Minor AT91 fix

[Jonathan Larmour]

Daniel Néri wrote:
>     Hello,
> 
> There's not much to say about the patch below,

Thanks, applied.

> except that I think
> there should really be some translation where eCos interrupt
> priorities are suitably mapped to hardware interrupt levels.
 >
> E.g. using the generic 16x5x UART driver on AT91 gives a problem
> because, for some reason, 99 was chosen as the interrupt priority
> level.

Yes :-|. I think the attached patch is the only reasonable way forward. I 
rather hope 4 is a sensible alternative... I doubt 99 is.

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ser16x5xintlevel.patch
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-patches/attachments/20030716/8869233a/attachment.ksh>