark@klomp.org>

A nice feature would be to have compatibility with gdb command set.
Maybe as a set of aliases.

-- 
           Summary: fhpd should have gdb compatible command aliases
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4049

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 09:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4050] New: fhpd help doesn't show expanded help items
Message-ID: <20070215094711.4050.mark@klomp.org>

help in the fhpd only show the summary help, not tab-completion or more detailed
help on any of the commands is available.

-- 
           Summary: fhpd help doesn't show expanded help items
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4050

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 13:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3387] [tracker] 32-bit vs 64-bit problems
In-Reply-To: <20061018175836.3387.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018175836.3387.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215134701.26693.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3387 depends on bug 3721, which changed state.

Bug 3721 Summary: Add ISA <-> Elf map, eliminate switch
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3721

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3387

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 13:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215134701.26709.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 3721, which changed state.

Bug 3721 Summary: Add ISA <-> Elf map, eliminate switch
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3721

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 13:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3387] [tracker] 32-bit vs 64-bit problems
In-Reply-To: <20061018175836.3387.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018175836.3387.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215135044.27415.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3387 depends on bug 3720, which changed state.

Bug 3720 Summary: frysk.proc.MachineType wrong when 32-on-64
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3720

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3387

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4051] New: task won't unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver
Message-ID: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>

If there are any other observers installed e.g., a CodeObserver, the task won't
unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver; requestUnblock must be
called too. See frysk.rt.RunState.run.

-- 
           Summary: task won't unblock after calling
                    requestDeleteInstructionObserver
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: timoore at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4051

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 14:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3562] single-step sigreturn when trapped instruction is a breakpoint
In-Reply-To: <20061122172214.3562.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061122172214.3562.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215142621.15870.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 14:26 -------
Checking is is very important, kernel and code bugs if encountered in the past
have exibited exactly those edge case problems - executing the instruction,
continuing, ...


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3562

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 16:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4042] TreeStore and ListStore leak memory
In-Reply-To: <20070214174521.4042.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070214174521.4042.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215160342.7583.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|swagiaal at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4042

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 16:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4052] New: frysk2130/strace-clone-exec test causes kernel BUG report and process hang
Message-ID: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

FC6 with 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 kernel on x86_64:

BUGging on (tsk->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
Kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:193
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
last sysfs file: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/irq
CPU 1
Modules linked in: i915 drm autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth sunrpc dm_mirror
dm_multipath dm_mod video sbs i2c_ec button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6 lp joydev
snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec snd_ac97_bus snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss
snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss sg snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm
snd_timer snd soundcore pcspkr snd_page_alloc tg3 ide_cd shpchp iTCO_wdt
i2c_i801 serio_raw i2c_core parport_pc cdrom parport ata_piix libata sd_mod
scsi_mod ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd
Pid: 25672, comm: threadexec Not tainted 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 #1
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802bb506>]  [<ffffffff802bb506>] check_dead_utrace+0x6c/0x146
RSP: 0018:ffff8100b3bb7cf8  EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 000000000000002f RBX: ffff810099b45080 RCX: ffffffff80575598
RDX: ffffffff80575598 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff80575580
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff80575598 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff80277353 R12: ffff8100ae8dd440
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff810099b45080 R15: 0000000000000028
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff810037e25bc0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000412460 CR3: 000000009f9c4000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process threadexec (pid: 25672, threadinfo ffff8100b3bb6000, task ffff810099b45080)
Stack:  ffff810099b45080 ffff8100ae8dd450 ffff8100ae8dd440 0000000000000000
 0000000000000000 ffffffff802bb653 ffff8100ce544840 0000000000000010
 ffff8100ae8dd440 ffff810099b45080 ffff810099b451a8 ffff8100b3bb7ef8
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff802bb653>] remove_detached+0x73/0x86
 [<ffffffff80215854>] do_exit+0x817/0x8f7
 [<ffffffff802475d9>] cpuset_exit+0x0/0x6c
 [<ffffffff8022b508>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3b6/0x3e5
 [<ffffffff802596b4>] do_notify_resume+0x9c/0x727
 [<ffffffff8025c346>] int_signal+0x12/0x17
 [<00000034d2007585>]


Code: 0f 0b 68 7e 68 49 80 c2 c1 00 83 bb f4 00 00 00 ff 75 39 b8
RIP  [<ffffffff802bb506>] check_dead_utrace+0x6c/0x146
 RSP <ffff8100b3bb7cf8>
 <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8026999a>] show_trace+0x34/0x47
 [<ffffffff802699bf>] dump_stack+0x12/0x17
 [<ffffffff802b6ced>] softlockup_tick+0xdb/0xf6
 [<ffffffff80293c2f>] update_process_times+0x42/0x68
 [<ffffffff802749d9>] smp_local_timer_interrupt+0x34/0x55
 [<ffffffff8027508d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x51/0x69
 [<ffffffff8025ccf6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
 [<ffffffff80207808>] _raw_spin_lock+0x78/0xe5
 [<ffffffff802bb443>] utrace_release_task+0x43/0x78
 [<ffffffff80217ad2>] release_task+0x1c/0x345
 [<ffffffff8022c197>] flush_old_exec+0x361/0xa22
 [<ffffffff8021838a>] load_elf_binary+0x454/0x17a1
 [<ffffffff8023f340>] search_binary_handler+0xc7/0x2b2
 [<ffffffff8023e86c>] do_execve+0x18c/0x242
 [<ffffffff80252be7>] sys_execve+0x36/0x4c
 [<ffffffff8025c4f7>] stub_execve+0x67/0xb0
 [<ffff810037e25bc0>]
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xffff810037e25bc0

Leftover inexact backtrace:


BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, threadexec/25672, ffff8100ae8dd460 (Not tainted)

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8026999a>] show_trace+0x34/0x47
 [<ffffffff802699bf>] dump_stack+0x12/0x17
 [<ffffffff80207854>] _raw_spin_lock+0xc4/0xe5
 [<ffffffff802bb443>] utrace_release_task+0x43/0x78
 [<ffffffff80217ad2>] release_task+0x1c/0x345
 [<ffffffff8022c197>] flush_old_exec+0x361/0xa22
 [<ffffffff8021838a>] load_elf_binary+0x454/0x17a1
 [<ffffffff8023f340>] search_binary_handler+0xc7/0x2b2
 [<ffffffff8023e86c>] do_execve+0x18c/0x242
 [<ffffffff80252be7>] sys_execve+0x36/0x4c
 [<ffffffff8025c4f7>] stub_execve+0x67/0xb0

The test execution is killable, yet the threadexec process is not.  In fact,
according to top it continuously consumes 100% CPU, requiring a reboot to clear
up the situation.

-- 
           Summary: frysk2130/strace-clone-exec test causes kernel BUG
                    report and process hang
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4052

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 16:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4052] frysk2130/strace-clone-exec test causes kernel BUG report and process hang
In-Reply-To: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070215163724.2081.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-02-15 16:37 -------
New occurrence, this time without a CPU lockup requiring a power cycle on the box:

BUGging on (tsk->exit_state != EXIT_ZOMBIE)
----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
Kernel BUG at kernel/utrace.c:193
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP 
last sysfs file: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/irq
CPU 0 
Modules linked in: i915 drm autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth sunrpc dm_mirror
dm_multipath dm_mod video sbs i2c_ec button battery asus_acpi ac ipv6 lp joydev
sg snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec snd_ac97_bus snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss
snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm
ide_cd cdrom snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 parport_pc i2c_core
tg3 parport pcspkr iTCO_wdt shpchp serio_raw ata_piix libata sd_mod scsi_mod
ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd
Pid: 4830, comm: threadexec Not tainted 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 #1
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802bb506>]  [<ffffffff802bb506>] check_dead_utrace+0x6c/0x146
RSP: 0018:ffff8100b6b53cf8  EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 000000000000002f RBX: ffff8100d8694040 RCX: ffffffff80575598
RDX: ffffffff80575598 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff80575580
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff80575598 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff80277353 R12: ffff8100b6c71500
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8100d8694040 R15: 0000000000000028
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff8064e000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000412460 CR3: 00000000b8b79000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process threadexec (pid: 4830, threadinfo ffff8100b6b52000, task ffff8100d8694040)
Stack:  ffff8100d8694040 ffff8100b6c71510 ffff8100b6c71500 0000000000000000
 0000000000000000 ffffffff802bb653 ffff8100d93d4840 0000000000000010
 ffff8100b6c71500 ffff8100d8694040 ffff8100d8694168 ffff8100b6b53ef8
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff802bb653>] remove_detached+0x73/0x86
 [<ffffffff80215854>] do_exit+0x817/0x8f7
 [<ffffffff802475d9>] cpuset_exit+0x0/0x6c
 [<ffffffff8022b508>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x3b6/0x3e5
 [<ffffffff802596b4>] do_notify_resume+0x9c/0x727
 [<ffffffff8025c708>] retint_signal+0x3d/0x85


Code: 0f 0b 68 7e 68 49 80 c2 c1 00 83 bb f4 00 00 00 ff 75 39 b8 
RIP  [<ffffffff802bb506>] check_dead_utrace+0x6c/0x146
 RSP <ffff8100b6b53cf8>
 <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4052

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 18:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215185805.10795.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4015, which changed state.

Bug 4015 Summary: Source Window needs more fine-grained control of stepping
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4015

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4054] New: [tracker] jline
Message-ID: <20070215190332.4054.cagney@redhat.com>

This is a tracker bug for problems identified with the jline package.

-- 
           Summary: [tracker] jline
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1602
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4054

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1602] [tracker] Upstream code
In-Reply-To: <20051029013918.1602.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029013918.1602.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215190332.13613.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4054


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1602

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4054] [tracker] jline
In-Reply-To: <20070215190332.4054.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070215190332.4054.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215190734.22323.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4055


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4054

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4055] New: jline calls Runtime.getRuntime ().exec(cmd) aka system()
Message-ID: <20070215190733.4055.cagney@redhat.com>

The jline library creates a child process using Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd).
 This use of fork and SIGCHLD clashes with frys's control over the same components.

-- 
           Summary: jline calls Runtime.getRuntime ().exec(cmd) aka system()
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 4054
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4055

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4056] New: dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)
Message-ID: <20070215191211.4056.mark@klomp.org>

make[5]: Entering directory `/home/mark/src/frysk-obj/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw'
if gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DIS_LIBDW -I.
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw -I.. -I.
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/../libelf -I..
-I../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/../lib    -Wall -Werror
-Wshadow -Wunused -Wformat=2 -Wextra -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -MT dwarf_whatform.o -MD
-MP -MF ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo" -c -o dwarf_whatform.o
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/dwarf_whatform.c; \
        then mv -f ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo" ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Po"; else rm
-f ".deps/dwarf_whatform.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/dwarf_whatform.c:61: error:
redefinition of ??dwarf_whatform??
../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/elfutils/libdw/libdw.h:628: error: previous
definition of ??dwarf_whatform?? was here
make[5]: *** [dwarf_whatform.o] Error 1

-- 
           Summary: dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4056

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3548] [tracker] script to run installed dejagnu tests
In-Reply-To: <20061120232623.3548.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061120232623.3548.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215192250.29211.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3548

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215192435.29703.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 3548, which changed state.

Bug 3548 Summary: [tracker] script to run installed dejagnu tests
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3548

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 19:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1601] [tracker] standalone a.k.a. command-line utilities
In-Reply-To: <20051029010334.1601.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029010334.1601.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215192435.29699.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1601 depends on bug 3548, which changed state.

Bug 3548 Summary: [tracker] script to run installed dejagnu tests
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3548

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1601

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4056] dwarf_whatform.c doesn't compile with gcc 4.3 (svn)
In-Reply-To: <20070215191211.4056.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070215191211.4056.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070215201123.26948.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-15 20:11 -------
Just for the record this was with an SVN version of gcc (4.3) which some claim
has broken inline semantics. This hasn't any priority at the moment.

I was only trying this out because I wanted to try the new gcj. But there is a
backport of that available for 4.1 which I will use so as to not be tripped over
any changes in the C and C++ compilers. See
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20070117

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4056

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] New: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock 
Message-ID: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>

Open a random process without debuginfo in the source window.

Then click "continue" to attempt to continue execution of the process.

A core error dialog comes up with:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@398d1b75,pid=11829,tid=11829,state=detached} in 
state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock

java.lang.RuntimeException: 
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@398d1b75,pid=11829,tid=11829,state=detached} in 
state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleUnblock(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task$2.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,s
                    tate=detached} in state "detached" did not handle
                    handleUnblock
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4002] frysk.bindir.testRunCppParser has no installed test program
In-Reply-To: <20070208020640.4002.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208020640.4002.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215202013.29933.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4002

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4001] Internal debugger error: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
In-Reply-To: <20070208020103.4001.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208020103.4001.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215202103.31544.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4001

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
In-Reply-To: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215205405.11596.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 20:54 -------
Looks like this is caused by a combination of:

t.requestDeleteInstructionObserver(this);
t.requestUnblock(this);

in RunState.run(LinkedList).

Blocking by #4051

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4051
            Summary|{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@|{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@
                   |39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,s|39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,s
                   |tate=detached} in state     |tate=detached} in state
                   |"detached" did not handle   |"detached" did not handle
                   |handleUnblock               |handleUnblock


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
In-Reply-To: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215205741.13095.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From timoore at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 20:57 -------
My little test program:

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
  int i = 0;

  while (1)
    {
      if (i > 0)
        i--;
      else
        i++;
    }
  return 0;
}

I use fhpd to attach to this running program:
attach test1 0000
break test1.c 10
go

Without the call to requestUnblock the process won't continue.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4051] task won't unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver
In-Reply-To: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
References: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215205653.12918.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 20:56 -------
#4057 is apparently a result of the combination of 
requestDeleteInstructionObserver() + requestUnblock(instructionObserver).

Can be observed by trying to 'continue' almost any non-debuginfo program in the 
sourcewindow.

When working with step-over and step-out in RunState, I did not notice this 
bug, but the difference is that in that case the InstructionObserver was being 
deleted from CodeObserver.addedTo(), instead of when both were fully blocking 
the Task.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4051

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 20:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4051] task won't unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver
In-Reply-To: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
References: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215205827.13432.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From timoore at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 20:58 -------
My little test program:

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
  int i = 0;

  while (1)
    {
      if (i > 0)
        i--;
      else
        i++;
    }
  return 0;
}

I use fhpd to attach to this running program:
attach test1 0000
break test1.c 10
go

Without the call to requestUnblock the process won't continue.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4051

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4058] New: frysk.rt.TestStackFrame errors
Message-ID: <20070215232835.4058.mcvet@redhat.com>

There were 4 errors:
1) testStripped(frysk.rt.TestStackFrame)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame$2$Terminator.updateSignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.frameTest(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.testStripped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
2) testStaticStripped(frysk.rt.TestStackFrame)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame$2$Terminator.updateSignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.frameTest(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.testStaticStripped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
3) testAsmStrippedNoSize(frysk.rt.TestStackFrame)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame$2$Terminator.updateSignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.frameTest(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.testAsmStrippedNoSize(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
4) 
testStaticAsmStrippedNoSize(frysk.rt.TestStackFrame)java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame$2$Terminator.updateSignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySignaled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSignaledEvent(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.stopped(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.frameTest(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStackFrame.testStaticAsmStrippedNoSize(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 12,  Failures: 0,  Errors: 4

Failed after run #0

-- 
           Summary: frysk.rt.TestStackFrame errors
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4058

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4058] frysk.rt.TestStackFrame errors
In-Reply-To: <20070215232835.4058.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215232835.4058.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215233009.7268.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 23:30 -------
This was after StackFrame.toPrint() was changed to use getSymbolName() rather 
than StackFrame.getMethodName(), thus using elfutils.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4058

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] New: Missing stack frames on i386
Message-ID: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>

Sometimes when stepping into new functions on i386, the frame being stepped /
from/ may dissapear when performing instruction steps.

TestStackBacktrace.testFramePushing and TestStackBacktrace.testFramePopping are 
designed to test this.

These tests do not fail on x86_64 but do appear to fail on x86.

I'll attach a testcase, but the general sitation is that the order of frames 
should be:

main -> foo -> jump

but during the push of 'jump' onto the call stack, the trace may show:

main -> jump

and similarly doing the pop of 'jump' off of the call stack.

-- 
           Summary: Missing stack frames on i386
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: cagney at redhat dot com,mcvet at redhat dot com,npremji
                    at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1839,3076,3346
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [ tracker ] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234544.12978.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4060


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234548.13030.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4060


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3076] [tracker] libunwind
In-Reply-To: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060816142218.3076.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234546.13002.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4060


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3076

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Missing stack frames on i386
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234754.13679.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 23:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=1555)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1555&action=view)
Test program for this bug.

Perform instruction stepping when about to enter jump() and about to exit
jump() to reproduce the bug.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Missing stack frames on i386
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234827.13884.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 23:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1556)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1556&action=view)
Entering jump()


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 15 23:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Missing stack frames on i386
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070215234848.14042.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-15 23:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1557)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1557&action=view)
exiting jump()


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 11:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3228] code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
In-Reply-To: <20060918184124.3228.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060918184124.3228.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216113946.15681.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-16 11:39 -------
Installed patch from comment #11.

       * Makefile.am (frysk3228/LoggerParent): Add to TESTS.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 11:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216113947.15713.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 3228, which changed state.

Bug 3228 Summary: code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 11:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216113946.15690.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1839 depends on bug 3228, which changed state.

Bug 3228 Summary: code logging to frysk.proc doesn't show up
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3228

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 13:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216134345.8827.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 1831, which changed state.

Bug 1831 Summary: online gnome help system
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1831

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 13:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216134346.8851.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 1831, which changed state.

Bug 1831 Summary: online gnome help system
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1831

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 15:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
In-Reply-To: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216151637.18381.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-16 15:16 -------
Temporarily worked around:

Log message:
	frysk-core/frysk/rt:
	2007-02-16  Mike Cvet  <mcvet@redhat.com>
	
	* RunState.java (swContinue): Added. Temporary workaround for
	#4057.
	
	frysk-gui/frysk/gui/srcwin:
	2007-02-16  Mike Cvet  <mcvet@redhat.com>
	
	* SourceWindow.java (doContinue): Temporarily calls
	RunState.swContinue() as a workaround for #4057.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 16:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Missing stack frames on i386
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216160104.7669.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-16 16:01 -------
For what its worth, also reproducable in GDB:

(gdb) bt
#0  jump () at stepper.c:55
#1  0x080483db in foo () at stepper.c:76
#2  0x080483f0 in main () at stepper.c:82
(gdb) stepi
0x08048355 in jump () at stepper.c:55
55      }
(gdb) bt
#0  0x08048355 in jump () at stepper.c:55
#1  0x080483f0 in main () at stepper.c:82
(gdb) 


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 16:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Missing stack frames on i386
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216161008.21078.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-16 16:10 -------
Upstream bug:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12990#c3

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 19:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4058] frysk.rt.TestStackFrame errors
In-Reply-To: <20070215232835.4058.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215232835.4058.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216191307.2157.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-02-16 19:13 -------
Fixed, was problem with getSymbolName method. 
February 16, 2007
	* StackFrame.java (getSymbolName): Fixed to return "" instead of null
	if symbol name is null.
	(toPrint): Changed to just use getSymbolName.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4058

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 19:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3421] testSingleThreadedDetached(frysk.util.TestFStack)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (test)
In-Reply-To: <20061024162121.3421.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061024162121.3421.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216192229.6438.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3421

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 20:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4063] New: StackFrame.getSymbolName() returns incorrect frame names
Message-ID: <20070216201353.4063.mcvet@redhat.com>

I've outlined the strange frame names on funit-child below, versus the return 
from pstack (which matches the results from StackFrame.getMethodName()).


mcvet@warbird:~ >> workspace/build/frysk-core/frysk/bindir/fstack 3257
Task #3257
#0 0x00002aaaaaf106da in __tens ()       <--- what is this?
#1 0x000000000040172d in server () from: ../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/
funit-child.c#249
#2 0x00000000004020f4 in main () from: ../../frysk/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/
funit-child.c#505
#3 0x00002aaaaaefda44 in __nscd_gethostbyname2_r ()   <--- what is this?
#4 0x0000000000401139 in _start ()

mcvet@warbird:~ >> pstack 3257
#0  0x00002aaaaaf106da in sigsuspend () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x000000000040172d in server ()
#2  0x00000000004020f4 in main ()

-- 
           Summary: StackFrame.getSymbolName() returns incorrect frame names
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2935
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4063

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 20:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216201355.29418.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4063


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216202324.32627.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 4062, which changed state.

Bug 4062 Summary: Implement a FrameIdentifier object for StackFrame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4062

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 20:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3925] Multiple runs of testSingleThreadedDetached cause too many open files.
In-Reply-To: <20070125220811.3925.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070125220811.3925.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216204307.5084.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3925

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 21:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4065] New: fstack fails on non-debuginfo processes
Message-ID: <20070216205951.4065.mcvet@redhat.com>

mcvet@warbird:~ >> workspace/build/frysk-core/frysk/bindir/fstack 2730

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.toPrint(fstack)
   at frysk.rt.StackFactory.generateTaskStackTrace(fstack)
   at frysk.util.StacktraceAction.existingTask(fstack)
   at frysk.proc.ProcBlockAction$ProcBlockTaskObserver$1.execute(fstack)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(fstack)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(fstack)
   at fstack.main(fstack)

-- 
           Summary: fstack fails on non-debuginfo processes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4065

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 16 21:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4065] fstack fails on non-debuginfo processes
In-Reply-To: <20070216205951.4065.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070216205951.4065.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070216210702.15117.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-16 21:07 -------
Fixed null frame name assumption in StackFrame.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4065

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 13:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4051] task won't unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver
In-Reply-To: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
References: <20070215135705.4051.timoore@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219132731.28332.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-19 13:27 -------
Mine

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4051

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3792] Provide Bugzilla tracker Bugs with aliases
In-Reply-To: <20061223155342.3792.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20061223155342.3792.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219135245.4536.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-02-19 13:52 -------
Suspended as:
The aliases shown in Depends/Blocks is a Red Hat Bugzilla fork feature.  It is
not present in the recent upstream Bugzilla:
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915 (alias "column")
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7954 not shown here in the list.

There is a need to import the Red Hat Bugzilla feature upstream.
Pointed out by Andrew Cagney.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3792

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 16:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
In-Reply-To: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219161414.31282.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 4057 depends on bug 4051, which changed state.

Bug 4051 Summary: task won't unblock after calling requestDeleteInstructionObserver
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4051

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 16:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4057] {frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@39dffd75,pid=2505,tid=2505,state=detached} in state "detached" did not handle handleUnblock
In-Reply-To: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215201242.4057.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219163310.11578.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-19 16:33 -------
Bug #4051 was fixed and the workarounds have been removed again.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4057

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 18:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219184951.3046.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4077, which changed state.

Bug 4077 Summary: parser puts a double entry for "includes" sometimes
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4077

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 18:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219184952.3054.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4077, which changed state.

Bug 4077 Summary: parser puts a double entry for "includes" sometimes
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4077

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 19 21:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3928] Pty.cxx frysk::sys::Pty::setUpPtyForConsole uses system()  calls to set tty properties
In-Reply-To: <20070126190257.3928.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070126190257.3928.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070219213801.26555.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3928

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 20 01:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4080] New: return exec ("stty " + args + " < /dev/tty").trim ();
Message-ID: <20070220013536.4080.cagney@redhat.com>

The CLI, when run from TestRunner corrupts the user's terminal because of the above.

The question really is: how com /dev/tty is still pointing at the user's
terminal, and not the pty terminal.

-- 
           Summary: return exec ("stty " + args + " < /dev/tty").trim ();
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4080

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 20 22:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4060] Stack frame epilogues broken
In-Reply-To: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070215234543.4060.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070220223313.23530.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-20 22:33 -------
This bug only concerns the epilogues of the frames - the prologue part is moved 
to #4083

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4060

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 14:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3890] attach doesn't need a program argument
In-Reply-To: <20070119225308.3890.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119225308.3890.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221141714.11543.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3890

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 14:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3892] accept: $ fhpd PID; attach to PID
In-Reply-To: <20070119225752.3892.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119225752.3892.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221141818.11798.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3892

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 14:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4010] Make both druid TreeViews equal
In-Reply-To: <20070208200603.4010.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070208200603.4010.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221145927.31397.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 16:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New: New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
Message-ID: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>

The latest gcj does away with its own .java source parser and doesn't provide
jv-scan or something equivalent anymore.

jv-scan is used to select .java source classes that have a public static void
main() method in common/Makefile.gen.sh has_main(). And to generate the classes
list in the CNi header .java.h target in common/Makefile.rules.

-- 
           Summary: New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 1600
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 16:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1600] [tracker] The build and test environments, also portability issues
In-Reply-To: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221165635.15598.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4087


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1600

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 16:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221165857.16026.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 16:58 -------
The search for "main" was originally a grep.  It was changed to jv-scan to make
it more robust (kept finding main in comments and the like).  It can always be
reverted back to grep.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 17:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221170147.17433.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 17:01 -------
the .java.o rule is an optional check that there is no duplicate class (which
gcj has in the past botched).  It can be wrapped in a HAVE_JV_SCAN conditional.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 17:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221171016.27657.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 17:10 -------
The .java.h rule is generating the .h file for all sub-classes of the .java
file.  The sequence:

- get list of classes from .java using jv-scan
- compile to .class .java using gcj
- generate .h file for each class using gcjh

can probably fudge this using a find looking for the classes; or somehow
directly get all .h files generated.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 17:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221174901.12853.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 17:49 -------
This fixes the .java.o problem:

Index: frysk-core/common/ChangeLog
2007-02-21  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * frysk-common.ac (JV_SCAN): Default to "no".
        (HAVE_JV_SCAN): Set using AM_CONDITIONAL.
        * Makefile.rules (.java.o): Wrap use of JV_SCAN in HAVE_JV_SCAN.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 18:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221184059.4925.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 18:40 -------
This removes the use in the Makefile.rules' JUnitTests.java rule:

Index: common/ChangeLog
2007-02-21  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * Makefile.rules ($(GEN_SOURCENAME)/JUnitTests.java): Simplify,
        remove check for a main program in the test file.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 19:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221190113.13632.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-21 19:01 -------
This eliminates jv-scan from Makefile.gen.sh.

Index: common/ChangeLog
2007-02-21  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * Makefile.gen.sh (has_java_main): New function.
        (has_main): Use.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 19:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4087] New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
In-Reply-To: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070221165634.4087.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070221194523.14030.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-02-21 19:45 -------
And this should eliminate the last usage:

2007-02-21  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>

        * frysk-common.ac (AC_CHECK_PROGS): Try gjavah also.
        * Makefile.rules (.java.h): Don't use jv-scan, compile and use
        generated classes found by find and sed.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 19:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1600] [tracker] The build and test environments, also portability issues
In-Reply-To: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221194524.14043.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1600 depends on bug 4087, which changed state.

Bug 4087 Summary: New gcj doesn't provide jv-scan
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4087

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1600

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 21:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221215320.23956.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 3892, which changed state.

Bug 3892 Summary: accept: $ fhpd PID; attach to PID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3892

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 21 21:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070221215739.27390.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 3890, which changed state.

Bug 3890 Summary: attach doesn't need a program argument
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3890

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4011] Add column filtering options for druid tree views
In-Reply-To: <20070208200749.4011.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070208200749.4011.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222152029.8122.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 4011 depends on bug 4010, which changed state.

Bug 4010 Summary: Make both druid TreeViews equal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4011

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222152030.8132.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4010, which changed state.

Bug 4010 Summary: Make both druid TreeViews equal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4010

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3649] Strange backtracing for johntheripper
In-Reply-To: <20061204230814.3649.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061204230814.3649.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222152703.12090.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3649

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3784] should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
In-Reply-To: <20061222153241.3784.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061222153241.3784.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222153809.17970.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222153900.18217.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 3784, which changed state.

Bug 3784 Summary: should dejagnu be replaced by PyUnit?
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4080] return exec ("stty " + args + " < /dev/tty").trim ();
In-Reply-To: <20070220013536.4080.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070220013536.4080.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222155110.26253.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-22 15:51 -------
Index: frysk-imports/frysk/sys/ChangeLog
2007-02-22  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

        * PseudoTerminal.java (RedirectStdio.reopen): Make native.
        * cni/PseudoTerminal.cxx (reopen): Implement; handle controlling
        terminal guff.
        * TestPseudoTerminal.java (testDevTty): Add.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |2234
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4080

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4080] return exec ("stty " + args + " < /dev/tty").trim ();
In-Reply-To: <20070220013536.4080.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070220013536.4080.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222155927.31463.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-22 15:59 -------
Fixes committed, fhpd code correctly sets terminal to stty. (but how it does it
is still wrong).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4080

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 15:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222155928.31466.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4080, which changed state.

Bug 4080 Summary: return exec ("stty " + args + " < /dev/tty").trim ();
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4080

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 16:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4055] hpd calls Runtime.getRuntime ().exec(cmd) aka system()
In-Reply-To: <20070215190733.4055.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070215190733.4055.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222160254.2105.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-22 16:02 -------
The fix here is to create a PtyTerminal that extend jline.Terminal.  That code
then uses frysk.sys.termios to set/clear the terminal settings.

This needs to be common code, perhaphs in frysk-core/frysk.util, so that fhpd,
and the corresponding GUI instance of fhpd can share it.

There is an existing PtyTerminal in frysk.vtecli, that can be eliminated.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|4054                        |
              nThis|                            |
            Summary|jline calls                 |hpd calls Runtime.getRuntime
                   |Runtime.getRuntime          |().exec(cmd) aka system()
                   |().exec(cmd) aka system()   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4055

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 16:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4055] hpd calls Runtime.getRuntime ().exec(cmd) aka system()
In-Reply-To: <20070215190733.4055.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070215190733.4055.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222160613.3793.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|timoore at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4055

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Feb 22 20:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070222202934.19194.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4008, which changed state.

Bug 4008 Summary: non-debuginfo stackframes should be disassembled in the SourceWindow
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4008

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 23 15:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3932] fcatch may not exit on some programs
In-Reply-To: <20070129181037.3932.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070129181037.3932.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070223150851.22297.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3932

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 23 15:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070223150910.22458.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3361 depends on bug 4092, which changed state.

Bug 4092 Summary: Make fcatch work with multithreaded programs.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4092

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 23 15:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070223150904.22345.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3361 depends on bug 3932, which changed state.

Bug 3932 Summary: fcatch may not exit on some programs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3932

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Feb 23 16:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4059] frysk.rt.TestStackBacktrace failures.
In-Reply-To: <20070215233648.4059.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070215233648.4059.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070223164606.21210.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4059

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Feb 24 22:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4097] New: Build failure
Message-ID: <20070224224806.4097.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

../frysk/bootstrap.sh
../frysk/configure
make

gcj -I../../frysk/frysk-imports -I. -Igetopt.jar -Ijunit.jar -Werror -Wall -fPIC
 -ggdb2   -o fryski   libfrysk-imports.so  libfrysk-getopt.so  libfrysk-junit.so
libfrysk-imports.a libfrysk-getopt.a libfrysk-junit.a
./elfutils/libdwfl/libdwfl.a ./elfutils/libdw/libdw.a ./elfutils/libebl/libebl.a
./elfutils/libelf/libelf.a -lstdc++ ./libunwind/src/libunwind-ptrace.a
./libunwind/src/libunwind-x86.a -laudit -lopcodes -L./lib/opcodes -lbfd_get 
./libunwind/src/libunwind-x86.a(Gresume.o): In function `_Ux86_local_resume':
/home/jkratoch/redhat/frysk-build/frysk-imports/libunwind/src/../../../../frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/src/x86/Gresume.c:50:
warning: warning: sigreturn is not implemented and will always fail
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../crt1.o: In function `_start':
(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [fryski] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jkratoch/redhat/frysk-build/frysk-imports'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jkratoch/redhat/frysk-build/frysk-imports'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jkratoch/redhat/frysk-build/frysk-imports'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

-- 
           Summary: Build failure
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4097

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 15:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070226152140.11027.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4094, which changed state.

Bug 4094 Summary: Sourcewindow stack view should highlight current frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4094

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 15:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4100] New: Make check and testrunner failure
Message-ID: <20070226153217.4100.mcvet@redhat.com>

On FC6 x86_64 on a clean checkout:


make[2]: Entering directory `/home/varg/workspace/build/frysk-core'
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
   at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.junit.TestCase.getTimeoutSeconds(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.<init>(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 2.6.17-1.2187.fc5 is not a 
recognized kernel version number
   at frysk.junit.KernelVersion.<init>(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.TestCase.<clinit>(TestRunner)
   at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7rh)
   ...3 more
FAIL: TestRunner
13
PASS: frysk/value/TypeTest
===================
1 of 2 tests failed
===================
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/varg/workspace/build/frysk-core'
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/varg/workspace/build/frysk-core'
make: *** [check] Error 2

-- 
           Summary: Make check and testrunner failure
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4100

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4100] Make check and testrunner failure
In-Reply-To: <20070226153217.4100.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070226153217.4100.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070226153829.20177.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-26 15:38 -------
[root@warbird ipw]# uname -a
Linux warbird 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6 #1 SMP Sat Feb 10 15:16:31 EST 2007 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4100

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 18:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4063] StackFrame.getSymbolName() returns incorrect frame names
In-Reply-To: <20070216201353.4063.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070216201353.4063.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070226180512.19699.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-02-26 18:05 -------
Upstream bug created.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230108

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4063

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 18:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070226185015.16189.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Feb 26 21:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4063] StackFrame.getSymbolName() returns incorrect frame names
In-Reply-To: <20070216201353.4063.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070216201353.4063.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070226212808.7396.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-02-26 21:28 -------
Note that there is now getSymbol{} and Symbol.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |2785
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4063

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 14:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227141430.18359.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3464, which changed state.

Bug 3464 Summary: Disassembly window scrolling problems
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3464

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 15:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227155330.9395.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4093, which changed state.

Bug 4093 Summary: CDT parser gives NPE on simple C++ file
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4093

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 16:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227164703.10074.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 16:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227164709.10106.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 17:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227174322.11983.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 17:43:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227174320.11955.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227182017.6815.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 3915, which changed state.

Bug 3915 Summary: Memory leakage
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227182015.6752.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 3915, which changed state.

Bug 3915 Summary: Memory leakage
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3915

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 20:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4106] New: SourceWindow breakage
Message-ID: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>

open frysk on anything:

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.generateProcStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$31.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: SourceWindow breakage
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4106

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 20:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227204631.28950.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4106


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 20:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4106] SourceWindow breakage
In-Reply-To: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227205043.31003.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-27 20:50 -------
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceBuffer.highlightLine(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceBuffer.setScope(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceBuffer.<init>(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceView.<init>(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.populateStackBrowser(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$31.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4106

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4106] SourceWindow breakage
In-Reply-To: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227205247.351.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-27 20:52 -------
Broken on following assumptions:

Line line = stackFrame.getLines()[0];

Assuming that the StackFrame will have an array of size at least 1 - but a 
StackFrame without debuginfo returns:

if (lines == null)
  lines = new Line[0];



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4106

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 21:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4106] SourceWindow breakage
In-Reply-To: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070227204630.4106.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227210952.13936.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-27 21:09 -------
2007-02-27  Mike Cvet  <mcvet@redhat.com>

	* SourceBuffer.java (highlightLine): Make sure that the StackFrame has 
	available lines before grabbing them. Fixes #4106.
	* SourceWindow.java (generateProcStackTrace): Ditto.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4106

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 21:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227210953.13944.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4106, which changed state.

Bug 4106 Summary: SourceWindow breakage
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4106

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 22:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4107] New: TestRunner is leaking file descriptors
Message-ID: <20070227221300.4107.mcvet@redhat.com>

$ ./TestRunner -r 100 frysk.rt.TestStepping

Running testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping) ...
execvp: Too many open files
ERROR
  java.lang.NullPointerException

When cntl-Z'ing TestRunner during its execution, and taking a look through the 
output of lsof, there are thousands of open files belonging to TestRunner which 
hasn't properly quit after the test failure.

-- 
           Summary: TestRunner is leaking file descriptors
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4107

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 22:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4107] TestRunner is leaking file descriptors
In-Reply-To: <20070227221300.4107.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070227221300.4107.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227222643.5822.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-02-27 22:26 -------
The limit on my FC5/i686 box for the file descriptors for TestRunner is about
1042 and then it aborts.  When I run the command Mike shows I see a couple of
processes running: TestRunner and funit-rt-asmstepper.  Running the "lsof"
command while running those, funit-rt-asmstepper appears to never open any
files.  If I run the "lsof" command on TestRunner I see the file descriptors run
up pretty quickly until the test aborts when it reaches ~1042 fd's.

Now, the weird thing is, when the test aborts, TestRunner remains in the cpu
queue but it now has a *totally* PID.  Doing a "lsof" on that shows about 1042
fd's open.  Looking at /proc/TESTRUNNERPID/fd and doing a list I see lines and
lines of this:

lr-x------ 1 rmoseley rmoseley 64 Feb 27 16:06 110 ->
/home/rmoseley/frysk-cvs3/build/frysk-core/frysk/pkglibdir/funit-rt-asmstepper


It seems nearly all the fd's are pointing to the funit-rt-asmstepper executable.
 Why would the TestRunner be repeatedly opening a fd pointing to the executable?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4107

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 23:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3914] RegisterWindow: ptrace: Input/output error
In-Reply-To: <20070124154310.3914.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070124154310.3914.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227230621.22300.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-02-27 23:06 -------
ping anyone? 

This bug is bad news, because it means none of the Register/Memory/Disassembly 
windows work on x86_64.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3914

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Feb 27 23:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1717] variable changed value
In-Reply-To: <20051030011627.1717.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051030011627.1717.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070227230735.31075.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|mcvet at redhat dot com     |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1717

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 28 12:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4111] New: ftrace crash
Message-ID: <20070228123646.4111.mcvet@redhat.com>

12474.12474 <SYSCALL> read (3,0xbfcf5db0,32)Exception in thread "Thread-1" 
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 24
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32Syscall.syscallByNum(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32$1.getSyscall(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.StracePrinter.handle(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.Ftrace$SyscallObserver.updateSyscallExit(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySyscallExit(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.syscallEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(ftrace)

-- 
           Summary: ftrace crash
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4111

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 28 12:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070228125441.31186.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2245 depends on bug 4112, which changed state.

Bug 4112 Summary: Implement stack tracing systemcalls for ftrace
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4112

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 28 14:04:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:04:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070228140338.32506.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3361 depends on bug 4113, which changed state.

Bug 4113 Summary: fcatch doesn't attach to running pids properly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4113

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Feb 28 14:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4107] TestRunner is leaking file descriptors
In-Reply-To: <20070227221300.4107.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070227221300.4107.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070228141345.12371.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-02-28 14:13 -------
In the previous comment I meant to say "*totally different PID" instead of
"*totally PID".  That is, the TestRunner PID had changed from its original PID
when it was running funit-rt-asmstepper.  But, the new TestRunner inherited the
fd's of the original TestRunner.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4107

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  1 14:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (timoore at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4117] New: state detaching doesn't handle unblock after deleting a breakpoint.
Message-ID: <20070301142640.4117.timoore@redhat.com>

When running the test program below with fhpd:

[moore@localhost frysk-build]$ ./frysk-core/frysk/bindir/fhpd 
(fhpd) attach ~/test/test1.c 8862
runState state = 0
Attached to process 8862
(fhpd) where
#0 0x00000000004006ca in main () from: /home/moore/test/test1.c#42
#1 0x0000003f8501da44 in __libc_start_main ()
#2 0x0000000000400559 in _start ()
(fhpd) break test1.c 44
breakpoint 0
(fhpd) go
runState state = 1
(fhpd) runState state = 0
breakpoint hit file frysk.rt.RunState$PersistentBreakpoint@2e37ae25
delete 0
(fhpd) go
runState state = 1
(fhpd) Exception in thread "Thread-3" java.lang.RuntimeException:
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@2e372435,pid=8862,tid=8862,state=detaching} in state
"detaching" did not handle handleUnblock
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(fhpd)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleUnblock(fhpd)
   at frysk.proc.Task$2.execute(fhpd)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(fhpd)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI$CLIEventLoop.run(fhpd)

#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>

volatile int running = 1;

static void
signal_handler(int sig)
{
  running = 0;
}

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
  int i = 0;

  if (argc > 2)
    {
      pid_t target_pid;
      int signal;
      
      errno = 0;
      target_pid = (pid_t)strtoul(argv[1], (char **)0, 10);
      if (errno)
	{
	  perror("Invalid pid");
	  exit(1);
	}
      signal = (int)strtoul(argv[2], (char **)0, 10);
      if (errno)
	{
	  perror("Invalid signal");
	  exit(1);
	}
      kill(target_pid, signal);
    }
  signal(SIGALRM, &signal_handler);
  while (running)
    {
      if (i >= 0)
	i--;
      else
	i++;
    }
  return 0;
}

-- 
           Summary: state detaching doesn't handle unblock after deleting a
                    breakpoint.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: timoore at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4117

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  1 15:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070301150914.10127.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 4001, which changed state.

Bug 4001 Summary: Internal debugger error: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4001

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  1 15:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070301151321.11903.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 4002, which changed state.

Bug 4002 Summary: frysk.bindir.testRunCppParser has no installed test program
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4002

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar  2 16:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070302155953.29476.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 4118, which changed state.

Bug 4118 Summary: Get DOM pointers out of StackFrame and into Line
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4118

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar  2 16:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070302155956.29491.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4118, which changed state.

Bug 4118 Summary: Get DOM pointers out of StackFrame and into Line
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4118

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar  2 21:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3863] libunwind occasionally does not return frame function names.
In-Reply-To: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070111215705.3863.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070302214957.6520.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-03-02 21:49 -------
Found that it is not (may not) be a Java code problem (not calling dwfl_end()
from its finalizers).
The leakage is present in elfutils even if one calls dwfl_end():
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230793


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3863

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Mar  3 20:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (ajocksch at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2853] Display previous searches as an autocompletion menu
In-Reply-To: <20060627160538.2853.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060627160538.2853.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070303200847.30039.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From ajocksch at redhat dot com  2007-03-03 20:08 -------
I will work on implementing this feature

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|ajocksch at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2853

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar  5 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070305202343.1901.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4129, which changed state.

Bug 4129 Summary: CDTParser adds functions twice to the DOM
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4129

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar  5 20:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070305202342.1889.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4129, which changed state.

Bug 4129 Summary: CDTParser adds functions twice to the DOM
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4129

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 14:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4134] New: build fails with: latex2man: Command not found
Message-ID: <20070306145937.4134.swagiaal@redhat.com>

Frysk build fails with the following error message, and I have to edit the
Makefile to get past this stage:

make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/frysks.bin/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/doc'
latex2man -t
/to/scratch/swagiaal/frysks/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/doc/libunwind.trans
/to/scratch/swagiaal/frysks/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/doc/libunwind-dynamic.tex
libunwind-dynamic.man
make[4]: latex2man: Command not found
make[4]: *** [libunwind-dynamic.man] Error 127
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/frysks.bin/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/doc'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 1

-- 
           Summary: build fails with: latex2man: Command not found
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4134

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306151042.24576.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 3790, which changed state.

Bug 3790 Summary: frysk-core/testsuite/ is not distributed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3790

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3790] frysk-core/testsuite/ is not distributed
In-Reply-To: <20061222212243.3790.skasal@redhat.com>
References: <20061222212243.3790.skasal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306151041.24565.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-06 15:10 -------
frysk-core/testsuite/ has been deleted; replace by frysk.expunit.* a java
implementation of expect.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3790

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 18:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4137] New: testSpeeds(frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: output <<>> contains <<speed 9600>>
Message-ID: <20070306181024.4137.cagney@redhat.com>

Occasionally:

testSpeeds(frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
output <<>> contains <<speed 9600>>
   at frysk.sys.termios.TestLib.verifySttyOutputContains(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed.verifySpeed(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed.testSpeeds(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testSpeeds(frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed)junit.framework.A
                    ssertionFailedError: output <<>> contains <<speed 9600>>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4137

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 18:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4137] testSpeeds(frysk.sys.termios.TestSpeed)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: output <<>> contains <<speed 9600>>
In-Reply-To: <20070306181024.4137.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306181024.4137.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306181142.27580.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4137

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 18:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4138] New: Frys-import lib/elf note reader makes incorrect assumptions about long size/core file architecture
Message-ID: <20070306181738.4138.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

It assumes that the native architecture is the same as the corefile
architecture, leading to testcase fails on reading, for example, x86_64 corefile
on x86 host machines.

-- 
           Summary: Frys-import lib/elf note reader makes incorrect
                    assumptions about long size/core file architecture
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4138

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 18:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4138] Frysk-import lib/elf note reader makes incorrect assumptions about long size/core file architecture
In-Reply-To: <20070306181738.4138.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070306181738.4138.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306181913.32033.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-03-06 18:19 -------
2007-03-06  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>

        * tests/TestElf.java (testElfCorePrpsNotes): Remove
        brokenX8664XXX/brokenPpcXXX test limiters.

2007-03-02  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>

        * ElfPrpsinfo.java (ElfPrpsinfo): Rewrite note data constructor to
        make allowance for runtime architecture over core file
        architecture.
        * cni/ElfPrpsinfo.cxx (getNoteData): Rewrite. Just pass up raw
        byte data without interpretation.

2007-02-14  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>

        * tests/TestElf.java: (testElfCorePrpsNotes): Disable on x86_64 and PPC
for now.
        (testElfCorePrstatusNotes): Ditto.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|pmuldoon at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|Frys-import lib/elf note    |Frysk-import lib/elf note
                   |reader makes incorrect      |reader makes incorrect
                   |assumptions about long      |assumptions about long
                   |size/core file architecture |size/core file architecture


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4138

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 18:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070306185001.10400.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-06 18:50 -------
Note that "upstream" (fedora kernel maintainers in this case) said:

 "Happens on vanilla 2.6.18.6 from kernel.org, too"
 "Does not happen on 2.6.16.35"

So it seems an (old!) upstream, upstream (kernel.org) bug really.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cmoller at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 19:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4141] New: abstract frysk.sys.Ptrace server thread
Message-ID: <20070306193245.4141.cagney@redhat.com>

The server thread in frysk.sys.Ptrace should be generally accessable so that
arbitrary code can be executed in that thread's context.

-- 
           Summary: abstract frysk.sys.Ptrace server thread
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4141

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 19:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306193605.5677.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4142


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 19:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4142] New: ftrace TestRunner, or frysk, shows no ptrace calls
Message-ID: <20070306193605.4142.cagney@redhat.com>

Which must be occuring.

-- 
           Summary: ftrace TestRunner, or frysk, shows no ptrace calls
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4142

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 19:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306194103.7457.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4143


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 19:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4143] New: Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 24
Message-ID: <20070306194103.4143.cagney@redhat.com>

$ ftrace -o /tmp/x frysk
Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 24
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32Syscall.syscallByNum(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32$1.getSyscall(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.StracePrinter.handle(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.Ftrace$SyscallObserver.updateSyscallEnter(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySyscallEnter(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.syscallEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(ftrace)

-- 
           Summary: Exception in thread "Thread-1"
                    java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 24
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4143

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4147] New: Delete "edit" button from Session Manager
Message-ID: <20070306211743.4147.cagney@redhat.com>

The existing 'edit' button is redundant - it is the same as "open".

Going forward there may be a new "edit" button that allows the low-level editing
of the session.  For instance, providing a mechanims to more carefully define
what processes are selected when "open" is clicked.

-- 
           Summary: Delete "edit" button from Session Manager
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3398
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4147

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306211744.27350.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4147


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4148] New: Isn't clear what to do next with the session manager
Message-ID: <20070306212015.4148.cagney@redhat.com>

The session manager needs to be clearer that:
-- the user probably wants to create a new session
-- how to do it
HIG also provides guideline for how to provide an informational message - it
comes with  "!" icon and is left justified.

-- 
           Summary: Isn't clear what to do next with the session manager
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3398
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4148

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3398] [tracker] Session Manager View - a.k.a. start view
In-Reply-To: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174557.3398.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306212017.29045.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4148


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3398

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4148] Isn't clear what to do next with the session manager
In-Reply-To: <20070306212015.4148.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306212015.4148.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306212114.29335.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-06 21:21 -------
If the user is always going to first create a sessioin then, the default for
startup should when first run go straight into the assistant.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4148

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306212440.32146.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4149


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4149] New: Assistant missing [optional] what happens next page
Message-ID: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>

The Session Assistant needs to clearly explain what is going to happen next with
an introductory page.

-> clicking "next" on that page goes to the current first proc-picker page
-> clicking, don't show this again tick-box, stops the page appearing
-> editing preferences lets the box again appear

-- 
           Summary: Assistant missing [optional] what happens next page
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4149

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4149] Assistant missing [optional] what happens next page
In-Reply-To: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306212649.1150.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-06 21:26 -------
It might also be better to, at this point, have the user select if they want to
create a debug or monitoring session (i.e., before they get to the proc-picker).

(that would mean that the screen isn't optional).

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4149

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4150] New: proc-picker LHS and RHS identical
Message-ID: <20070306213109.4150.cagney@redhat.com>

The proc-picker's LHS (available processes) and RHS (selected processes) windows
should be identical.

Right now they are close, but the RHS's colums are starting out with different
sizes.  The consequence is that, in the RHS, fields such as RSS are also visible.

-- 
           Summary: proc-picker LHS and RHS identical
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4150

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306213110.2658.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4150


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306213431.3808.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4151


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4151] New: restrict proc-picker columns to just: name, pid (path?); by default
Message-ID: <20070306213430.4151.cagney@redhat.com>

Displaying additional information can, I guess, be done via a chooser sub-menu?
The alternative would be to have only name/pid visible by default.

-- 
           Summary: restrict proc-picker columns to just: name, pid (path?);
                    by default
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4151

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306213540.4135.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4152


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4152] New: in proc-picker, clicking RHS PID sort sorts LHS
Message-ID: <20070306213540.4152.cagney@redhat.com>

Clicking on the RHS PID column, to sort that side by PID, causes the LHS to be
sorted by pid.

-- 
           Summary: in proc-picker, clicking RHS PID sort sorts LHS
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4152

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306213628.4407.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4153


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4153] New: can't change with of columns in proc picker
Message-ID: <20070306213628.4153.cagney@redhat.com>

I can't figure out how to change the width of columns in the proc-picker (but I
did figure out how to move columns - very nice!)

-- 
           Summary: can't change with of columns in proc picker
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4153

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306213745.4769.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4154


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4154] New: session setup assistant windows should take name of assistant
Message-ID: <20070306213745.4154.cagney@redhat.com>

Once the session has been given a name the window should change its name to that
session.

HIG explains exactly how to name things for this case.

-- 
           Summary: session setup assistant windows should take name of
                    assistant
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4154

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4155] New: assign first process chosen as session name
Message-ID: <20070306214030.4155.cagney@redhat.com>

Now that the session assistant assigns a default name, I don't think there's a
need for the hint saying give it a name.

Instead, should the name adapt to the first process chosen?  For instance, say a
monitoring session is created then, when the first process is chosen, and the
session name hasn't been set then it should change:

Monitoring Session 1 -> Monitor bash

say.

-- 
           Summary: assign first process chosen as session name
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4155

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306214030.5287.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4155


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4156] New: provide default observers for all processes
Message-ID: <20070306214223.4156.cagney@redhat.com>

By defaul (I think I've the list correct), provide the following observers:

-> terminate
-> fork, clone, exec

and for those observers, have a default behavior of:

-> catch stack backtrace
-> do not stop thread

-- 
           Summary: provide default observers for all processes
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4156

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306214224.5669.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4156


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306214740.7715.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4157


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4157] New: debug crashs with infinite null pointer exceptions
Message-ID: <20070306214739.4157.cagney@redhat.com>

Select bash from the list of processes, and then select "debug".  Gives:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.LT(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.errorHandling(FryskGui)
   at
org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.failParseWithErrorHandling(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.translationUnit(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.parse(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.cparser.CDTParser.parse(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.DOMImage.addSource(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.DOMFactory.createDOM(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.generateProcStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$31.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)
java.lang.NullPointerException

-- 
           Summary: debug crashs with infinite null pointer exceptions
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4157

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306215500.9636.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4158


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4158] New: change default to capture information, not print it
Message-ID: <20070306215459.4158.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance, when capturing the stack back-trace, capture the trace, and then
later when the event is selected, display that information.

-- 
           Summary: change default to capture information, not print it
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4158

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4159] New: relace [+] and [-] in add remove filter et.al. with something clearer
Message-ID: <20070306215743.4159.cagney@redhat.com>

The intent of the [+] and [-] buttons in the "filters" and "actions" buttons
isn't clear.  For instance:

- why does the first line have a [-]

suggest looking at alternative ways of handling this, such as a mail-tools
filter rules.

-- 
           Summary: relace [+] and [-] in add remove filter et.al. with
                    something clearer
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4159

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 21:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306215743.11802.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4159


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306220102.13984.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4160


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4160] New: events are called observers
Message-ID: <20070306220101.4160.cagney@redhat.com>

The custom observer window's event menu mentions "observer" when it probably
just means a primative event.  For instance, instead of "Syscall Observer",
provide "System Call".

-- 
           Summary: events are called observers
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4160

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306220238.14377.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4161


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4161] New: provide mechanism for selecting complex observer
Message-ID: <20070306220237.4161.cagney@redhat.com>

The "custom" observer window, perhaps better described as customize observer
window, should allow the automatic loading of new and complex observers (written
in .class).

-- 
           Summary: provide mechanism for selecting complex observer
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4161

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306220520.14968.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4162


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4162] New: combining show-source with resume causes crash
Message-ID: <20070306220519.4162.cagney@redhat.com>

The customize observer menu lets the user specify what to do after the event has
triggered.  Some combinations cause a crash, for instance:

- show source combined with resume

(Instead of show source, should it be 'alert' and then let the user navigate to
the source?)

-- 
           Summary: combining show-source with resume causes crash
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4162

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306220820.23530.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4163


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4163] New: create custom observer double step
Message-ID: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>

To customize an observer a two step process is needed:

-> from observer picker, click on create custom observer
-> from custom observer, click on new or edit or ...

and the the reverse:

-> close customize observer window
-> close (apply? why?) customize list window

Both step's shouldn't be necessary.

-- 
           Summary: create custom observer double step
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3399,3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4163

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306220820.23524.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4163


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306221017.24231.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4164


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4164] New: why does observer picker have "quick debug"
Message-ID: <20070306221017.4164.cagney@redhat.com>

ssia

-- 
           Summary: why does observer picker have "quick debug"
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4164

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306221630.26737.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4165


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070306221630.26730.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4165


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar  6 22:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4165] New: /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
Message-ID: <20070306221629.4165.cagney@redhat.com>

In the process picker, the process name is shown as /bin/bash | bash, but in the
monitor window the same process appears as "mozilla".  Confusing.

PS shows:

$ ps auxw | grep 2504
cagney    2504  0.0  0.1   4396  1104 ?        S    11:35   0:00 /bin/sh
/usr/lib/thunderbird-1.5.0.10/thunderbird

-- 
           Summary: /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632,3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4165

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 13:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4157] debug crashs with infinite null pointer exceptions
In-Reply-To: <20070306214739.4157.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306214739.4157.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070307132001.11927.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-03-07 13:20 -------
I cannot duplicate this problem on my FC5/x86 machine running the latest
software/kernel(2.6.19-1.2288.2.4.fc5) nor can I duplicate it on my FC6/AMD 64
machine running the latest software/kernel(2.6.19-1.2911.6.4.fc6).  *Almost* the
proper thing occurs, the source window remains empty until I click on on a frame
and then the assembly code appears in the window.

This appears to be very similar to but not exactly like bz# 4093
(http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4093) which I fixed last week.  

Make sure the most current cdtparser.jar compiled with the change I committed on
Feb 27 is being used.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|rmoseley at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4157

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 14:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070307145528.28988.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4167, which changed state.

Bug 4167 Summary: Source window startup shows blank window at startup
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4167

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 16:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4052] frysk2130/strace-clone-exec test causes kernel BUG report and process hang
In-Reply-To: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070307162713.2525.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-03-07 16:27 -------
This problem is still occuring on FC6 with the 2.6.19-1.2911.6.5.fc6 kernel.  It
has been confirmed to reoccur on x86.  So far, x86_64 has not shown this problem
again.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4052

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 17:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070307173353.17455.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-07 17:33 -------
Just as a bit of a blog, and as notes to myself, here's what's happening so far:

Presumably (I haven't checked yet, so it's "presumably") as a result of the
ptrace (PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0, SIGTRAP); in the testcase,
kernel/utrace.c:utrace_signal_handler_singlestep() is called.  Something in
there (again, I haven't followed that path yet) results in a call to 

    arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:do_debug()

which calls 

    arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c:send_sigtrap(SIGTRAP,...)

which calls 

    kernel/signal.c:force_sig_info()

which then sets 

    action->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;

if the current action is blocked--the handler up to that point was correctly
pointing at the testcase handler;

A comment in kernel/signal.c reads:

/*
 * Force a signal that the process can't ignore: if necessary
 * we unblock the signal and change any SIG_IGN to SIG_DFL.
 *
 * Note: If we unblock the signal, we always reset it to SIG_DFL,
 * since we do not want to have a signal handler that was blocked
 * be invoked when user space had explicitly blocked it.
 *
 * We don't want to have recursive SIGSEGV's etc, for example.
 */

so I guess the behaviour is deliberate.

It will take me more poking to figure out what, if anything, should be done
about this.  I'm going to guess though that since PTRACE_SINGLESTEP results in
the child looking like it's been stopped by a SIGTRAP, and in the testcase a
non-SIG_DFL handler is being set by the child on SIGTRAP, there's a bit of
confusion.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 18:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3119] [tracker] Memory Window
In-Reply-To: <20060824040915.3119.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20060824040915.3119.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070307185856.5459.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3119 depends on bug 4136, which changed state.

Bug 4136 Summary: Memory/Disassembly windows show decimal ranges instead of hex
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4136

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3119

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 18:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3200] [tracker] Disassembler window + implementation
In-Reply-To: <20060913173535.3200.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20060913173535.3200.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070307185857.5466.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3200 depends on bug 4136, which changed state.

Bug 4136 Summary: Memory/Disassembly windows show decimal ranges instead of hex
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4136

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3200

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar  7 23:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4097] Build failure
In-Reply-To: <20070224224806.4097.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070224224806.4097.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070307235838.32155.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com  2007-03-07 23:58 -------
It now builds but there is needed the mjw's patch from:
http://sourceware.org/ml/frysk/2007-q1/msg00173.html


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4097

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 17:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4172] New: Add option to configure to disable warnings-as-errors behaviour
Message-ID: <20070308171128.4172.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

In order to support being able to test functionality, even in the event of
warnings being generated during the build process, configure should get an
option to disable the warnings-as-errors behaviour in all parts of the build. 
Doing it as a configure option ensures that as the build process changes over
time, this behaviour will remain consistent.

As a first use of this functionality in configure, the autobuild environments
can perform builds with and without the warnings-as-errors setting, providing
testing both on the level of correct code, and on the level of correct
functionality.

-- 
           Summary: Add option to configure to disable warnings-as-errors
                    behaviour
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4172

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 19:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308193015.29832.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1839 depends on bug 2631, which changed state.

Bug 2631 Summary: switch indexed by class crashes compiler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2631

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 19:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2760] Java threads do not understand pthread_barrier_wait
In-Reply-To: <20060613144337.2760.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20060613144337.2760.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308194912.5649.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-08 19:49 -------
Is there an upstream bug report for this?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 20:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3663] [tracker] Variable Watch Tracker
In-Reply-To: <20061205205540.3663.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061205205540.3663.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308204229.2427.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3663 depends on bug 4173, which changed state.

Bug 4173 Summary: Variable watch does not work for multiple threads
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4173

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3663

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 20:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308204229.2409.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4173, which changed state.

Bug 4173 Summary: Variable watch does not work for multiple threads
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4173

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 20:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2760] Java threads do not understand pthread_barrier_wait
In-Reply-To: <20060613144337.2760.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20060613144337.2760.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308205438.7749.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-08 20:54 -------
Some more info from Andrew:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180637
I think it was assumed that that was related so blocked waiting for it to first
be fixed



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2760

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 21:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308211356.25969.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1839 depends on bug 2631, which changed state.

Bug 2631 Summary: switch indexed by class crashes compiler
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2631

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 21:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3663] [tracker] Variable Watch Tracker
In-Reply-To: <20061205205540.3663.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061205205540.3663.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308212245.29937.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3663 depends on bug 4170, which changed state.

Bug 4170 Summary: variable watch tracker loses variables during stepping
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4170

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3663

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 21:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308212245.29901.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4170, which changed state.

Bug 4170 Summary: variable watch tracker loses variables during stepping
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4170

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 21:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] New: Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
Message-ID: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>

Probably more of a stress-test edgecase; but when trying to open frysk on the 
following program from the GUI, it appears to hang for a few seconds, and then 
fail with the following:

java.lang.RuntimeException: destroyed
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$16.handleAddObservation(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.handleAddObservation(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.TaskObservation.handleAdd(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching.allAttached(FryskGui)
   at 
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching$ToOtherTasks.handleTaskAttachCompleted(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$4.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

The test program endlessly creates and destroys threads.

-- 
           Summary: Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: cagney at redhat dot com,mark at klomp dot org,mcvet at
                    redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 22:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308220024.20912.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-08 22:00 -------
Created an attachment (id=1604)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1604&action=view)
Thread test

gcc -O0 -g -o thread_test -lpthread thread_test.c should do it.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 22:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4164] why does observer picker have "quick debug"
In-Reply-To: <20070306221017.4164.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306221017.4164.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308222546.5750.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-08 22:25 -------
I'll fix this

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4164

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 22:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070308222717.6173.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4164, which changed state.

Bug 4164 Summary: why does observer picker have "quick debug"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4164

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar  8 23:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4172] Add option to configure to disable warnings-as-errors behaviour
In-Reply-To: <20070308171128.4172.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070308171128.4172.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070308235240.9763.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-03-08 23:52 -------
Change checked in:

This adds an option to configure that allows --enable-werror and
--disable-werror.  It is enabled by default (backwards compatible).
When --disable-werror is specified as argument to autogen.sh (which
passes it to configure), the -Werror option will *not* be specified
as part of CXXFLAGS, CFLAGS, and GCJFLAGS.  In addition, the hack to
work around the gcj problem (not actually reporting failure in the
event of warnings when -Werror is specified) will be disabled with
--disable-werror is specified.

The implementation of this option has been discussed at great length
on the frysk IRC channel on Mar 8th, 2007.

This commit modifies the earlier move of the "-Wall -Werror" options
from Makefile.rules to frysk-common.ac, by taking out the "-Werror"
option because that one is now under autoconf control.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4172

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar  9 10:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070309104207.23414.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-09 10:42 -------
According to a comment by roland on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227693 this isn't a bug,
but expected behaviour of ptrace single stepping into sig trap handler (so, I
assume it was a bug that this worked on older kernels). Since stepping into a
sig trap handler will produce a sig trap signal itself (because that is how
ptrace reports the single step action) and the kernel cannot rely on there being
a debugger/parent swallowing that second sig trap signal. Note that single
stepping into any other signal handler doesn't have this problem.

So we will have to come up with a trick to (simulate?) single stepping into a
sig trap handler.

Leaving this open for now.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|SUSPENDED                   |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar  9 23:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4052] frysk2130/strace-clone-exec test causes kernel BUG report and process hang
In-Reply-To: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070215161249.4052.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070309230337.9107.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com  2007-03-09 23:03 -------
Confirmed to occur on x86 and x86_64 FC6 with 2.6.19-1.2911.6.5.fc6 kernel.

I am adding code tyo the test script to skip running the test on FC6 kernels
known to cause a problem, because it is causes system hangs, often requiring
power cycling the machine.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4052

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 12 12:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4097] Build failure
In-Reply-To: <20070224224806.4097.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
References: <20070224224806.4097.jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070312123103.6780.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-12 12:31 -------
I added a configure check to see if -Wall is supported. Together with Kris
recent work you should now be able to simple build with ../frysk/autogen.sh
--disable-werror

Next up is waiting for -Wall to be fixed in rawhide and seeing which warning
flags really make sense for our code base.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4097

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 12 14:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4180] New: state "StartMainTask.wantToAttach" did not handle handleRemoval
Message-ID: <20070312143839.4180.mcvet@redhat.com>

testASMStepping(frysk.rt.TestStepping)java.lang.RuntimeException: 
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3b39a0,pid=30653,tid=30653,state=StartMainTask.wantToAttach}
 in state "StartMainTask.wantToAttach" did not handle handleRemoval
   at frysk.proc.State.unhandled(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TaskState.handleRemoval(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Task.performRemoval(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.sendRefresh(TestRunner)
   at 
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProcState$Attaching$ToMainTask.handleTaskAttachCompleted(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.Proc$4.execute(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runPolling(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStepping.testASMStepping(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: state "StartMainTask.wantToAttach" did not handle
                    handleRemoval
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4180

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 12 18:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070312182427.19327.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 2715, which changed state.

Bug 2715 Summary: Frysk debug session Druid appears to trap user in GUI (new session creation)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2715

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 15:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4152] in proc-picker, clicking RHS PID sort sorts LHS
In-Reply-To: <20070306213540.4152.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306213540.4152.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313150551.24632.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-13 15:05 -------
	2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>
	
	* druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java (deFilterPath): Added call to
	ProcWiseTreeview to defilter TreePaths.
	
	2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>
	
	* eventviewer/TimeLine.java: Fixed alignment problems.
	* eventviewer/ProcTimeLine.java: Removed PID from timeline label.
	* eventviewer/ProcBox.java: Fixed bug with main task not being
	the first time line.
	* ProcWiseTreeView.java: Added deFilterPath function.
	Added a TreeModel sort to decople sorting from the underlying
	TreeModel fix for bz# 4152.
	* GuiTask.java: Removed Commented out code.
	Removed get/setParent in favor of using task.getProc().

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4152

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 15:06:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313150552.24643.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4152, which changed state.

Bug 4152 Summary: in proc-picker, clicking RHS PID sort sorts LHS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4152

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 15:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313152550.23653.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4153, which changed state.

Bug 4153 Summary: can't change with of columns in proc picker
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4153

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 15:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4153] can't change with of columns in proc picker
In-Reply-To: <20070306213628.4153.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306213628.4153.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313152549.23631.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-13 15:25 -------
2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

	* ProcWiseTreeView.java (mountDataModel): Set all coluns to be
	resizable. Fix for bz#4153
	


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4153

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 16:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4154] session setup assistant windows should take name of assistant
In-Reply-To: <20070306213745.4154.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306213745.4154.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313160340.30511.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-13 16:03 -------
2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

	* druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java (setEditSessionMode): Dialog title
	now contains the name of the session under concideration. Fix for bz# 4154.
	


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4154

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 16:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313160341.30519.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4154, which changed state.

Bug 4154 Summary: session setup assistant windows should take name of assistant
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4154

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 19:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4155] assign first process chosen as session name
In-Reply-To: <20070306214030.4155.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306214030.4155.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313193705.16641.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-13 19:37 -------
Good idea.

2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

	* druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java (changeGroupState): if a no name is 
	set for the session the name of the first added process is used. Fix for
	bz 4155.

2007-03-13  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

	* ProcWiseDataModel.java (getObject): New function.
	* ProcWiseTreeView.java (mountDataModel): Set all coluns to be
	resizable. Fix for bz#4153
	


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4155

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 13 19:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070313193706.16650.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4155, which changed state.

Bug 4155 Summary: assign first process chosen as session name
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4155

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 17:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314172814.17850.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4165, which changed state.

Bug 4165 Summary: /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4165

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 17:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314172811.17822.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4165, which changed state.

Bug 4165 Summary: /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4165

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 17:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4165] /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
In-Reply-To: <20070306221629.4165.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306221629.4165.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314172809.17808.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-14 17:28 -------
one name was coming from argv[0], and the other from the file name of the file
pointed to by /proc/{pid}/exe. Now both use the exe.

2007-03-14  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java: Initialized initialSessionName.

2007-03-14  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * SessionProcDataModel.java: used guiProc.getExecutablename() instead
        of proc.getCommand() for initializing process name. Fix for bz #4165.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4165

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2642] Debug Session Druid dialogs should be (application) modal
In-Reply-To: <20060505185616.2642.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060505185616.2642.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314182955.19282.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-14 18:29 -------
2007-03-14  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * gladedir/frysk_create_session_druid.glade: Made druid modal Fix for
        bz 2642.
        * druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java: Initialized initialSessionName.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2642

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314182957.19288.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 2642, which changed state.

Bug 2642 Summary: Debug Session Druid dialogs should be (application) modal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2642

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2616] Usability RFE - filter process display
In-Reply-To: <20060428140318.2616.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060428140318.2616.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314183347.20713.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-14 18:33 -------
The assistant process picker is now sortable by all coluns, and supports search,
so it is pretty easy to find a process in the list.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2616

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4185] New: fcatch doesn't work on a command.
Message-ID: <20070314184146.4185.npremji@redhat.com>

/notnfs/npremji/build-frysk3/frysk-core/frysk/bindir/fcatch -- 
./frysk-core/TestRunner -c FINEST frysk.rt.TestFrame
fcatch: no command or PID specified
fcatch: Try 'fcatch -help' for more information

-- 
           Summary: fcatch doesn't work on a command.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3361
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4185

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314184146.25634.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4185


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 18:44:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:44:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4163] create custom observer double step
In-Reply-To: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314184347.26820.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-14 18:43 -------
the intermiedate dialog ("Frysk Custom Observers") allows the user to manage
custom observers (created, edited, delete and duplicate).

That functinality cannot be added to the druid without risking overcomplicating
it or using too much real estate.

One thing that could be done is the rename the "Create Custom Observer" button
to "Manage or Edit Custom Observers" or "Custom Observers ..."

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4163

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 14 19:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4185] fcatch doesn't work on a command.
In-Reply-To: <20070314184146.4185.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070314184146.4185.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070314190113.589.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4185

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4187] New: in p-p selected processes just disappear
Message-ID: <20070315153759.4187.cagney@redhat.com>

>From the process picker, when a selected process (in the LHS) is shifted to the
RHS it just disappears.

Build from this morning.

-- 
           Summary: in p-p selected processes just disappear
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4187

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315153800.29735.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4187


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4189] New: deselecting process-picked processes from old session causes "forward" to disable
Message-ID: <20070315172229.4189.cagney@redhat.com>

-> create a session that selects bash as the process
-> quit frysk
-> from the session-manager, open the "bash" session
-> from the process-picker, de-select several (but not all) bash processes
The forward button de-hi-lights, reselecting some bash processes gets "forward"
to highlight again

-- 
           Summary: deselecting process-picked processes from old session
                    causes "forward" to disable
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4189

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315172230.11326.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4189


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315173751.20383.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4190


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4165] /bin/bash turns out to be thunderbird's shell
In-Reply-To: <20070306221629.4165.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306221629.4165.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315173846.20718.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-15 17:38 -------
Where did the "mozila" name come from?  Having both visible in the
process-picker will help with correct process selection.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4165

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4190] New: full command line missing from process picker
Message-ID: <20070315173751.4190.cagney@redhat.com>

The process picker doesn't display the full command line - like ps-ww does;
makes it difficult to differentiate between one of several processes.

-- 
           Summary: full command line missing from process picker
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4190

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315174231.23512.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4191


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:42:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:42:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4191] New: process picker column preference button
Message-ID: <20070315174231.4191.cagney@redhat.com>

The process picker displays all possible columns.  Need to be able to select the
columns being displayed.

Begs a question, should the preferences be local to the session, or global, or
both; pick one for moment :-)

-- 
           Summary: process picker column preference button
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4191

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4192] New: new process menu entry, creates new child process
Message-ID: <20070315174529.4192.cagney@redhat.com>

>From the monitor menu, it should be possible to create a new process that is
being monitored.

The action would:

- create a terminal tab dedicated to the process
- create the process
- ?allow a default set of observers to be selected (something like the
observer-picker window)

-- 
           Summary: new process menu entry, creates new child process
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4192

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315174530.24850.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4192


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4193] New: add new process menu, to create a new debug process
Message-ID: <20070315174728.4193.cagney@redhat.com>

from the source window, it should be possible to create a new process that is
being controlled by frysk, the action would:

-> create a terminal tab for the process output
-> start the process
-> by default, halt it in "main"

-- 
           Summary: add new process menu, to create a new debug process
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4193

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 17:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315174729.26784.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4193


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315181156.19990.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4194


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4194] New: invoke: frysk --version
Message-ID: <20070315181155.4194.cagney@redhat.com>

invoking:
  frysk --version
should print version information and then exit; same applies to all command line
utilities as this is a generic option.

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk --version
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4194

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315181340.20985.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4195


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4195] New: invoke: frysk <corefile>
Message-ID: <20070315181337.4195.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking:
   frysk <corefile>
should start frysk's source code browser displaying the source corresponding to
the core dump.

This is a generic option, most command line utilities should also handle this
option.

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk <corefile>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4195

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315181611.24099.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4196


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4196] New: invoke: frysk <pid>
Message-ID: <20070315181611.4196.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking frysk as:
   frysk <pid>
should cause frysk??

-> start the source code browser on that process
-> start the monitor on that process; or more exactly, start the setup assistant
with that process pre-selected

I'm going to recommend the second, since the command line utilities all do an
attach/continue and it would be consistent.

Please debate :-)

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk <pid>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4196

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4197] New: invoke: frysk <executable>
Message-ID: <20070315181804.4197.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking frysk with:
   frysk <executable>
should?

-> start the source code browser's <<create new process>> menu with that program
pre-selected
-> start the monitor with the <<create new process>> menu pre-selected

again probably the second?

please debate

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk <executable>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4197

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315182012.25196.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4198


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4198] New: invoke: frysk --debuger
Message-ID: <20070315182010.4198.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking frysk as:
   frysk --debugger
should directly jump to the source code browser.

Is this useful?

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk --debuger
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4198

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315182115.26216.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4199


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4199] New: invoke: frysk --monitor
Message-ID: <20070315182115.4199.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking frysk as:
   frysk --monitor
directly jumps to the monitor, presumably so that the user can then create a
process.

Is this option reasonable?

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk --monitor
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4199

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315182316.27511.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4200


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4200] New: invoke: frysk --debug --terminal
Message-ID: <20070315182314.4200.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking frysk as:
    frysk --debug --terminal
creates a frysk source code window with a very large terminal.  The terminal is
set up to "debug" any commands run from within it.

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk --debug --terminal
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4200

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2248] [tracker] frysk: command line program to start the graphical interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131180412.2248.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315182422.27905.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4201


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4201] New: invoke: frysk --monitor --terminal
Message-ID: <20070315182421.4201.cagney@redhat.com>

Invoking fryks as:
    frysk --monitor --terminal
jumps directly to the monitor with a bash terminal set up, processes started
from that terminal are also monitored.

-- 
           Summary: invoke: frysk --monitor --terminal
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2248
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4201

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4198] invoke: frysk --debuger
In-Reply-To: <20070315182010.4198.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070315182010.4198.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315184659.7496.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-15 18:46 -------
I already had this implemented as a result of #3584, but commented-out in 
Gui.java pending breakpoints progress and core problems; the code has since 
been deleted. 

I'll see if I can get the code back in again.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4198

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4202] New: frysk-imports/frysk/junit/KernelVersion.java parses FC6 kernels versions wrong
Message-ID: <20070315184731.4202.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

FC6 has had kernel versions using version strings like 2.6.19-1.2911.6.5.fc6. 
The KernelVersion class is not capable of parsing those version strings, making
it impossible for e.g. TestCase.java to determine whether the kernel is a FC6
kernel or not (used to determine whether utrace is expected to work correctly or
not).

If there is a definitive standard for kernel version numbering, it ought to be
implemented in KernelVersion.  If not, we may need different logic here to make
determinations about the running kernel.

-- 
           Summary: frysk-imports/frysk/junit/KernelVersion.java parses FC6
                    kernels versions wrong
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4202

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping in the SourceWindow
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315184940.8309.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 18:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315184942.8335.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2234 depends on bug 4103, which changed state.

Bug 4103 Summary: Remove dwfl stuff from StackFrame-related testcases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4103

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 20:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315205919.14028.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 4156, which changed state.

Bug 4156 Summary: provide default observers for all processes
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4156

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 20:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4156] provide default observers for all processes
In-Reply-To: <20070306214223.4156.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306214223.4156.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315205917.14017.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-15 20:59 -------
2007-03-15  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * StackFactory.java (printStackTrace): new function.


2007-03-15  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * sessions/Session.java: Added specific observers to be added to processes
        by default. Fix for bz 4165.
        * sessions/DebugProcess.java: Removed call to logWindow.print().
        * gladedir/procpop.glade: Renamed Main Log to Summary
        * druid/CreateFryskSessionDruid.java (.buttonEvent): Added call to hide
        terminal.
        * TestGlade.java: Renamed logWindow to summaryWindow.


2007-03-15  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * observers/TaskExecObserver.java (runActions): Changed runActions argumet
        to match the new abstract function.
        * observers/TaskTerminatingObserver.java: Ditto.
        * observers/TaskSyscallObserver.java: Ditto.
        * observers/TaskCloneObserver.java: Ditto.
        * observers/TaskSignaledObserver.java: Ditto.
        * observers/TaskForkedObserver.java: Ditto.
        * observers/ObserverRoot.java: Removed call to logWindow.print().
        * observers/ObserverManager.java (initTaskObservers): Initialized
        certain observers to have a CaptureStackTrace action by default. Fix
        for bz# 4156.
        * eventviewer/Event.java: Added StackFrame, setter and getter.
        * actions/TaskAction.java (execute): Changed abstract function to now 
        require an ObserverRoot, and an Event.
        * WindowManager.java: Renamed logWindow to summaryWindow.
        * ProgramObserver.java (.execute): Changed arguments to match new 
        abstract function.
        * actions/PrintProc.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/PrintTask.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/PrintTaskBacktrace.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/AddTaskObserverAction.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/RunExternal.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/ShowRegWin.java (execute): Ditto.
        * actions/ShowMemWin.java (execute): Ditto.
        * observers/ExitNotificationObserver.java (.execute): Ditto.
        * GuiObject.java: Added summary string setter and getter.
        * actions/CaptureStackFrameAction.java: New file.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4156

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 15 21:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070315210301.18006.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3361 depends on bug 4185, which changed state.

Bug 4185 Summary: fcatch doesn't work on a command.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4185

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 13:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316132102.5337.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4204


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 13:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4204] New: Processes in the RHS of the druid process picker don't get opened in the Source Window
Message-ID: <20070316132101.4204.mcvet@redhat.com>

And instead a group of processes have to be *highlighted* in the LHS in order 
to be opened.

-- 
           Summary: Processes in the RHS of the druid process picker don't
                    get opened in the Source Window
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3401
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4204

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 15:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316150943.10323.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4206


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4206] New: browse source code to set file#line breakpoint on random file
Message-ID: <20070316150943.4206.cagney@redhat.com>

The user would like to be able to browse some random source code setting a
breakpoint on an arbitrary file#line.  Then when ever, and if ever, that line is
referenced by any "debugged" program a breakpoint is inserted.

This relies on the breakpoint code monitoring solib events, and when ever it
sees a new solib load or a new executable start, it adds the breakpoint (if
possible).

-- 
           Summary: browse source code to set file#line breakpoint on random
                    file
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4206

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316152650.23898.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4205, which changed state.

Bug 4205 Summary: Create source windows from old stack traces
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4205

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316152651.23916.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4205, which changed state.

Bug 4205 Summary: Create source windows from old stack traces
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4205

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 16:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4163] create custom observer double step
In-Reply-To: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316163619.7206.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-16 16:36 -------
Yes, concept of "create a custom observer" has morphed into "customize
observer".  For instance, for syscall-observer, customizing it to just record
specific system calls.

This in turn, though, leads to further questions:

-> what happens if I click on "Syscall Observer" and then click "customize"; is
it customizing just the local systemcall observer, or globally.

I'm guessing that a customization would apply locally.

Perhaps edit, copy buttons are the way to go?
Perhaps the interface could better suggest that the observers are being added to
a local copy of the pool; for instance (but don't follow :-) the proc-picker
makes it clear which processes are of interest by copying them into a separate
window


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4163

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 17:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4207] New: backtarce when source window is brought up
Message-ID: <20070316173310.4207.rmoseley@redhat.com>

When I try to bring up the source window on my x86/FC5 machine running
2.6.20-1.2300.fc5 I get the following:

Call stack is broken - couldn't unwind!
ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(Errno.cxx:157)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(Ptrace.java:266)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.peekRegisters(Ptrace.cxx:227)
   at frysk.sys.RegisterSetBuffer.refresh(RegisterSetBuffer.java:91)
   at frysk.sys.RegisterSetBuffer.peek(RegisterSetBuffer.java:109)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.peekFully(ByteBuffer.java:93)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.get(ByteBuffer.java:334)
   at frysk.proc.Register.get(Register.java:112)
   at frysk.rt.StackCallbacks.accessReg(StackCallbacks.java:109)
   at lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.unwind_setup(StackTraceCreator.cxx:229)
   at lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.createStackTrace(StackTraceCreator.java:71)
   at frysk.rt.StackFactory.createStackFrame(StackFactory.java:76)
   at frysk.rt.StackFactory.createStackFrame(StackFactory.java:119)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.ExprSymTab.<init>(ExprSymTab.java:127)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.<init>(SymTab.java:107)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.<init>(SourceWindow.java:306)
   at
frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindowFactory.createSourceWindow(SourceWindowFactory.java:121)
   at
frysk.gui.druid.CreateFryskSessionDruid$10.buttonEvent(CreateFryskSessionDruid.java:885)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.fireButtonEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.handleClick(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(Gui.java:244)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui.java:59)

-- 
           Summary: backtarce when source window is brought up
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: rmoseley at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4207

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 17:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316173310.6241.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4207


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 17:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4207] backtrace when source window is brought up
In-Reply-To: <20070316173310.4207.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070316173310.4207.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316173344.6695.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-03-16 17:33 -------
redo summary to correct spelling

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|backtarce when source window|backtrace when source window
                   |is brought up               |is brought up


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4207

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 18:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4207] backtrace when source window is brought up
In-Reply-To: <20070316173310.4207.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070316173310.4207.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316183016.3461.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-16 18:30 -------
This is because the new symTab variable in the source window is being 
initialized before the process is blocked - I'll fix this one

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4207

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 18:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316183604.4517.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4207, which changed state.

Bug 4207 Summary: backtrace when source window is brought up
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4207

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 20:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4163] create custom observer double step
In-Reply-To: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316204639.20151.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-16 20:46 -------
Some suggestions as a result of discussion between me and Andrew:

Gobalizing Observers over the entire session. This means having a global list of
observers which watch all procs/threads in the current session, and allowing the
user to choose which ones are on/off. Changes would then be a customization of
the observers. This means eleminating the metaphore that observers are added to
procs/threads of course. It also has some performace implications. Anyways its a
good topic for the next meeting.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4163

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 22:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3894] assign<tab> doesn't append a space
In-Reply-To: <20070119230546.3894.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119230546.3894.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316223441.25993.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3894

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 22:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3895] help doesn't mention where, up, down et.al.
In-Reply-To: <20070119230905.3895.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119230905.3895.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070316223552.26373.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3895

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 22:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4048] fhpd cannot see volatile variables
In-Reply-To: <20070215094034.4048.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070215094034.4048.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070316223942.30387.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4048

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 16 22:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4050] fhpd help doesn't show expanded help items
In-Reply-To: <20070215094711.4050.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070215094711.4050.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070316224042.31016.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4050

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 12:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3997] SIGTRAP handler gets reset when single stepping
In-Reply-To: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070207161918.3997.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070319120014.21483.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-19 12:00 -------
This is a misfeature of ptrace single step. It uses SIGTRAP to signal that a
step is made. this used to work in older kernels. But newer kernels decided to
block the sig trap handler if the child wasn't using a reentrant sigtrap handler
(even though the ptracing debugger would of course swallow the signal and never
deliver it to the child itself). Resetting the child signal handler obviously
breaks out testcases. For now, to have minimal testing of sigtrap handler
stepping, we instrument the test programs to us SA_NODEFER. Also the
funit-breakpoints uses a simple SIGUSER handler to test signal stepping and
breakpointing.

The real solution for this problem, so we can single step also non-altered user
programs that use SIGTRAP, is to use a, non-existing yet, interface on top of
utrace that doesn't use SIGTRAP for reporting events to frysk.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 13:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319131137.8957.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 3894, which changed state.

Bug 3894 Summary: assign<tab> doesn't append a space
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3894

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 13:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319131514.11094.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 3895, which changed state.

Bug 3895 Summary: help doesn't mention where, up, down et.al.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3895

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 13:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2619] Can't add an observer to init (PID = 1)
In-Reply-To: <20060428141725.2619.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060428141725.2619.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319131724.12022.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|scox at redhat dot com      |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2619

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 13:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1586] track a process doing an exec
In-Reply-To: <20051028190437.1586.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028190437.1586.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319131859.13101.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|scox at redhat dot com      |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1586

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:05:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:05:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1586] track a process doing an exec
In-Reply-To: <20051028190437.1586.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028190437.1586.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319140510.4516.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1586

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319143147.28239.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4212


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4212] New: funit doesn't report bad method names until during test run
Message-ID: <20070319143146.4212.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance:

cagney@toidi$ /usr/lib/frysk/funit
'testHitAndRunXXX(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)'
'testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)'
Couldn't find method with name: testHitAndRunXXX
Running testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...ERROR
  java.lang.NullPointerException

it should have errored before even starting the test run.

There is the code:

                        //Check if the method exists.
                        klass.getMethod(testName, null);
                        
but the lack of any check on status suggests it isn't doing much

-- 
           Summary: funit doesn't report bad method names until during test
                    run
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4212

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4213] New: opening multiple bash shells for debugging gets NPE
Message-ID: <20070319145805.4213.cagney@redhat.com>

Using the process picker, select two bash shells for debugging.  The following
is seen:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.LT(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.errorHandling(FryskGui)
   at
org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.failParseWithErrorHandling(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.translationUnit(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.parse(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.cparser.CDTParser.parse(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.DOMImage.addSource(FryskGui)
   at frysk.dom.DOMFactory.createDOM(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.generateProcStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$31.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.LT(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.errorHandling(FryskGui)
   at
org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.failParseWithErrorHandling(FryskGui)
   at org.eclipse.cdt.internal.core.parser.Parser.translationUnit(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: opening multiple bash shells for debugging gets NPE
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633,3392
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4213

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319145806.4717.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4213


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 14:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319145806.4725.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4213


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 15:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319150052.6449.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4214


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 15:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4214] New: selecting two processes gets two source windows
Message-ID: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>

In the process picker, selecting two bash processes and then clicking on
quick-debug, leads to two source code windows.

Instead, the two processess should be accessable from the single source code window.

-- 
           Summary: selecting two processes gets two source windows
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1633
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 15:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4212] funit doesn't report bad method names until during test run
In-Reply-To: <20070319143146.4212.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070319143146.4212.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319153657.1259.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-19 15:36 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> For instance:
> 
> cagney@toidi$ /usr/lib/frysk/funit
> 'testHitAndRunXXX(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)'
> 'testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints)'
> Couldn't find method with name: testHitAndRunXXX

testHitAndRun shouldn't be XXX disabled. Or was this just an example?

> Running testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...ERROR
>   java.lang.NullPointerException

This should now be fixed in CVS. But I assume this is also not really related to
the core issue of this bug report.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4212

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 16:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4215] New: fhpd does not do hex subtraction.
Message-ID: <20070319163745.4215.npremji@redhat.com>

]$ fhpd 
(fhpd) print
(fhpd) print 0xbfd9b440 - 0xbfd9b3d4
java.lang.NumberFormatException: number overflow (pos=7) : bfd9b440
   at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.expr.CppTreeParser.expr(fhpd)
   at frysk.expr.CppTreeParser.expr(fhpd)
   at frysk.expr.CppTreeParser.expr(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.print(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI$PrintHandler.handle(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI.execCommand(fhpd)
   at fhpd.main(fhpd)
Internal debugger error:  number overflow (pos=7) : bfd9b440

-- 
           Summary: fhpd does not do hex subtraction.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4215

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 16:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319163746.11650.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4215


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2739] Processes display > 500 duplicate threads in Frysk GUI
In-Reply-To: <20060609134010.2739.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060609134010.2739.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319194544.25642.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-19 19:45 -------
Cannot reproduce.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2739

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3401] [tracker] New Session Assistant
In-Reply-To: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019182846.3401.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319195006.27643.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3401 depends on bug 2882, which changed state.

Bug 2882 Summary: Editing a session to remove reference to non-running process = Exception
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2882

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3401

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319195025.27736.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4216


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319195023.27705.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4216


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2882] Editing a session to remove reference to non-running process = Exception
In-Reply-To: <20060705174854.2882.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060705174854.2882.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319195002.27620.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-19 19:50 -------
Now the process list would come up empty in current Frysk there would be no
gedit to remove.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2882

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4216] New: Remove DWARF info from the DOM/parser, and have it provided by RT
Message-ID: <20070319195020.4216.mcvet@redhat.com>

Rather than the DOM going and dealing with dwarf and elfutils itself, it should 
get all the necessary information from RT, such as information for include 
paths and compilation directories.

-- 
           Summary: Remove DWARF info from the DOM/parser, and have it
                    provided by RT
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: cagney at redhat dot com,mcvet at redhat dot
                    com,rmoseley at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2935,3392
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4216

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 19:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2899] Frysk build from CVS head 20060710 - displays very few processes
In-Reply-To: <20060710203351.2899.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
References: <20060710203351.2899.ldimaggi@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319195340.29511.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-19 19:53 -------
What is the expected behaviour ?

Was frysk running on a remote machine. When running on a remote machine over ssh
forexample the number of own process is only a handfull.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2899

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 19 20:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4149] Assistant missing [optional] what happens next page
In-Reply-To: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070319203700.28446.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-19 20:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=1629)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1629&action=view)
screen shot of a possible assistant page

would something like the attached screenshot help ? with some nice icons maybe
?
This would be page 2 in the assistant.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4149

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1496] [tracker] Linux Kernel problems and requirements
In-Reply-To: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051018184956.1496.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320135712.26441.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4217


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1496

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4217] New: utrace: PTRACE_ATTACH of SIGSTOPped process hangs
Message-ID: <20070320135711.4217.cagney@redhat.com>

Opened by Jan Kratochvil (jan.kratochvil@redhat.com)  	 on 2007-03-18 13:33
EST  	[reply]  	   Private

Description of problem:
utrace implementation of ptrace(2) is incompatible:
PTRACE_ATTACH on a process being stopped (by SIGSTOP) never returns.
On non-utrace kernels it returns, tested:
  kernel-2.6.20-1.2300.fc5.x86_64
  linux-2.6.17.7.x86_64 (from kernel.org)
  linux-2.6.16-xen.i686 (from kernel.org)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-xen-2.6.19-1.2898.2.3.fc7.i686
kernel-2.6.20-1.2925.fc6.i586

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Process A should be: kill -STOP process_A_PID
2. Process B should: ptrace (PTRACE_ATTACH, process_A_PID, NULL, NULL);
3. Process B should: waitpid (process_A_PID, &status, 0);

Red Hat bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232837

-- 
           Summary: utrace: PTRACE_ATTACH of SIGSTOPped process hangs
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1496
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4217

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 14:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320141322.9083.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3399 depends on bug 4158, which changed state.

Bug 4158 Summary: change default to capture information, not print it
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4158

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 14:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4158] change default to capture information, not print it
In-Reply-To: <20070306215459.4158.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306215459.4158.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320141321.9074.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 14:13 -------
Fixed in cvs-HEAD

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4158

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 14:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4219] New: ISAs need to be instantiated in a way not dependent on architecture
Message-ID: <20070320144958.4219.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

There may not be an executable, or there may be a remote target. ISAFactory
needs a method to return an ISA that user (the program requests)

-- 
           Summary: ISAs need to be instantiated in a way not dependent on
                    architecture
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1595
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4219

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 14:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1595] [tracker] core file support
In-Reply-To: <20051028213903.1595.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051028213903.1595.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320144959.32499.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4219


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1595

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 14:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4219] ISAs need to be instantiated in a way not dependent on architecture
In-Reply-To: <20070320144958.4219.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070320144958.4219.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320145226.2170.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|pmuldoon at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4219

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 15:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4159] relace [+] and [-] in add remove filter et.al. with something clearer
In-Reply-To: <20070306215743.4159.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306215743.4159.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320152702.27338.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 15:27 -------
The first line has a [-] because clicking that button while it will not remove
the row it will remove the filter it represents from the observer. It will also
clear the selection boxes and the arguments Entry.

This patch also changes it so that the button is grayed out once it has removed
the filters, and cleared the feilds.

This is exactly what is done in Thunderbuird to edit filters.

2007-03-20  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

	* ObserverItemRow.java : [-] Button now disables itself when there is only
	one row is left and the represented filter has been removed from the
	underlying Observer. Fix for bz 4159.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4159

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 17:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4193] add new process menu, to create a new debug process
In-Reply-To: <20070315174728.4193.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070315174728.4193.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320171729.32490.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|rmoseley at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4193

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 17:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4192] new process menu entry, creates new child process
In-Reply-To: <20070315174529.4192.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070315174529.4192.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320171755.990.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|rmoseley at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4192

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320183545.25528.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4157, which changed state.

Bug 4157 Summary: debug crashs with infinite null pointer exceptions
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4157

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320183736.26015.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4120, which changed state.

Bug 4120 Summary: CDTParser should use DOMCompilerSuffuxes to determine c/c++ type files
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4120

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320184458.27807.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4213, which changed state.

Bug 4213 Summary: opening multiple bash shells for debugging gets NPE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4213

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4213] opening multiple bash shells for debugging gets NPE
In-Reply-To: <20070319145805.4213.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070319145805.4213.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320184456.27789.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 18:44 -------
This seems to be fixed with the same change that fixed bz #4157.  Fixed in CVS head.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4213

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320184457.27800.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4213, which changed state.

Bug 4213 Summary: opening multiple bash shells for debugging gets NPE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4213

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320184555.28695.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4220, which changed state.

Bug 4220 Summary: Fix relative vs absolute source file path resolution
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4220

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 18:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320184556.28703.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4220, which changed state.

Bug 4220 Summary: Fix relative vs absolute source file path resolution
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4220

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4222] New: Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
Message-ID: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>

Run Frysk Monitor on any program, cause the program to fork, or clone, then
double click on one of the events which has a stack trace symbole next to it.

Here is the error from trying to do this with nautilius:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at lib.dw.DwarfDie.getDecl(FryskGui)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.setSubprogram(FryskGui)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.setFrames(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.generateProcStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$31.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)

and here is the stack trace I was trying to view:

cloning 3992: thread called clone and created
{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@2915230,pid=3161,tid=3992,state=StartClonedTask.blockedOffspring}
#0 0x0055e258 in clone ()
#1 0x00b37aaa in [unknown]
#2 0x006cf192 in g_thread_create_full ()
#3 0x006d09b6 in [unknown]
#4 0x006d0b4b in g_thread_pool_push ()
#5 0x07a42384 in [unknown]
#6 0x07a43639 in [unknown]
#7 0x07a360d0 in gnome_vfs_async_get_file_info ()
#8 0x080e2786 in nautilus_directory_async_state_changed ()
#9 0x080f6b3f in [unknown]
#10 0x080f6ba6 in [unknown]
#11 0x08094015 in [unknown]
#12 0x08096c04 in [unknown]
#13 0x0809a083 in [unknown]
#14 0x08068b7a in [unknown]
#15 0x08096954 in [unknown]
#16 0x08129cee in [unknown]
#17 0x080a6e6a in [unknown]
#18 0x080a9e06 in [unknown]
#19 0x080f6835 in [unknown]
#20 0x080e1ad7 in [unknown]
#21 0x080e3cda in [unknown]

-- 
           Summary: Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to
                    view a stack trace
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,rmoseley at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320191318.16228.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3399 depends on bug 2866, which changed state.

Bug 2866 Summary: Unable to edit 'Exit Notification' observer - via Custom Observer dialog - exception raised
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2866

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:15:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:15:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320191542.17040.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3399 depends on bug 2943, which changed state.

Bug 2943 Summary: Click Duplicate twice on one observer causes stacktrace
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2943

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4222] Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320191848.18123.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 19:18 -------
sami> there is more
<sami> java.lang.NullPointerException
<sami>    at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.attachEvents(FryskGui)
<sami>    at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.finishSourceWin(FryskGui)
<sami>    at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.<init>(FryskGui)
<sami>    at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindowFactory.createSourceWindow(FryskGui)
<sami>    at 
frysk.gui.monitor.eventviewer.TimeLine$TimeLineDrawingArea.mouseEvent(FryskGui)
<sami>    at org.gnu.gtk.Widget.fireMouseEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
<sami>    at org.gnu.gtk.Widget.handleButtonPressed(libgtkjava-2.8.so)

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4223] New: Source window slowness
Message-ID: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>

While fixing bz #4157 I downloaded the gnome-utils package so I could use the
"gcalctool" to use as an example of an rpm package that was downloaded, built
and then try to debug it.  In the process of debugging I noticed some slowness
in the loading of source files when stack frames are clicked on.  Especially
stack frame #7(gtk.c line #492).  (BTW, I was using gnome-utils-2.14.0-3.src.rpm
for the test so this could change with other versions.)

When clicking on the gtk.c stack frame it takes over 20 seconds on my i686/2GHz
P4 machine to bring up that window.  The source file for that has 3432 lines of
code in the current incarnation of that file.  I'm not sure right now where the
time is being spent.

-- 
           Summary: Source window slowness
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: rmoseley at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4222] Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320192047.18766.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 19:20 -------
This is a special case because the use StackFrame stack trace is a saved stack 
trace from a previous event, and then process is currently running during the 
attempted raising of the SourceWindow.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |1633, 2935
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 19:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4223] Source window slowness
In-Reply-To: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320192420.20361.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 19:24 -------
Added blockers.  It could be parser-related, but that would only cause it to be
slow the first time.  SOme investigation needs to occur.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |1633, 3392
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 20:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3399] [tracker] Custom Observer Editor
In-Reply-To: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061019174818.3399.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320200945.15184.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3399 depends on bug 3067, which changed state.

Bug 3067 Summary: Apply and OK on custom observer menu are indistinct in thier usage
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3067

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3399

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (rmoseley at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4223] Source window slowness
In-Reply-To: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320202326.21969.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From rmoseley at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 20:23 -------
It appears the problem is NOT the parser being called too many times.  Debug
statements show that the parser is being called at the right times.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|3392                        |
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 21:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4226] New: new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
Message-ID: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 21:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4226] new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
In-Reply-To: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320214825.4073.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 21:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=1637)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1637&action=view)
libunwind 20070224 straced.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 21:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4226] new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
In-Reply-To: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320215050.6250.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 21:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=1638)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1638&action=view)
libunwind 0.98.5 straced.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 22:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4226] new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
In-Reply-To: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320224906.4428.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 22:49 -------
It seems as though this bug has to do with caching. The logs show that reads are
done when no ptrace-continue has occurred and the maps should still be valid.

<cagney> ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, 24688, 4*EIP, [0x56c402]) = 0
<cagney> open("/proc/24688/maps", O_RDONLY)      = 3
<cagney> mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0xb7f15000
<cagney> read(3, "0056c000-0056d000 r-xp 0056c000 "..., 4096) = 4060
<cagney> read(3, "b7fb6000-b7fb7000 -w-p b7fb6000 "..., 4096) = 1574
<cagney> read(3, "", 4096)                       = 0
<cagney> close(3)                                = 0
<cagney> munmap(0xb7f15000, 4096)                = 0
<cagney> rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, ~[RTMIN RT_1], [], 8) = 0
<cagney> open("/proc/24688/maps", O_RDONLY)      = 3
<cagney> mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0xb7f15000
<cagney> read(3, "0056c000-0056d000 r-xp 0056c000 "..., 4096) = 4060
<cagney> read(3, "b0aec000-b0aed000 -w-p b0aec000 "..., 4096) = 4059

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |3076
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 20 23:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4226] new libunwind bindings test-ptrace-mapper very slow.
In-Reply-To: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070320213837.4226.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070320230340.6830.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-20 23:03 -------
upstream bug:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19365

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135254.13941.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4227


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135320.14261.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4228


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4228] New: print a bitfield
Message-ID: <20070321135319.4228.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: print a bitfield
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4228

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4227] New: print an enum
Message-ID: <20070321135253.4227.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: print an enum
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4227

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135611.15350.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4229


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4229] New: print a volatile
Message-ID: <20070321135610.4229.cagney@redhat.com>

(this one is just a sanity check)

-- 
           Summary: print a volatile
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4229

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135655.15691.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4230


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4231] New: what struct
Message-ID: <20070321135724.4231.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: what struct
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4231

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4230] New: what array
Message-ID: <20070321135655.4230.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: what array
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4230

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:57:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:57:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135724.16285.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4231


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135831.16833.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4232


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4232] New: array of TYPE - look through typedef
Message-ID: <20070321135830.4232.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: array of TYPE - look through typedef
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4232

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4233] New: struct member of TYPE
Message-ID: <20070321135902.4233.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: struct member of TYPE
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4233

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4234] New: print array[x][y]
Message-ID: <20070321135938.4234.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: print array[x][y]
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135939.17494.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4234


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 13:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321135902.17131.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4233


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 14:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321140028.18985.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4235


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 14:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4235] New: print struct { struct { ... } }
Message-ID: <20070321140027.4235.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: print struct { struct { ... } }
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 14:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4236] New: make a function call
Message-ID: <20070321140231.4236.cagney@redhat.com>

 

-- 
           Summary: make a function call
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4236

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 14:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321140232.20619.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4236


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 15:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4149] Assistant missing [optional] what happens next page
In-Reply-To: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306212438.4149.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321155403.2207.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-21 15:54 -------
I have a few suggestions to solve this, and the Quick Debug button problem.
Doing screen shots its time consuming so I will try to describe it verbally and
people feel they need screen shots, I throw some together.

[1] Merge Session Manager into the Assitant so that it becomes page 1
[2] At the bottom *always* have present a next, back, and finish (start?)  
    button.
    clicking the finish button takes you directly to frysk with the default or
    the previously saved settings
[3] Page 2 of the session is a page which enables the user to choose from a 
    Traditional debugging session or a Monitoring Session, something like what   
    is in the attached screen shot 
    (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1629&action=view).
    My feeling is that this should only effect what window (source or monitor)
    is presented first, and that the user can always switch between the modes
    even after the session has been started.

The rest of the pages remain the same. Thoughts ?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4149

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 19:58:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:58:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3023] EventViewer Feature Request: Complex traces
In-Reply-To: <20060810152733.3023.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20060810152733.3023.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321195822.24376.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-21 19:58 -------
Event height will probably not be variabled.

fine lines coule be incerted in the background to inidcate cpu,memory usage

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3023

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321201042.6578.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4238


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4238] New: "run" with no arguments re-runs same program
Message-ID: <20070321201042.4238.cagney@redhat.com>

Given:

(hpd) run /a/program

then can a later:

(hpd) run

re-invoke the same program with same arguments.

-- 
           Summary: "run" with no arguments re-runs same program
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4238

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321201415.8102.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4239


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:14:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:14:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4239] New: print each breakpoint as added
Message-ID: <20070321201415.4239.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance:

  (hpd) break main
  Breakpoint 0 created
  (hpd) run /a/program
  <<Breakpoint 0 inserted at 0x... main.c#28>>
  (hpd)
  Breakpoint 0 hit. [ don't quote me on that one]
  (hpd)

This way the user knows that each breakpoint has been inserted when/if expected.

-- 
           Summary: print each breakpoint as added
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4239

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4240] New: permit breakpoints before an executable is running
Message-ID: <20070321201712.4240.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance:

  (hpd) break #main.c#28
  Breakpoint 0 created.
  (hpd) run /a/program
  Program NN started.
  (hpd)
  Breakpoint 0 at NN hit.

This implies that high-level breakpoints are always lazy, monitoring events that
modify the address space.

-- 
           Summary: permit breakpoints before an executable is running
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4240

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321201712.9397.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4240


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4241] New: specify breakpoint before solib load
Message-ID: <20070321202006.4241.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance:

  (hpd) break #solib.so#file.c#29
  Breakpoint 1 created
  (hpd) go
  (hpd)
  Breakpoint 1 inserted at 0x... in solib.so.
  (hpd)
  Breakpoint 1 hit
  (hpd)

that is, the breakpoint monitors shared library load/unload events adding and
removing the breakpoint as libraries are added and deleted.

-- 
           Summary: specify breakpoint before solib load
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4241

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202008.11758.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4241


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3896] cntrl-d hangs fhpd cli
In-Reply-To: <20070119231026.3896.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070119231026.3896.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202148.14848.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-21 20:21 -------
Still occures in 2007-03-21 build.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3896

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202328.15559.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4242


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4242] New: (hpd) run <tab>
Message-ID: <20070321202325.4242.cagney@redhat.com>

The <tab> for commands should be sensative to the command that it applied to,
for instance:

  (hpd) run /a/<TAB>
  /a/file  /a/program
  (hpd)

-- 
           Summary: (hpd) run <tab>
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4003] running frysk.bindir.TestFhd scrambles tty
In-Reply-To: <20070208021622.4003.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070208021622.4003.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202535.16691.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|cagney at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4003

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:27:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:27:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202733.17959.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2246 depends on bug 4003, which changed state.

Bug 4003 Summary: running frysk.bindir.TestFhd scrambles tty
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4003

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3212] Eventviewer Tracker
In-Reply-To: <20060914203904.3212.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20060914203904.3212.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321202809.18265.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3212 depends on bug 3982, which changed state.

Bug 3982 Summary: Eventviewer does not provide observer information
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3982

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3212

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321203712.22778.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4244


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:37:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:37:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4244] New: funit --gc -- run the garbage collector after each test
Message-ID: <20070321203711.4244.cagney@redhat.com>

Often there are memory corruption bugs triggered by garbage collection.

Being able to force a garbage collection after each bug would help more quickly
narrow that down.

NB: Triggering a GC is non-trivial, the sequence:
  System.gc(); // please garbage collect when you have a mo'
  Thread.wait (100); // here's a mo'.
works relatively well.

-- 
           Summary: funit --gc -- run the garbage collector after each test
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4244

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4245] New: funit --unresolved -- include unresolved a.k.a. broken
Message-ID: <20070321203813.4245.cagney@redhat.com>

Instead of skipping unresolved tests, run them anyway.

-- 
           Summary: funit --unresolved -- include unresolved a.k.a. broken
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2242
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2242] [tracker] funit: command to run frysk's junit tests
In-Reply-To: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131173843.2242.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321203813.23099.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4245


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2242

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2234] [tracker] Test Framework - funit, make check, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131154950.2234.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321203931.23419.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4246


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 20:39:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:39:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4246] New: frysk.sys.TerminalSize untested
Message-ID: <20070321203931.4246.cagney@redhat.com>

The object frysk.sys.Size, aka frysk.sys.TerminalSize, is untested.

-- 
           Summary: frysk.sys.TerminalSize untested
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2234
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4247] New: hpd hangs on second run
Message-ID: <20070321222558.4247.cagney@redhat.com>

For instance:

  $ ./funit-stackframe
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)
  $ ../bindir/fhpd
  (fhpd) run ./funit-stackframe
  runState state = 0
  Attached to process 0
  (fhpd) go
  runState state = 1
  (fhpd) run ./funit-stackframe
  runState state = 1

-- 
           Summary: hpd hangs on second run
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4247

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321222559.16888.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4247


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4248] New: indicate program crash / exit
Message-ID: <20070321223536.4248.cagney@redhat.com>

The progra funit-stackframe just crashes.  When run from fhpd nothing indicates
that the program has stopped or terminated.

$ ../bindir/fhpd
(fhpd) help go
go
Continue running a process, returning without blocking.  The go command
resumes execution of a collection of processes. The prompt will then be
returned so that the user can issue further commands; execution
continues behind the scene.
(fhpd) run ./funit-stackframe
runState state = 0
Attached to process 0
(fhpd) go
runState state = 1
(fhpd) where
#0 0x00bfb840 in [unknown]
(fhpd) where
#0 0x00bfb840 in [unknown]
(fhpd) go
runState state = 1
(fhpd) where
#0 0x00bfb840 in [unknown]
(fhpd)

-- 
           Summary: indicate program crash / exit
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4248

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321223538.19238.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4248


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4249] New: ftrace -c /bin/true -- Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.NullPointerException
Message-ID: <20070321224526.4249.cagney@redhat.com>

$ ../bindir/ftrace -c /bin/true
Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.util.Ftrace$1.update(ftrace)
   at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(libgcj.so.7)
   at frysk.proc.Host$ObservableXXX.notify(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Host.add(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Proc.<init>(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Proc.<init>(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.<init>(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$ProcChanges.update(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$ProcChanges.update(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$ProcChanges.update(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$ProcChanges.update(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendrecSelf(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Host.getSelf(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendCreateAttachedProc(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHostState$1.handleCreateAttachedProc(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Host$3.execute(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(ftrace)

-- 
           Summary: ftrace -c /bin/true -- Exception in thread "Thread-1"
                    java.lang.NullPointerException
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4249

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321224527.24896.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4249


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321224852.25688.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4250


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4250] New: ftrace does not follow threads
Message-ID: <20070321224851.4250.cagney@redhat.com>

$ ../bindir/ftrace -o /tmp/ftrace.out ../bindir/ftrace
ftrace: no command or PID specified
ftrace: Try 'ftrace -help' for more information
$ head !$
head /tmp/ftrace.out
Ftrace.main() Proc.getPid() 2617
....
$ grep -v 2617.2617 !$
grep -v 2617.2617 /tmp/ftrace.out
Ftrace.main() Proc.getPid() 2617
Ftrace.main() Proc.getExe()
/home/scratch/frysk/native/frysk-core/frysk/bindir/ftrace

i.e., only output from the main thread is present

-- 
           Summary: ftrace does not follow threads
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4250

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4251] New: quit gives NPE
Message-ID: <20070321225051.4251.cagney@redhat.com>

(fhpd) quit
quit
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI$DetachHandler.handle(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI$QuitHandler.handle(fhpd)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.CLI.execCommand(fhpd)
   at fhpd.main(fhpd)
Internal debugger error:

-- 
           Summary: quit gives NPE
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2246
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4251

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2246] [tracker] fhd: Frysk High Performance Debugger Forum Command Line Interface
In-Reply-To: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174214.2246.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321225052.26176.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4251


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2246

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321225904.28122.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4252


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 22:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4252] New: Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.RuntimeException: Negative syscall number: -1
Message-ID: <20070321225904.4252.cagney@redhat.com>

$ ../bindir/ftrace -o /tmp/o ../../TestRunner
Running testBadArguments(frysk.bindir.TestFcore) ...open (old controlling
terminal): No such device or address
PASS
Running testBadConsoleParameter(frysk.bindir.TestFcore) ...open (old controlling
terminal): No such device or address
PASS
...
Running testAbandonAndAbandon(frysk.proc.TestAbandon) ...PASS
Running testHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...PASS
Running testSteppingtestHitAndRun(frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints) ...Exception in
thread "Thread-1" java.lang.RuntimeException: Negative syscall number: -1
   at frysk.proc.Syscall.syscallByNum(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32Syscall.syscallByNum(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxIa32$1.getSyscall(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.StracePrinter.handle(ftrace)
   at frysk.util.Ftrace$SyscallObserver.updateSyscallExit(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifySyscallExit(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$Running.handleSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processSyscalledEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.syscallEvent(ftrace)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(ftrace)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(ftrace)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(ftrace)

-- 
           Summary: Exception in thread "Thread-1"
                    java.lang.RuntimeException: Negative syscall number: -1
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4252

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 23:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4253] New: strange <<open (old controlling terminal): No such device or address>> message
Message-ID: <20070321230009.4253.cagney@redhat.com>

cagney@nettle$ ../bindir/ftrace -o /tmp/o ../../TestRunner
Running testBadArguments(frysk.bindir.TestFcore) ...open (old controlling
terminal): No such device or address
PASS
Running testBadConsoleParameter(frysk.bindir.TestFcore) ...open (old controlling
terminal): No such device or address
PASS
....

-- 
           Summary: strange <<open (old controlling terminal): No such
                    device or address>> message
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2245
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4253

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 21 23:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2245] [tracker] ftrace: standalone program for displaying a system call trace
In-Reply-To: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131174114.2245.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070321230011.28587.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4253


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2245

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 10:08:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4252] Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.RuntimeException: Negative syscall number: -1
In-Reply-To: <20070321225904.4252.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070321225904.4252.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322100846.16224.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-22 10:08 -------
This is related to the various syscall discussions in the past:


- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/frysk/2006-q1/msg00091.html
  (About system call handling in Frysk)
- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/frysk/2006-q3/msg00305.html
  (get syscall num in updateSyscallExit)
- http://sourceware.org/ml/frysk/2006-q3/msg00510.html
  (System call number cached with help from SyscallObserver)
- bug #3185 (ftrace printing deficiencies)

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4252

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 13:35:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:35:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4222] Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322133433.26098.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 13:34 -------
2007-03-22  Mike Cvet  <mcvet@redhat.com>

	* SourceWindow.java (generateProcStackTrace): Only set frames for SymTab
	if the RunState is stopped. Addresses #4222.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 14:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (fkung at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4256] New: Monitor library calls as well as system calls
Message-ID: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>

Rather than only showing system calls in the monitor, it would be a nice feature
to monitor library calls as well.  It would be an extremely useful supplement to
backtraces when debugging a problem.

To reduce verbosity, a filter can be added so that only calls into specified
libraries are logged.

-- 
           Summary: Monitor library calls as well as system calls
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: fkung at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4256

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4257] New: Frysk monitor doesnot have a tool bar
Message-ID: <20070322151030.4257.swagiaal@redhat.com>

Add a tool bar to the frysk monitor to do the following:
* Add/remove procs from a session
* bring up source window on a an old stack back trace or a running thread

Please add other things you think might be usefull to this bug

-- 
           Summary: Frysk monitor doesnot have a tool bar
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
                CC: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4257

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322151006.22662.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 3700, which changed state.

Bug 3700 Summary: Line Stepping one-line-loopers should loop until user stops
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3700

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322151009.22690.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 3700, which changed state.

Bug 3700 Summary: Line Stepping one-line-loopers should loop until user stops
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3700

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322151032.22912.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4257


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4258] New: Users cannot return to session manager
Message-ID: <20070322151201.4258.swagiaal@redhat.com>

Provied a way for users to go back to the session mamanger to edit the current
session or switch sessions.

-- 
           Summary: Users cannot return to session manager
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
                CC: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4258

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:12:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:12:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322151202.23391.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4258


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:20:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:20:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4259] New: java.lang.RuntimeException: This method is not implemented (Nov 4, 2006)
Message-ID: <20070322151945.4259.mcvet@redhat.com>

So I ran the monitor on Nautilus with most of the available observers attached, 
except maybe clone, and then started clicking around to generate events in the 
monitor. 

Frysk and Nautilus appeared to freeze, and when the gnome "Force Quit?" dialog 
came up and I clicked 'yes', the following error popped up in a dialog from 
Frysk:

This method is not implemented (Nov 4, 2006)

java.lang.RuntimeException: This method is not implemented (Nov 4, 2006)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.eventviewer.EventViewer2.removeProc(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.eventviewer.EventViewer2$2.update(FryskGui)
   at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(libgcj.so.7rh)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.GuiObservable.notifyObservers(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.ObservableLinkedList.remove(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.sessions.DebugProcess.removeProc(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.sessions.DebugProcess$1.updateTerminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.notifyTerminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState.handleAttachedTerminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTaskState$15.handleTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Task.processTerminatedEvent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld$5.terminated(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Wait.waitAllNoHang(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost$PollWaitOnSigChld.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
   at frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.Gui$4.run(FryskGui)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

-- 
           Summary: java.lang.RuntimeException: This method is not
                    implemented (Nov 4, 2006)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4259

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:24:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:24:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4259] java.lang.RuntimeException: This method is not implemented (Nov 4, 2006)
In-Reply-To: <20070322151945.4259.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070322151945.4259.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322152429.1957.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 15:24 -------
This is what I am currently working on

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4243 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4259

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:38:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:38:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4260] New: ptrace complains about monitor stack tracing
Message-ID: <20070322153757.4260.mcvet@redhat.com>

With terminating, fork, exec and clone observers on nautilus, and then making 
it fork, it prints into the background:

Call stack is broken - couldn't unwind!
ptrace: No such process
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.peekRegisters(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.RegisterSetBuffer.refresh(FryskGui)
   at frysk.sys.RegisterSetBuffer.peek(FryskGui)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.peekFully(FryskGui)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.get(FryskGui)
   at frysk.proc.Register.get(FryskGui)
   at frysk.rt.StackCallbacks.accessReg(FryskGui)
   at lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.unwind_setup(FryskGui)
   at lib.unwind.StackTraceCreator.createStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.rt.StackFactory.createStackFrame(FryskGui)
   at frysk.rt.StackFactory.createStackFrame(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.actions.CaptureStackFrameAction.execute(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.actions.TaskActionPoint.runActions(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.observers.TaskCloneObserver.runActionsParent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.observers.TaskCloneObserver.bottomHalfParent(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.monitor.observers.TaskCloneObserver$1.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)

Which is likely caused by either the process not being blocked properly, or 
some other inconsistency with the Task being unwound.

-- 
           Summary: ptrace complains about monitor stack tracing
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4260

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 15:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4222] Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
In-Reply-To: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191100.4222.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322153952.19380.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 15:39 -------
I can't reproduce the lib.dw error, but do still get the SourceWindow 
nullpointer.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 17:56:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4256] Monitor library calls as well as system calls
In-Reply-To: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
References: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322175632.14319.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 17:56 -------
Yes. This is definatly a vaid functionality. One way we plan to address this is
through something called tag sets. Basically you instrument your souce code, or
the source code of a library with check points. These check points then cause
the monitor to draw events when they are reached during execution.

People can then share TagSets for library foo.so.

Anyone have any other ways for monitoring library calls ?.. is a library call
any different from a regular function call after the library has been loaded ?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4256

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:01:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4255] libunwind needs to be built for multiple platforms.
In-Reply-To: <20070322143233.4255.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070322143233.4255.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322180100.15669.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 18:01 -------
directories have to be created for each platform we support.

I.e. 

mkdir -p libunwind-i386
cd libunwind-i386
$srcdir/libunwind/configure --target=i386-unknown-linux-gnu

this target is in frysk-imports/configure.ac but is currently not working.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|npremji at redhat dot com   |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4255

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4261] New: Host.java sets LinuxPtraceHostStates
Message-ID: <20070322180210.4261.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

Host.java is abstract and should be HostState agnostic. Set HostStests in
LinuxPtraceHost instead.

-- 
           Summary: Host.java sets LinuxPtraceHostStates
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4261

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4261] Host.java sets LinuxPtraceHostStates
In-Reply-To: <20070322180210.4261.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070322180210.4261.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322180306.16210.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|pmuldoon at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4261

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4256] Monitor library calls as well as system calls
In-Reply-To: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
References: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322180330.16348.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 18:03 -------
> Anyone have any other ways for monitoring library calls ?.. is a library call
> any different from a regular function call after the library has been loaded ?

Identical.

(well sometimes its a call through a function pointer, and sometimes through a
"thunk").

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4256

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3971] Task.java sets subclass states (LinuxPtraceTaskState)
In-Reply-To: <20070205154922.3971.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070205154922.3971.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322180704.17286.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|pmuldoon at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3971

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 18:16:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4263] New: Proc/Task/Host.java refer to Manager.eventloop which is incorrect
Message-ID: <20070322181604.4263.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

The Host.java implementation constructor takes a specific Eventloop as a
parameter in the Host constructor. Proc and Task should use the eventloop passed
as a parameter to Host over the static reference defined in Manager.

-- 
           Summary: Proc/Task/Host.java refer to Manager.eventloop which is
                    incorrect
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4263

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 19:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4264] New: More debuginfo strangeness
Message-ID: <20070322190845.4264.mcvet@redhat.com>

Usually, installing a package with debuginfo results in Frysk not being able to 
find the source anyway. 

However, sometimes, as with gcalctool, one or two frames of the program can be 
resolved. There doesn't seem to be any way to tell which programs will work and 
which ones won't.

-- 
           Summary: More debuginfo strangeness
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com,rmoseley at redhat dot
                    com,swagiaal at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4264

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 19:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4265] New: In LinuxPtraceProcState Detaching State, using Proc.getTasks() maybe problematic
Message-ID: <20070322192619.4265.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

The state needs to know a full set of tasks to be constructed, but in a detached
state .getTasks() may not return the full set of tasks.

-- 
           Summary: In LinuxPtraceProcState Detaching State, using
                    Proc.getTasks() maybe problematic
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4265

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 19:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2935] [tracker] Runtime Model - frysk.rt
In-Reply-To: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
References: <20060717185017.2935.ajocksch@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322193205.7505.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2935 depends on bug 4222, which changed state.

Bug 4222 Summary: Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2935

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 19:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322193205.7519.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4222, which changed state.

Bug 4222 Summary: Frysk crashes when trying to open the source window to view a stack trace
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4222

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
             Status|WAITING                     |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 22 19:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4256] Monitor library calls as well as system calls
In-Reply-To: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
References: <20070322145908.4256.fkung@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070322193215.7563.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-22 19:32 -------
This is done by ltrace (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/ltrace)
thanks to cagney for the pointer.

I couldnt quickly tell from the code but one possibility is that it monitors all
library loads then sets breakpoints on all the functions of a library as soon as
it is loaded.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4256

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 12:46:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:46:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4223] Source window slowness
In-Reply-To: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
References: <20070320191925.4223.rmoseley@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323124548.5051.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |3392
              nThis|                            |
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 14:29:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4268] New: LinuxCoreFile.java needs frysk-imports/.../core file in build/frysk-core/.... directory
Message-ID: <20070323142903.4268.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

LinuxCoreFile invokes LinuxCoreFile{Host|Proc|Tasks} and needs a vald core file
in the pkgdatadir for testing. Two already exist in frysk-imports. Fix the build
scripts to copy the core file from frysk-imports to frysk-core.

-- 
           Summary: LinuxCoreFile.java needs frysk-imports/.../core file in
                    build/frysk-core/.... directory
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4268

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 14:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4214] selecting two processes gets two source windows
In-Reply-To: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323144037.18266.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-23 14:40 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1709 ***

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 14:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1709] Multiple source window tabs
In-Reply-To: <20051030010226.1709.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051030010226.1709.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323144038.18278.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-23 14:40 -------
*** Bug 4214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1709

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 14:41:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:41:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323144039.18288.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4214, which changed state.

Bug 4214 Summary: selecting two processes gets two source windows
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 15:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3392] [tracker] Source Code, or Static Language Model - frysk.dom (well sort of)
In-Reply-To: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018195742.3392.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323155411.24203.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3392 depends on bug 4223, which changed state.

Bug 4223 Summary: Source window slowness
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3392

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 15:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323155412.24211.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4223, which changed state.

Bug 4223 Summary: Source window slowness
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4223

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 16:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4268] LinuxCoreFile.java needs frysk-imports/.../core file in build/frysk-core/.... directory
In-Reply-To: <20070323142903.4268.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070323142903.4268.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323160230.28753.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-23 16:02 -------
Index: frysk-core/ChangeLog
2007-03-23  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

	* Makefile.am (frysk/pkgdatadir/test-core)
	(frysk/pkgdatadir/test-core-mt-fp): New targets, link to
	frysk-imports files.  Add to CLEANFILES and noinst_DATA.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4268

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 16:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2235] [tracker] Build problems - in Makefile.am, configure.ac, ...
In-Reply-To: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060131155817.2235.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323160231.28761.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 2235 depends on bug 4268, which changed state.

Bug 4268 Summary: LinuxCoreFile.java needs frysk-imports/.../core file in build/frysk-core/.... directory
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4268

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2235

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:04:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (scox at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:04:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4227] print an enum
In-Reply-To: <20070321135253.4227.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070321135253.4227.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323190417.7316.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|scox at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4227

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:31:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:31:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
In-Reply-To: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
References: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323193107.21599.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-23 19:31 -------

March 23, 2007
frysk-core/frysk/rt/CL
* StackAccessors.java (accessReg): Check that register sizes are the same.
	* StackFactory.java (createStackTrace): Use task's ISA to determine which
	Unwinder to create.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|npremji at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4270] New: 32 bit on 64 bit: testAttached(frysk.rt.TestFrame)ptrace: Input/output error
Message-ID: <20070323193626.4270.npremji@redhat.com>

./frysk-core/TestRunner -arch 32 frysk.rt.TestFrame.testAttached

gives: 
testAttached(frysk.rt.TestFrame)ptrace: Input/output error
   at frysk.sys.Errno.throwErrno(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.notifyPtraceThread(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.Ptrace.peek(TestRunner)
   at frysk.sys.PtraceByteBuffer.peek(TestRunner)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.peekFully(TestRunner)
   at inua.eio.ByteBuffer.get(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.StackAccessors.accessMem(TestRunner)
   at lib.unwind.UnwindX86.step(TestRunner)
   at lib.unwind.Cursor.step(TestRunner)
   at lib.unwind.Cursor.unwind(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.Frame.getOuter(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestFrame.backtrace(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestFrame.testAttached(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArch32Cases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: 32 bit on 64 bit:
                    testAttached(frysk.rt.TestFrame)ptrace: Input/output
                    error
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3999
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4270

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:36:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3999] On x86_64 Frysk uses the x86_64 version of libunwind to trace 32-bit programs
In-Reply-To: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
References: <20070207214447.3999.kgallowa@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323193627.23433.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4270


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3999

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323194808.29380.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4214, which changed state.

Bug 4214 Summary: selecting two processes gets two source windows
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 19:48:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:48:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4214] selecting two processes gets two source windows
In-Reply-To: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323194808.29373.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-23 19:48 -------
This about getting a single source window with a list of processes in the
process/thread pane.  Not multiple source window tabs.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 20:45:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4271] New: testSteppingtestInsertRemove hangs intermittently on FC6 x86_64
Message-ID: <20070323204542.4271.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

Running the frysk-core test suite, I experience intermittent hangs on the
testSteppingtestInsertRemove test.  Preliminary opinion is that the code is
waiting for a signal that is never delivered.

Thread 1:
#0  0x00000034d200cbfb in read () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x000000000052b275 in frysk::testbed::ForkTestLib$ForkedInputStream::read (
    this=0x2aaaaaf67a50, buf=<value optimized out>, off=0, len=2048)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/testbed/cni/ForkTestLib.cxx:144
#2  0x00000034d44989a5 in java::io::BufferedInputStream::refill ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#3  0x00000034d449cca0 in java::io::InputStreamReader::refill ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#4  0x00000034d449cefb in java::io::InputStreamReader::read ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#5  0x00000034d4498304 in java::io::BufferedReader::fill ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#6  0x00000034d44a2fc8 in java::io::BufferedReader::readLine ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#7  0x00000000004c5af1 in frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testInsertRemove()void (
    this=0x2aaaaaf70c40)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-core/frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java:422
#8  0x00000000004c4346 in
frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints.testSteppingtestInsertRemove()void (this=0xc)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-core/frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java:549
#9  0x00000034d48e630c in _Jv_strtod_r () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#10 0x00000034d48e6198 in _Jv_strtod_r () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#11 0x00000034d41b58e5 in _Jv_CallAnyMethodA () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#12 0x00000034d41b6030 in _Jv_CallAnyMethodA () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#13 0x00000034d41b6383 in java::lang::reflect::Method::invoke ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#14 0x0000000000540e86 in junit.framework.TestCase.runTest()void (
    this=<value optimized out>) at junit/framework/TestCase.java:154
#15 0x0000000000540cb6 in junit.framework.TestCase.runBare()void (
    this=<value optimized out>) at junit/framework/TestCase.java:127
#16 0x00000000005429d4 in junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect()void (
    this=<value optimized out>) at junit/framework/TestResult.java:106
#17 0x00000000005416a2 in
junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(junit.framework.Test,
junit.framework.Protectable)void (this=0x2aaaab2e7190, 
    test=0x2aaaaaf70c40, p=0x2aaaab269708)
    at junit/framework/TestResult.java:124
#18 0x0000000000541603 in
junit.framework.TestResult.run(junit.framework.TestCase)void
(this=0x2aaaab2e7190, test=0x2aaaaaf70c40)
    at junit/framework/TestResult.java:109
#19 0x0000000000540c84 in
junit.framework.TestCase.run(junit.framework.TestResult)void
(this=0xfffffffffffffe00, result=0xc)
    at junit/framework/TestCase.java:118
#20 0x00000000005404b1 in junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(junit.framework.Test
, junit.framework.TestResult)void (this=<value optimized out>, 
    test=0x2aaaaaf70c40, result=0x2aaaab2e7190)
    at junit/framework/TestSuite.java:208
#21 0x000000000054046d in
junit.framework.TestSuite.run(junit.framework.TestResult)void (this=<value
optimized out>, result=0x2aaaab2e7190)
    at junit/framework/TestSuite.java:203
#22 0x00000000005404b1 in
junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(junit.framework.Test,
junit.framework.TestResult)void (this=<value optimized out>, 
    test=0x2aaaaaf47180, result=0x2aaaab2e7190)
    at junit/framework/TestSuite.java:208
#23 0x000000000054046d in
junit.framework.TestSuite.run(junit.framework.TestResult)void (this=<value
optimized out>, result=0x2aaaab2e7190)
    at junit/framework/TestSuite.java:203
#24 0x00000000005344d8 in junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(junit.framework.Test,
boolean)junit.framework.TestResult (this=0x2aaaaae06f00, suite=0x2aaaaae43a38, 
    wait=false) at junit/textui/TestRunner.java:116
#25 0x000000000053446c in
junit.textui.TestRunner.doRun(junit.framework.Test)junit.framework.TestResult
(this=0xc, test=0x2aaaab1db00c)
    at junit/textui/TestRunner.java:109
#26 0x000000000051cae7 in frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(java.util.Collection)int
    (this=0x2aaaaae06f00, testClasses=<value optimized out>)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/junit/Runner.java:289
#27 0x000000000051ce30 in
frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(java.util.Collection)int (this=0x2aaaaae06f00,
testClasses=0x2aaaaab107a8)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/junit/Runner.java:330
#28 0x000000000051c0af in frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(java.util.Collection,
frysk.Config, java.util.Collection, frysk.Config)int (this=0x2aaaaae06f00, 
    tests=0x2aaaaab107a8, config=<value optimized out>, 
    tests32=0x2aaaaab10668, config32=0x2aaaaadb4ab0)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/junit/Runner.java:625
#29 0x00000000004b7dc6 in TestRunner.main(java.lang.String[])void (
    args=0x2aaaaaae8f60) at TestRunner.java:63
#30 0x00000034d41a41b3 in gnu::java::lang::MainThread::call_main ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#31 0x00000034d41f925e in gnu::java::lang::MainThread::run ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#32 0x00000034d41b2738 in _Jv_ThreadRun () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#33 0x00000034d4175a05 in _Jv_RunMain () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#34 0x00000000004b7d16 in main (argc=-1424117748, argv=0x800)
    at /tmp/cc93VWxo.i:14

Thread 2:
#0  0x00000034d14c4a36 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000000000528397 in frysk::sys::Poll::poll (pollObserver=0x2aaaaaf67ad0, 
    timeout=-1)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/sys/cni/Poll.cxx:197
#2  0x00000000004f2c9f in frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(boolean)void (
    this=0x2aaaab27e8e8, pendingOnly=32)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-core/frysk/event/EventLoop.java:317
#3  0x00000000004f2d25 in frysk.event.EventLoop.run()void (this=0x2aaaab27e8e8)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-core/frysk/event/EventLoop.java:416
#4  0x00000000004c4a63 in frysk.proc.TestBreakpoints$EventLoopRunner.run()void
    (this=0x2aaaab1d3a80)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-core/frysk/proc/TestBreakpoints.java:943
#5  0x00000034d41b2738 in _Jv_ThreadRun () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#6  0x00000034d41b8f77 in _Jv_ThreadRegister () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#7  0x00000034d48f6a66 in _Jv_strtod_r () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#8  0x00000034d2006305 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#9  0x00000034d14cd50d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Thread 3:
#0  0x00000034d200a416 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
   from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x00000034d41b93bc in _Jv_CondWait () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#2  0x00000034d41aed60 in java::lang::Object::wait ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#3  0x000000000051e7cc in frysk.sys.Ptrace$PtraceThread.run()void (
    this=0x2aaaab10bcc0)
    at
/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_fresh/frysk_config/frysk-imports/frysk/sys/Ptrace.java:220
#4  0x00000034d41b2738 in _Jv_ThreadRun () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#5  0x00000034d41b8f77 in _Jv_ThreadRegister () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#6  0x00000034d48f6a66 in _Jv_strtod_r () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#7  0x00000034d2006305 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#8  0x00000034d14cd50d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#9  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Thread 4:
#0  0x00000034d200a416 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
   from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x00000034d41b93bc in _Jv_CondWait () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#2  0x00000034d41a386c in gnu::gcj::runtime::FinalizerThread::run ()
   from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#3  0x00000034d41b2738 in _Jv_ThreadRun () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#4  0x00000034d41b8f77 in _Jv_ThreadRegister () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#5  0x00000034d48f6a66 in _Jv_strtod_r () from /usr/lib64/libgcj.so.7rh
#6  0x00000034d2006305 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#7  0x00000034d14cd50d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

-- 
           Summary: testSteppingtestInsertRemove hangs intermittently on FC6
                    x86_64
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4271

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 20:47:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4271] testSteppingtestInsertRemove hangs intermittently on FC6 x86_64
In-Reply-To: <20070323204542.4271.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
References: <20070323204542.4271.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <20070323204721.30164.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mark at klomp dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4271

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 21:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3393] [tracker] Type System - frysk.type
In-Reply-To: <20061018203414.3393.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061018203414.3393.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070323210303.1726.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4272


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3393

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 23 21:03:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:03:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4272] New: ArrayType iterator limited to Java's primitive types
Message-ID: <20070323210302.4272.cagney@redhat.com>

The ArrayType contains the code:

	public Object next ()
	{
	    if (type.typeId == BaseTypes.baseTypeChar)
		return new Character((char)v.getByte(idx * type.getSize()));
	    else if (type.typeId == BaseTypes.baseTypeShort)
		return new Integer(v.getShort(idx * type.getSize()));
	    else if (type.typeId == BaseTypes.baseTypeInteger)

this doesn't work - as the "type" could be a pointer, or some other more
abstract type.

Instead the iteratore should use "ByteBuffer.slice" to slice the underlying
array of bytes and then create a Variable from that.

-- 
           Summary: ArrayType iterator limited to Java's primitive types
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 3393
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4272

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Sat Mar 24 21:22:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:22:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4273] New: LinuxCoreHost causes memory corruption when run multiple times
Message-ID: <20070324212246.4273.pmuldoon@redhat.com>

a double free or corruption glibc traceback occurs when the class is run
multiple times. 

Investgiating GC issues.

-- 
           Summary: LinuxCoreHost causes memory corruption when run multiple
                    times
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4273

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 13:10:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1711] Assembly and source in separate panes
In-Reply-To: <20051030010808.1711.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051030010808.1711.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326131039.24914.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1711

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 13:28:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:28:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4279] New: libunwind install ignores configure prefix
Message-ID: <20070326142837.4279.mark@klomp.org>

When configuring with ../frysk/autogen.sh --prefix /usr/local/frysk the
libunwind library isn't getting installed in the right prefix

$ ../frysk/autogen.sh --prefix /usr/local/frysk && make && make install
[...]
make[6]: Entering directory
`/home/mark/src/frysk-obj/frysk-imports/libunwind-i386/src'
test -z "/usr/local/lib" || mkdir -p -- "/usr/local/lib"
test -z "/usr/local/lib" || mkdir -p -- "/usr/local/lib"
 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c  'libunwind-x86.la'
'/usr/local/lib/libunwind-x86.la'
/usr/bin/install -c .libs/libunwind-x86.so.7.0.0
/usr/local/lib/libunwind-x86.so.7.0.0
/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file
`/usr/local/lib/libunwind-x86.so.7.0.0': Permission denied
make[6]: *** [install-libLTLIBRARIES] Error 1

-- 
           Summary: libunwind install ignores configure prefix
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: npremji at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4279

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 14:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4280] New: testAttachToAttachedOtherTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)junit.framework.Ass
Message-ID: <20070326152632.4280.cmoller@redhat.com>

2)
testAttachToAttachedOtherTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (terminated)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.attachToAttachedTask(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestTaskObserver.testAttachToAttachedOtherTask(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testAttachToAttachedOtherTask(frysk.proc.TestTaskObserve
                    r)junit.framework.Ass
                    ertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
                    (terminated)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cmoller at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4280

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 16:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326161308.16778.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4269, which changed state.

Bug 4269 Summary: TimeLines have artifacts
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4269

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 16:13:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:13:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4243] Removed Porcs/Threads are not handled
In-Reply-To: <20070321203058.4243.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070321203058.4243.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326161312.16998.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 17:13 -------
Add a way to indicate the life time of a thread/proc:
suggestions:
   - draw the life time area brighter than the dead area.
   - cut off the line in the button with a couple black ticks
* see what project management software does to represent a lifetime of a task
(gant).

2007-03-26  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * test/TestPrototypeCopying.java: Added test for copying of filter
        boolean value.
        * test/TestObserverSaveLoad.java: Added test for filter boolean value.
        * gladedir/procpop.glade: Added "Observer Discription" feild to Edit
        Observer Dialog.

2007-03-26  Sami Wagiaalla  <swagiaal@redhat.com>

        * eventviewer/TimeLineStartEvent.java: New file.
        * eventviewer/TimeLineEndEvent.java: New file.
        * eventviewer/TimeLine.java: Added button for removing timelines.
        * eventviewer/ProcTimeLine.java (getGuiProc): made it public.
        * eventviewer/ProcBox.java: Added handling for removing dead threads.
Fix for
        bz 4243.
        * eventviewer/EventViewer2.java: Added and expose listiner to handle
redrawing
        fix for bz# 4269.
        Added handling for removing dead processes. Fix for bz 4243.
        * ObserversDialog.java: Added 'Observer Description' field, and handling.
        * EditObserverDialog.java: Renamed observerDescriptionTextView to 
        editObserverDialogObserverDescriptionTextView.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |swagiaal at redhat dot com
         AssignedTo|swagiaal at redhat dot com  |frysk-bugzilla at sourceware
                   |                            |dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4243

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 16:26:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:26:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326162605.28391.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 17:26 -------
What's happening is that in TestTaskTerminateObserver.java,
Terminate.updateTerminating(...) is never executed when funit-exit is passed a -
Sig.KILL_.  Before I go to all the effort of possibly re-chasing an already
chased bug, I thought I'd ask about the possibility that this is related to the
x-state bug; i.e., is a "terminating" condition related to the transient X
state?  If so, if you SIGKILL a process, is it possible to miss a "terminating"
and go straight to "terminated?"

(A little background for Roland, to whom I've cc-ed this:  this is a bug where a
process being sent a kill(SIGKILL) should trigger a "terminating" observer, but
doesn't seem to be doing that.)

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |roland at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 16:32:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4273] LinuxCoreHost causes memory corruption when run multiple times
In-Reply-To: <20070324212246.4273.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
References: <20070324212246.4273.pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326163221.31353.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 17:32 -------
Actually it was ElfData:

	2007-03-24  Phil Muldoon  <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
	
	* ElfData.java (elf_data_create_native): Made decl private.
	(elf_data_finalize): Ditto.
	* cni/ElfData.cxx (elf_data_create_native): Use java long
	pointer instead of native global pointer. Do not return a
	pointer.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4273

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 16:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326165506.8431.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 17:55 -------
The waitpid call should return a reasonable value.  For instance:

-> some sort of error indication, for instance ESRCH, EINTR, ...

-> PID killed with -9

But instead it's getting back that the process exited with 128.

Our tests show that exit47, the previous bug, is fixed.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 17:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1839] [tracker] GCC, GCJ, and CLASSPATH - the build and runtime tools
In-Reply-To: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051110155523.1839.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326173444.654.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4282


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1839

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 17:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4282] New: final variable and inner class corrupt.
Message-ID: <20070326183443.4282.npremji@redhat.com>

Example on branch npremji-final-inner-class-broken-bug-20070326-branch.

compile and run frysk-core/TestRunner -c FINEST frysk.rt.TestFrame.

aborts, can see :
26-Mar-07 12:30:20 PM lib.unwind.UnwindX86 getProcName
FINE: lib.unwind.UnwindX86@49418 getProcName cursor: 0x13f600, maxNameSize: 100

26-Mar-07 12:30:20 PM lib.unwind.PtraceAccessors getProcName
FINE: lib.unwind.PtraceAccessors@2717c8 getProcName address: 0x64, maxNameSize:
1248848903

-- 
           Summary: final variable and inner class corrupt.
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: npremji at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1839
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4282

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 18:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4163] create custom observer double step
In-Reply-To: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070306220819.4163.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326180916.26596.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|swagiaal at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4163

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 18:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326181755.31490.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4278, which changed state.

Bug 4278 Summary: Get assembly view working
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4278

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 18:18:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326181806.31604.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 1711, which changed state.

Bug 1711 Summary: Assembly and source in separate panes
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1711

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 18:34:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:34:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326183415.7403.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 19:34 -------
Okay, I'll chase that, but it's not the only possibility. 
TestTaskTerminateObserver.Terminate initialises int terminating = INVALID (where
INVALID = 128), but public Action updateTerminating (...) never runs, leaving
terminating = INVALID, which is the proximate cause of the failure.  I'll wire
up the waitpid() and check if it's causing the problem.

The exit47 test does indeed pass.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 20:11:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:11:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326201055.26189.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 21:10 -------
Ah, so it is seeing no notification at all that the task was terminated?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 20:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326202332.2574.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 21:23 -------
Yeah, for SIGKILL, updateTerminating never gets hit; updateTerminated does.  The
pattern of waitpid returns is similar in all test cases (terminate(),
terminated(), and terminating()), nothing unexpected, but the first two fail for
a lack of a terminating event.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 20:51:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:51:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326205135.31836.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-26 21:51 -------
Nice analysis.

Can you check that this is an intended behavior change with Roland.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Mon Mar 26 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (roland at gnu dot org)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070326205219.1044.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org  2007-03-26 21:52 -------
I don't know what's going on in the frysk world, but a couple things from the
kernel side might be relevant.

First is that for death by SIGKILL you may well not see any EXIT event
(WIFSTOPPED, SIGTRAP|PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT<<16).
You will see the death event (WIFSIGNALED) for sure except possibly in the case
of multi-threaded exec by a non-leader thread (when you won't see a report from
the old leader, but the exec'ing thread will change its PID to the leader's).

Second is there is a rare race bug in kernels before the recent test kernels,
that can produce a bogus wait status value.  The bogus value will be a
WIFSTOPPED with WSTOPSIG 0 or some high bits set.  This is a very unlikely race.
 Also, it doesn't produce a WIFEXITED value in the bug case, so it doesn't seem
likely to be relevant to what you are seeing.

Nothing comes to mind with a bogus status of 0x8000.  An _exit(128) produces
that status.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 03:40:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:40:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327033958.8533.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 04:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=1653)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1653&action=view)
side by side trace comparison

This attachment shows the diagnostic output of two failing tests and one
passing test, all of which do a kill(SIGKILL).	None of the tests get a
"terminating" event--the one that passes does so only because it's not
/expecting/ a terminating event.

None of the waitpid()s look wrong to me except possibly lines 13 and 14: should
there really be two waitpid()s in a row returning WIFSIGNALED(9) on the same
task?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 03:49:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (roland at gnu dot org)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:49:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327034906.10130.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From roland at gnu dot org  2007-03-27 04:49 -------
Your trace doesn't indicate whether different threads are doing different wait
calls or did ptrace calls or forks.  If thread A forks a child, and thread B
does PTRACE_ATTACH to that child, then on death there is one report "to B" (but
available to all threads in the same process calling wait*) and then there is a
second one "to A".  The second one happens because you are the real parent of
the child that is no longer ptrace'd after the ptracer's wait returns
WIFSIGNALED/WIFEXITED.  The first one happens because you are the ptracer but
not the real parent, but there are two of you so all things can be true and false.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 11:19:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:19:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4279] libunwind install ignores configure flags
In-Reply-To: <20070326142837.4279.mark@klomp.org>
References: <20070326142837.4279.mark@klomp.org>
Message-ID: <20070327111918.26963.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-27 12:19 -------
Added workaround suggested by Stepan for now:

2007-03-27  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>

        * configure.ac: Pass on host, build and prefix to libunwind-i386
        configure (and add FIXME).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |skasal at redhat dot com
            Summary|libunwind install ignores   |libunwind install ignores
                   |configure prefix            |configure flags


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4279

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 13:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4287] New: Children are not added to the monitor
Message-ID: <20070327142325.4287.swagiaal@redhat.com>

When a process forks its children should be caught and added to the monitor.
Although, perhaps, not to the session which will be saved.

Should they be blocked at main ?
Should the user decide ?
...

-- 
           Summary: Children are not added to the monitor
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
                CC: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4287

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 13:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327132326.21010.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4287


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 14:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327141721.29279.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4288, which changed state.

Bug 4288 Summary: quick debug doesn't open procs in RHS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4288

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 14:17:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327141720.29261.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4288, which changed state.

Bug 4288 Summary: quick debug doesn't open procs in RHS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4288

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 14:30:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:30:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4214] selecting two processes gets two source windows
In-Reply-To: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070319150051.4214.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327142954.2737.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 15:29 -------
I'll start taking a look at this then... it's going to require a fairly 
significant overhaul in /srcwin to work properly.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|REOPENED                    |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 14:50:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (npremji at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:50:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4282] final variable and inner class corrupt.
In-Reply-To: <20070326183443.4282.npremji@redhat.com>
References: <20070326183443.4282.npremji@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327145036.9779.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From npremji at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 15:50 -------
Created reproducer in frysk-imports/frysk4282.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4282

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 16:07:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cmoller at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:07:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3639] fc6:  testTerminateKillKILL(frysk.proc.TestTaskTerminateObserver)
In-Reply-To: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
References: <20061204180758.3639.cmoller@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327160733.31092.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cmoller at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 17:07 -------
Here's what's happening:

1. Wait.cxx:processStatus() decodes the waitpid status and if (WIFSTOPPED
(status) && (PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT ==  WSTOPEVENT (status))) it calls exitEvent()

2. LinuxPtraceHost.PollWaitOnSigChld.exitEvent() calls processTerminatingEvent()

3. Task.processTerminatingEvent() calls .handleTerminatingEvent()

4. LinuxPtraceTaskState.handleTerminatingEvent() calls notifyTerminating()

5. Task.notifyTerminating() calls updateTerminating()

6. TestTaskTerminateObserver. updateTerminating sets the int terminating value.

If, in Wait.cxx:processStatus(), status == 9,  (KILL), WIFSIGNALED (status) is
true rather than WIFSTOPPED (status), so none of the foregoing happens, causing
the test to fail.  What I don't know is if the process described above is in
fact what the programmer who wrote it intended and the test exercises conditions
that weren't meant to be exercised, or if the process described is flawed or
incomplete.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3639

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 16:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4289] New: testStepSigLongJmp(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (Attempting to add observer)
Message-ID: <20070327170903.4289.cagney@redhat.com>

$ uname -a
Linux nettle 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5 #1 Sun Mar 18 20:44:48 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
testStepSigLongJmp(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
event loop run explictly stopped (Attempting to add observer)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.proc.TestLib.assertRunUntilStop(TestRunner)
   at frysk.rt.TestStepping.testStepSigLongJmp(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runArchCases(TestRunner)
   at frysk.junit.Runner.runTestCases(TestRunner)
   at TestRunner.main(TestRunner)

-- 
           Summary: testStepSigLongJmp(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework
                    .AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped
                    (Attempting to add observer)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 2104
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4289

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 16:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2104] [tracker] Fedora Core 5
In-Reply-To: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20060103183536.2104.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327160904.32608.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4289


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2104

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 16:21:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:21:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4289] testStepSigLongJmp(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (Attempting to add observer)
In-Reply-To: <20070327170903.4289.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070327170903.4289.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327162058.4909.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-27 17:20 -------
Does this also happen with an older (pre-trace) 2.6.17 kernel or a newer 2.6.20
(2933 or higher) kernel with utrace fixes?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4289

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 20:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4289] testStepSigLongJmp(frysk.rt.TestStepping)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: event loop run explictly stopped (Attempting to add observer)
In-Reply-To: <20070327170903.4289.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070327170903.4289.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327203251.15811.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 21:32 -------
Its very likely this failure is just a result of the enormous amount of 
instruction stepping required for this test. I'll look into it soon.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|frysk-bugzilla at sourceware|mcvet at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4289

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1600] [tracker] The build and test environments, also portability issues
In-Reply-To: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029002301.1600.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327205232.22791.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4290


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1600

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/2137] gcj -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage fails
In-Reply-To: <20060110185346.2137.scox@redhat.com>
References: <20060110185346.2137.scox@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327205231.22779.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |4290
              nThis|                            |


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2137

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 20:52:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4290] New: [tracker] Debian etch and sid
Message-ID: <20070327215230.4290.cagney@redhat.com>

Tracker to help with etch and sid releases.

-- 
           Summary: [tracker] Debian etch and sid
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com
 BugsThisDependsOn: 2137
OtherBugsDependingO 1600
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4290

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Tue Mar 27 20:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (cagney at redhat dot com)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4290] [tracker] Debian etch and sid
In-Reply-To: <20070327215230.4290.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20070327215230.4290.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070327205324.23170.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From cagney at redhat dot com  2007-03-27 21:53 -------
Trackers are suspended.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4290

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 28 05:23:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4291] New: Building the tree created with 'make dist' fails in libunwind-i386
Message-ID: <20070328062318.4291.kris.van.hees@oracle.com>

Building using a tree created using 'make dist' fails with the following error:

 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_dist/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/src
-I../include
-I/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_dist/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/include
-I/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_dist/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind/include/tdep-x86
-I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -DUNW_REMOTE_ONLY -g -O2 -fexceptions -Wall
-Wsign-compare -MT x86/Gfetch_proc_info_post.lo -MD -MP -MF
x86/.deps/Gfetch_proc_info_post.Tpo -c x86/Gfetch_proc_info_post.c -o
x86/Gfetch_proc_info_post.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -fexceptions -Wall
-Wsign-compare   -o libunwind-x86.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -XCClinker
-nostartfiles -version-info 7:0:0           os-linux.lo mi/init.lo
mi/flush_cache.lo mi/mempool.lo mi/strerror.lo dwarf/global.lo elf32.lo
x86/is_fpreg.lo x86/regname.lo mi/Gdyn-extract.lo mi/Gdyn-remote.lo
mi/Gfind_dynamic_proc_info.lo mi/Gget_accessors.lo mi/Gget_proc_info_by_ip.lo
mi/Gget_proc_name.lo mi/Gput_dynamic_unwind_info.lo mi/Gdestroy_addr_space.lo
mi/Gget_reg.lo mi/Gset_reg.lo mi/Gget_fpreg.lo mi/Gset_fpreg.lo
mi/Gset_caching_policy.lo dwarf/Gexpr.lo dwarf/Gfde.lo dwarf/Gparser.lo
dwarf/Gpe.lo dwarf/Gstep.lo dwarf/Gfind_proc_info-lsb.lo
x86/Gcreate_addr_space.lo x86/Gget_save_loc.lo x86/Gglobal.lo x86/Ginit.lo
x86/Ginit_local.lo x86/Ginit_remote.lo x86/Gis_signal_frame.lo
x86/Gget_proc_info.lo x86/Gregs.lo x86/Gresume.lo x86/Gstep.lo
x86/Gfetch_proc_info_post.lo
libtool: link: `os-linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
make[5]: *** [libunwind-x86.la] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/aedil/build_farm/frysk_dist/frysk/frysk-imports/libunwind-i386/src'

Steps to reproduce:

1. Checkout a fresh tree
2. mkdir build; cd build; ../frysk/autogen.sh
3. make
4. make dist
5. cd /elsewhere
6. tar -zxpSf <distfile>
7. cd <distdir>
8. ./configure
9. make

-- 
           Summary: Building the tree created with 'make dist' fails in
                    libunwind-i386
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4291

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 28 08:55:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:55:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070328085540.31569.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-28 09:55 -------
The problem here is that frysk.rt.RunState throws a hissy fit when it sees any
addObservation failing:

  public void addFailed (Object o, Throwable w)
  {
    w.printStackTrace();
    stateProc.requestAbandonAndRunEvent(new RequestStopEvent(Manager.eventLoop)\
);
    System.exit(1);
  }

The TaskState really cannot help that the request for an observer addition was
done just at the moment the Task was about to be destroyed.

Is there anything the TaskState can do to help RunState recover in this case?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 28 12:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4293] New: NullpointerException from StackFrame.getSymbol(FryskGUI)
Message-ID: <20070328130159.4293.mark@klomp.org>

Trying to "Quick Debug" a process that rapidly creates/destroyes threads (like
the thread_test example from bug #4147) often results in a stream of
NullPointerExceptions on the console from which FryskGUI was launched:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.rt.StackFrame.getSymbol(FryskGui)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.setSubprogram(FryskGui)
   at frysk.cli.hpd.SymTab.setFrames(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow.generateProcStackTrace(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindow$LockObserver$32.run(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.glib.CustomEvents.runEvents(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: NullpointerException from StackFrame.getSymbol(FryskGUI)
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4293

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Wed Mar 28 12:09:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:09:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070328120944.6344.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mark at klomp dot org  2007-03-28 13:09 -------
As a workaround for now I just treat Tasks falling through addFailed() as if
they did an updateExecuted() so they disappear from the list of Tasks being
waited on.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 16:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329165310.522.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |4296


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 16:53:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:53:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4296] New: Improve display of proc/thread life time
Message-ID: <20070329175309.4296.swagiaal@redhat.com>

Add a way to indicate the life time of a thread/proc:
suggestions:
   - draw the life time area brighter than the dead area.
   - cut off the line in the button with a couple black ticks
* see what project management software does to represent a lifetime of a task
(gant).

-- 
           Summary: Improve display of proc/thread life time
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
OtherBugsDependingO 1632
             nThis:


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4296

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 16:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1632] [tracker] Event Viewer (a.k.a. the monitor view)
In-Reply-To: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029170301.1632.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329165405.1806.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1632 depends on bug 4243, which changed state.

Bug 4243 Summary: Removed Porcs/Threads are not handled
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4243

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 16:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4243] Removed Porcs/Threads are not handled
In-Reply-To: <20070321203058.4243.swagiaal@redhat.com>
References: <20070321203058.4243.swagiaal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329165403.1784.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-29 17:54 -------
Fixed on 2007-03-26 17:13
Enhancements requested moved to:
  http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4296

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4243

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 17:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (swagiaal at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329170205.11570.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com  2007-03-29 18:02 -------
isnt System.exit(1) kind of harsh.
It sounds like TaskState had a good reason for the add to fail, so RunState
should handle it and move on.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 19:54:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (pmuldoon at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:54:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329195438.16403.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pmuldoon at redhat dot com  2007-03-29 20:54 -------
Can I suggest using never using System.exit in any case from the UI? Suggest using

Gui.quitFrysk()

which is a static method. It shuts down the GTK eventloop with mainQuit.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pmuldoon at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Thu Mar 29 19:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4174] Frysk blows up with heavily threading programs.
In-Reply-To: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20070308215939.4174.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070329195915.22660.qmail@sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From mcvet at redhat dot com  2007-03-29 20:59 -------
Well this is in RT so potentially it could be just fhpd running, but the 
System.exit was just an oversight - there are certainly better ways of handling 
that problem than just quitting. I'll look into a better solution.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4174

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 12:33:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:33:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4297] New: session manager prints nullpointer
Message-ID: <20070330133342.4297.mcvet@redhat.com>

Every fifth, or sixth time I start up Frysk and click "new", this gets printed 
to console:

java.lang.NullPointerException
   at frysk.gui.monitor.ProcWiseDataModel.unFilterData(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.druid.CreateFryskSessionDruid.unFilterData(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.druid.CreateFryskSessionDruid.setNewSessionMode(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.SessionManagerDialog$3.buttonEvent(FryskGui)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.fireButtonEvent(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Button.handleClick(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.gtk_main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at org.gnu.gtk.Gtk.main(libgtkjava-2.8.so)
   at frysk.gui.Gui.gui(FryskGui)
   at frysk.gui.FryskGui.main(FryskGui)

-- 
           Summary: session manager prints nullpointer
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4297

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 14:59:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:59:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4298] New: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval
Message-ID: <20070330155935.4298.mark@klomp.org>

Mike Cvet reported the following in bug #3705:

{frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceTask@3967ceb5,pid=26079,tid=26079,state=blockedContinue} 
in state "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval

frysk.proc.State.unhandled(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.TaskState.handleRemoval(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Task.performRemoval(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceProc.sendRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHost.sendRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.LinuxPtraceHostState$1.handleRefresh(FryskGui)
frysk.proc.Host$1.execute(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.runEventLoop(FryskGui)
frysk.event.EventLoop.run(FryskGui)
frysk.gui.Gui$3.run(FryskGui)
java.lang.Thread.run(libgcj.so.7rh)

This should not happen (tm).
This means a task got killed and disappeared while we thought it we got it
blocked. We only handle such a case if we are in the detached state.

-- 
           Summary: Unexplained "BlockedSignal" did not handle handleRemoval
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org
                CC: mcvet at redhat dot com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4298

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 15:00:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:00:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3346] [tracker] Stepping
In-Reply-To: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
References: <20061011175449.3346.mcvet@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070330150023.920.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3346 depends on bug 3705, which changed state.

Bug 3705 Summary: state "Attached.WaitForUnblock" did not handle handleRemoval
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3705

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3346

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 15:25:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mark at klomp dot org)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/4299] New: System.exit() usage
Message-ID: <20070330162509.4299.mark@klomp.org>

As pointed out in a comment on bug #4174 System.exit() should not be used to
bail out in bad situations because it doesn't give the gui or the fhpd (or
anything else using frysk as library) a chance to properly notify the user what
happened (and clean things up).

The following classes use System.exit() at this time:

- frysk.rt.RunState
- frysk.util.FCatch
- frysk.util.StacktraceAction
- frysk.util.CoredumpAction
- frysk.gui.srcwin.SourceWindowFactory
- frysk.gui.common.Messages
- frysk.gui.Gui (this is probably the only class that should use it)

-- 
           Summary: System.exit() usage
           Product: frysk
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: frysk-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
        ReportedBy: mark at klomp dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4299

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 19:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/1633] [tracker] source view / debugger view
In-Reply-To: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20051029172637.1633.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070330190232.11163.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 1633 depends on bug 4214, which changed state.

Bug 4214 Summary: selecting two processes gets two source windows
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4214

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1633

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


From sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org  Fri Mar 30 19:02:00 2007
From: sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org (mcvet at redhat dot com)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug general/3361] [tracker] fcatch - print stacktrace from exiting process
In-Reply-To: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
References: <20061012194811.3361.cagney@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070330190151.10762.qmail@sourceware.org>



-- 
Bug 3361 depends on bug 4300, which changed state.

Bug 4300 Summary: FCatch doesn't handle inferior arguments properly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4300

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3361

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.