[PATCH] define SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG section rather than error out

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi Timm,

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 14:44 +0100, Timm Bäder wrote:
> any update on this? I see that SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG is still not in upstream
> glibc. Are you working on that, Navin?
> 
> As for the checks, I'm not sure we can do anything here since elfutils
> can't know whether a symbol is rightfully marked as address-significant.

I tried to lookup some more information about SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG, but
couldn't really find much. There is this comment about it from the
binutils maintainers:
https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23817#c1

I would suggest following that and wait till the design is fixed before
trying to handle SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG.

Cheers,

Mark