eCos uSTL 1.3 port for review

Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 13:55:00 GMT 2009


On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 04:25:11PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:44:16PM +0300, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> > Uwe Kindler wrote:
> > > It would be really great, If you could investigate a little bit more, 
> > > what causes the SIGSEG for synthetic target. Would you be so kind to run 
> > > the new snprintf_c99.c test on synthetic target when C99 compliance 
> > > activated to check if my vfnprintf() patch is working properly?
> >  
> > Uwe, 
> > 
> > snprintf_c99 test passed successfully on synth. It seems that I should
> > grep all  #if linux in ustl and look on that. I will try to rebuild ustl
> > with assertions and will try to re-run the tests. I'll let you know what
> > I will get then.
> 
> Hm, Uwe, SIGSEG occured on a call of a destructor in vsnprintf.cxx (it's
> not your source). The uSTL test run on synthetic target with this dirty
> tweak. Do you have any thoughts?
 
With this patch both set of tests libc/stdio and cxx/ustl passed
successfully on synthetic target.

Sergei
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vsnprintf.cxx.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-patches/attachments/20090806/68942bd8/attachment.bin>


More information about the Ecos-patches mailing list