at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot

[Jonathan Larmour]

Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> 
>>On Monday 08 March 2004 13:17, Thomas Koeller wrote:
>>
>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'll hold off reverting the relevant parts of the patch (i.e. return bits
>>>>back to the platform HALs) straight away so people have a chance to
>>>>comment.
>>>
>>>Jonathan,
>>>
>>>do you think you need much longer to make a decision as to whether this
>>>patch should be reverted or not? As I wrote earlier, I have a couple of
>>>platform HAL packages that would need to be adopted if this change were to
>>>stay, but of course I do not want to do that if things are likely to be
>>>changed back later. But if I dont, I cannot update my repository.
>>>
>>>FWIW, I agree with you that most of the cdl options in question should be
>>>in the platfrom HAl for maximum flexibility. The platform HAL packages I am
>>>maintaining are not exactly like one of the evaluation boards. Some of them
>>>have additional I/O channels besides the two serial ports, and they do in
>>>fact use a special startup mode, which is a variant of the ROMRAM mode that
>>>leaves .rodata in rom.
>>>
>>>tk
>>
>>Hi Jani and Jonathan,
>>
>>I created a patch that undoes Jani's changes that broke all my HAL packages.
> 
> 
> OK. Time for action...... Jani, any comments or should i just commit
> this patch.

Yes, go ahead.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine