[ECOS] RE: AT91 patches

Jonathan Larmour jifl@eCosCentric.com
Thu Jan 30 15:29:00 GMT 2003


Jani Monoses wrote:
> Jifl, Thomas
> can't the AT91 patch be merged without the flash changes initially?
> The existing EB40 is not using it's first half of the flash anyway
> being reserved for angel.

Yes, as I evidently didn't say clearly enough here:

>>>I can do the rest of the eb40 port (and probably will soon), 
>>>but without 
>>>the flash driver, it's somewhat crippled in terms of redboot support.

:-)

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric       http://www.eCosCentric.com/       <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss



More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list