Welcome to sources.redhat.com

[Andrew Lunn]

> I heard a good definition of a trivial patch as a patch that the
> most sadistic reviewer you know would still have no grounds of
> objecting to :-). The most extremely trivial patches sometimes don't
> even deserve a ChangeLog entry or patch to ecos-patches, but err on
> the side of caution for now. Otherwise, all changes should have a
> ChangeLog entry.

As you all know, my spelling/English is terrible. Please feel free to
correct ChangeLog entries, comments, etc. I have no problems with
this. Being dyslexic, i don't notice my errors. Such changes i think
fall into the trivial category. 

     Andrew