Fwd: Anton Baltser, bug with libdebuginfod

[anton baltser]

Yes, it works! Thanks for your help!

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023, 18:43 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:

> Hi Anton,
>
> On Sun, 2023-07-30 at 22:05 +0300, anton baltser wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick response.
> > I did:
> > $ ./configure --prefix=/usr                \
> > >               --disable-debuginfod         \
> > >               --enable-libdebuginfod=dummy \
> > >               --libdir=/libm
> > $ make install :
> > Making install in tests
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'.
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-data-am'.
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'.
> >  /usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/include/elfutils'
> >  /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 version.h '/usr/include/elfutils'
> [...]
>
> So this will also install debuginfod.h  under /usr/include/elfutils
> Is that what you are asking about? Is it not doing that for you?
>
> > $ make check :
> >
> ============================================================================
> > Testsuite summary for elfutils 0.189
> >
> ============================================================================
> > # TOTAL: 236
> > # PASS:  232
> > # SKIP:  4
> > # XFAIL: 0
> > # FAIL:  0
> > # XPASS: 0
> > # ERROR: 0
> >
> ============================================================================
> > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-am'.
> >
> > Is that right result?
>
> That looks correct yes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>