[ECOS] Re: EB40LS ping_test problem

[Daniel Néri]

RandyLin@mxic.com.tw writes:

> ASSERT FAIL: <1>at91_misc.c[243]hal_interrupt_set_level() Invalid level

[snip]

> Is this a bug? hal_interrupt_set_level accept level between 1~7

Yes, interrupt priority level 0 is valid on AT91. A fix was committed
two months ago:

  http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2003-07/msg00025.html


Regards
--Daniel


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss