hal_idle_thread_action on ARM

[Daniel Néri]

Nick Garnett <nickg@ecoscentric.com> writes:

> This patch seem over-complicated for what it does. And defining
> hal_arm_var_idle_thread_action() in hal_arch.h is not right.
>
> The way we have done this kind of thing in the past, with interrupt
> controller macros, cache macros etc. is to do something like this:

OK, fair enough. I'll have another go at it. The names var_arch.h and
plf_arch.h look awkward to me, but since they already exist in
e.g. the MIPS HAL I guess it's OK.


Regards,

-- 
Daniel Neri
dne@mayonnaise.net