[ECOS] ecos license question.
Jonathan Larmour
jifl@eCosCentric.com
Sat Jan 18 07:03:00 GMT 2003
Fabrice Gautier wrote:
>>
>>Not with the MPL. If you change something, then someone might
>>be entitled to those changes, but that someone isn't necessarily
>>you :-).
>
>
> Gah? If _I_ change something _I_ may not be entitled to those changes ?
>
> My point was that if I receive a binary, I'm entitled to the eCos source
> code that is inside the binary no matter what license the binary falls under
> (I believe MPL section 3.2 says that). One things that differ may be the
> means you get the source. When I get that source code I get it in one of the
> 3 options, as the distributor choose.
Aargh. I've just looked it up and this is one of the areas the MPL and
RHEPL differ - I had thought they were more alike than that. Sigh - we've
been talking at cross purposes a little. My bad, sorry.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss
mailing list