Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets

[Sergei Gavrikov]

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:27:31AM +0200, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:57:47PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > I will do. One question, Is it normal to have upcase(x) there? in
> > > > dirname? What is a practic?
> > > 
> > > Humm, lower case is more normal in directory names. However CDL
> > > properties generally use upper case.
> >  
> > Reworked: 3 flash packages became one: CYGPKG_DEVS_FLASH_ARM_OLPCX2294.
> > dirname is lower cased dev/flash/arm/olpcx2294. Andrew, please, remove
> > previous patches. I fix CFLAGS for arm-eabi and  did refresh redboot's
> > ecm files. There are redboot_RAM.ecm, redboot_ROM.ecm and minimalist
> > redboot_ROM_minimal.ecm (no flash, eth, just serial) in the 'misc' dir.
> > for the targets. I put all in one patch and new ecos.db.tail as well. Is
> > it okay? 
> 
> The ports have been committed. Attached are the actual patches.
> 
> Please could you spend some time rewriting the LCD driver to use
> HAL_WRITE_UINT?() macros instead of casted volatile pointers.

Andrew

I clean up olpce2294_misc.c LCD code from not-portable I/O macros and
test new code on OLPC-E2294. It's okay. Pease, apply a patch against
CVS.

Thank you,

Sergei
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: olpcx2294_hal.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 11701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-patches/attachments/20081123/d5a5a7c6/attachment.bin>