strata erase and prog fixes

[Gary Thomas]

On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 06:11, Jani Monoses wrote:
> For the bootblock case there's an error determining whether a block is
> among the first blocks or not because one of the operands in the
> comparison is given in bytes (BLOCKSIZE) and the other in flash_t.
> Fix needed for early bootblock flashes and more recent wireless stratas.
> Also starting with synchronous strata (part K) erase cycles need to
> specify the block address in the first cycle of the command not just any
> address. Program commands need to do the same with the word address.
> Since earlier parts take any address they'll work with this change.
> The status register alsoo needs to be read form the block being worked
> on. 

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates