[ECOS] AT91 bad IRQ/FIQ priority handling?
Tue Sep 14 17:03:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 06:43:18PM +0200, Andrea Michelotti wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> I did the check: all at91 targets have an AIC line 0 dedicated to FIQ (in
> these platforms FIQ is an external interrupt ).
> Then I think we don't need a CDL entry, a constant should be enough, but I
> don't know the appropriate header where to put a constant like
> CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_FIQ 0 for all at91 targets.
Zero is probably not the correct value, it needs to fit in with the
other constants. The files you need to change are:
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss