[ECOS] RE : [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
Tue Mar 16 15:26:00 GMT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:57 PM
> To: Vincent Catros
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:23:57PM +0100, Vincent Catros wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm about to deliver an FTP server.
> > This server has been originaly developped for RTEMs and therefore
> > released under RTEMs licence.
> There appears to be 4 RTEMS license. Which exactly is this FTP server
> license under?
In fact, licence terms were not included into the files I downloaded.
I have contacted the original contributor that said to me the package
was released under "RTEMs licence".
Regarding the name of four licences, I assumed it was "Primary licence".
Then I have included RTEMs "Primary licence" terms into files and
submited those files to the original contributor for agreement.
He gave me this agreement.
But I can't switch to eCos licence as, I think, all contributors should
give their agreement.
Is this a problem to include files into eCos distribution?
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss