[ECOS] ecos license question.

Jonathan Larmour jifl@eCosCentric.com
Wed Jan 15 21:42:00 GMT 2003


Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
>
> - you might mention the fact that the specific eCos 2.0 license is considered
>   a GPL-compatible, Free SW license, as described on the page on the FSF site
>   (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html)

I didn't know we were listed there. They must have been pro-active after 
our earlier discussions with them. Now noted.

> - :s/licence/license/ ? 

Oops, we accidentally spelt it correctly in a few places, true. Now 
correctly broken in the US way ;).

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric       http://www.eCosCentric.com/       <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss



More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list