[ECOS] Re: "PANIC: zinit: Out of memory" when num sockets increased to 64

Gary Thomas gary@mlbassoc.com
Wed Apr 9 12:08:00 GMT 2008

Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-04-08, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>>> So there's well over 15MB of unallocated RAM. That seems like
>>> more than enough RAM to handle 64 sockets.
>>> Why am I getting a panic on startup?
>> The network stack has its own memory pool. See
> Several other people seem to have tripped over this bug.  IMO,
> the problem is that the default value takes the number of
> sockets into account, and the description claims that value is
> guaranteed to allow the network stack to start up.
> One presumes that the minimum value required for stack startup
> could be calculated at configure time based on the max number
> of sockets.  Since that isn't being done, should I submit a
> patch that would change the description so that it doesn't say
> that it is?

Or, better yet, improve the CDL so it behaves as folks expect :-)

Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world

Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list