[ECOS] ecos license question.
Wed Jan 15 21:42:00 GMT 2003
Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
> - you might mention the fact that the specific eCos 2.0 license is considered
> a GPL-compatible, Free SW license, as described on the page on the FSF site
I didn't know we were listed there. They must have been pro-active after
our earlier discussions with them. Now noted.
> - :s/licence/license/ ?
Oops, we accidentally spelt it correctly in a few places, true. Now
correctly broken in the US way ;).
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss