[ECOS] Re: eCos arm-eabi GNU tools - test release 4.6.2-20120125

Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 07:25:00 GMT 2012

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Grant Edwards wrote:

> Now I've got -Wno-write-strings (as seen above), but I still get 139
> warnings, and 88 of them are because of dereferencing type-punned
> pointers by bsd_tcpip files.
> It still looks to me like the bsd_tcpip cdl needs to add
> -fno-strict-aliasing to CFLAGS.
> After doing that, I'm down to 51 warnings.
> 39 are variables that are set but not used -- almost all in bsd_tcpip
> files.
> Most of the rest are signed/unsigned mismatches for pointer arguments.
> Again, almost all are in bsd_tcpip code.

Grant, I found what opens Pandora's box thanking your questions on ipv6
stack :-) That is ipv6 code! As I could understand you include it and I
used only ipv4 stack when I tested new toolchain. With the option

  cdl_option CYGPKG_NET_INET6 {
      user_value 1

I got the same results on warnings as you have.

BTW, current and stable GCC-4.3.2 does produce something about 10
warnings for the same build.

Thanks for your reports and testing. It seems to me we have to check all
changes on warnings policy since GCC-4.3. I mean


At the least for 4.5 I saw

  * The infrastructure for optimizing based on restrict qualified
    pointers has been rewritten and should result in code generation
    improvements.  Optimizations based on restrict qualified pointers
    are now also available when using -fno-strict-aliasing.

As I could see we forced using '-fno-strict-aliasing' option only for
libm eCos package for some toolchains.


Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list