[PATCH] backends: add checks for _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ on loongarch
Hengqi Chen
hengqi.chen@gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 15:45:52 GMT 2023
Hi, Youling
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 11:19 AM Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> Add handling of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_.
>
> Before applying the patch:
> $ ./src/elflint --gnu-ld ./src/elflint
> section [35] '.symtab': _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol value 0x68548
> does not match .got.plt section address 0x68238
>
> After applying the patch:
> $ ./src/elflint --gnu-ld ./src/elflint
> No errors
>
> Signed-off-by: Liwei Ge <geliwei@openanolis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
> ---
> backends/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
> backends/loongarch_init.c | 1 +
> backends/loongarch_symbol.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/backends/ChangeLog b/backends/ChangeLog
> index 81f08314..41071953 100644
> --- a/backends/ChangeLog
> +++ b/backends/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +2023-04-01 Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
> + * loongarch_init.c (loongarch_init): Hook check_special_symbol.
> + * loongarch_symbol.c (loongarch_check_special_symbol): New function.
> +
> 2023-02-07 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
>
> * libebl_CPU.h (dwarf_peeled_die_type): Explicitly handle
> diff --git a/backends/loongarch_init.c b/backends/loongarch_init.c
> index 59d8cc3d..b641b07f 100644
> --- a/backends/loongarch_init.c
> +++ b/backends/loongarch_init.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ loongarch_init (Elf *elf __attribute__ ((unused)),
> loongarch_init_reloc (eh);
> HOOK (eh, reloc_simple_type);
> HOOK (eh, machine_flag_check);
> + HOOK (eh, check_special_symbol);
>
> return eh;
> }
> diff --git a/backends/loongarch_symbol.c b/backends/loongarch_symbol.c
> index 43306ab8..5ce55bad 100644
> --- a/backends/loongarch_symbol.c
> +++ b/backends/loongarch_symbol.c
> @@ -79,3 +79,38 @@ loongarch_machine_flag_check (GElf_Word flags)
> return ((flags &~ (EF_LARCH_ABI_MODIFIER_MASK
> | EF_LARCH_OBJABI_V1)) == 0);
> }
> +
> +/* Check whether given symbol's st_value and st_size are OK despite failing
> + normal checks. */
> +bool
> +loongarch_check_special_symbol (Elf *elf, const GElf_Sym *sym,
> + const char *name, const GElf_Shdr *destshdr)
> +{
> + if (name != NULL
> + && strcmp (name, "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_") == 0)
> + {
> + size_t shstrndx;
> + if (elf_getshdrstrndx (elf, &shstrndx) != 0)
> + return false;
> + const char *sname = elf_strptr (elf, shstrndx, destshdr->sh_name);
> + if (sname != NULL
> + && (strcmp (sname, ".got") == 0 || strcmp (sname, ".got.plt") == 0))
> + {
> + Elf_Scn *scn = NULL;
> + while ((scn = elf_nextscn (elf, scn)) != NULL)
> + {
> + GElf_Shdr shdr_mem;
> + GElf_Shdr *shdr = gelf_getshdr (scn, &shdr_mem);
> + if (shdr != NULL)
> + {
> + sname = elf_strptr (elf, shstrndx, shdr->sh_name);
> + if (sname != NULL && strcmp (sname, ".got") == 0)
> + return (sym->st_value >= shdr->sh_addr
> + && sym->st_value < shdr->sh_addr + shdr->sh_size);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> --
> 2.37.1
>
I've tested this locally, but still remains one error:
section [34] '.symtab': _DYNAMIC symbol size 0 does not match dynamic
segment size 480
Cheers,
---
Hengqi
More information about the Elfutils-devel
mailing list