[ECOS] processes vs threads (MMU protection)
Armando Visconti
armando.visconti@st.com
Mon Jul 21 10:02:00 GMT 2003
I would like to ask to the mantainers why the work
done by 3G lab on 'memory protection' has not
been included in eCos v2.0.
Is not stable enough?
Don't you think it would be great for a MMU
based system to get benefit from a memory
protected OS ?
Any plan in this direction?
Thanks for any comment,
Armando.
--
+--------------------------------------------------+
Armando Visconti Cellular: +39 340 9239426
SW Engineer Fax: +39 02 93519702
Printer Division Work: +39 02 93519683
ST Microelectronics <armando.visconti@st.com>
via Tolomeo, 1
Cornaredo (MI) - 20010
ITALY
+--------------------------------------------------+
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: armando.visconti.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 317 bytes
Desc: Card for Armando Visconti
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-discuss/attachments/20030721/3cd84dcb/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss
mailing list