[ECOS] RE: AT91 patches

[Koeller, T.]

Yes, of course, those two things are totally unrelated.

Thomas
----------------------------------------------- 
Thomas Koeller, Software Development 

Basler Vision Technologies 
An der Strusbek 60-62 
22926 Ahrensburg 
Germany 

Tel +49 (4102) 463-390 
Fax +49 (4102) 463-46390

mailto:Thomas.Koeller@baslerweb.com 
http://www.baslerweb.com 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jani Monoses [mailto:jani@iv.ro]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
> 
> 
> Jifl, Thomas
> can't the AT91 patch be merged without the flash changes initially?
> The existing EB40 is not using it's first half of the flash anyway
> being reserved for angel.
> So IMHO ther would be a more logical layout for other AT91 variants to
> be worked on and no regression introduced since the EB40 
> flash is not multiple sector
> aware AFAIK.
> 
> Jani.

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss