[ECOS] Re: Looking in a future: VCS for eCos 3.0

[Dave Lawrence]

[snip]
>> SVN is stable, fast, secure, works without problems through routers,
>> directory structures are handled more efficiently than with CVS, file
> 
> I've not seen a compliment "stable" for any VCS. Most of them are marked
> either "active developed" or "maintained but" in Wikipedia comparison:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software

I don't think "actively developed" can be read to mean "unstable".
We've been using SVN for 3 years and in my experience it is very stable.
If you do decide to stay with the client-server model I would definately
reccommend SVN.


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss