eCos uSTL port patch for review

[cetoni GmbH - Uwe Kindler]

Hi John,

 > stdint.h is a C99 header. Adding it seems harmless to me, but to what
 > extent should we continue to add C99 features piecemeal to the existing
 > eCos C library which is based on C89? Is there a specific version of
 > stdint.h that would be preferable to ensure maximum compatibility? I
 > would like to hear Jifl's opinion on this. Jifl?

the uSTL package requires the stdint.h file because it uses the types 
from this header file.

I would leave this file in the uSTL package for the moment and as soon 
as another eCos package also requires stdint.h we could move it to the 
libc library.

Regards, Uwe