operator precedence in standalone eth_drv.c

[Gary Thomas]

On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 01:29, Jani Monoses wrote:
> I found this and remembered I had posted it before
> 

Yes, *long* before, during the very dark days...

> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-07/msg00149.html

It looks correct to me.  Go ahead and commit, along with a ChangeLog

n.b. because there is only one bit used in that word, the effect is
unchanged even though the precedence is wrong :-)

-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates