[ECOS] Deciphering ISO C (Chap 184.108.40.206 - Pointers)
Mon Nov 10 22:16:00 GMT 2003
> cyg_uint16* res_16;
> cyg_uint16* p_16;
> cyg_uint16 u_16;
> p_16 = 0x0u;
> u_16 = 0x0u;'
> res_16 = (p_16 + 0x555u);
> The above code yields res_16 == 0xaaa
> I was sort of hoping for 0x555 instead...
> Altering the addition line to this:
> res_16 = (cyg_uint16*)(u_16 + 0x555);
> corrects the problem...
Pointer arithmetic. Take the following example bits of code....(which probably has many syntax errors etc)
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
char * pfoo = &foo;
char * pa = & foo1;
*(pfoo+i) = pfoo[i];
*(pa+i) = a[i];
Its a contrived way of copying foo into foo1 and a into a1.
You want *(pfoo+i) to be byte by byte since you are copying characters, but
you want *(pa+i) to be word by word since its copying ints.
res_16 = (p_16 + 0x555u);
p_16 is of type cyg_uint16 *, so you are adding 0x555 16bit words, ie 0xaaa.
res_16 = (cyg_uint16*)(u_16 + 0x555);
u_16 is a plain cyg_uint16, so its not pointer arithmetic, its normal
arithmetic which you then cast to a pointer afterwards.
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss