[ECOS] eCos developpement process?

David N. Welton davidw@dedasys.com
Fri Nov 21 10:09:00 GMT 2003

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> Big patches take more work and so tend to take longer. Ugly patches
> generally either get rejected and requested to be re-written, or we
> fix them ourselves.  Some patches get stuck for legal reasons. Some
> patches get included fast because it interests a particular
> maintainers. Some patches get delayed because no maintainer is
> particularly interested in the patch.

It's almost completely slipped my mind at this point, because I
haven't touched eCos since then, but which combination of these
factors best describe the floppy driver that I had posted?

David N. Welton
   Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
     Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
   Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/

Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list