[ECOS] Licensing of OpenSource code and eCos
Jonathan Larmour
jifl@eCosCentric.com
Mon Sep 30 12:37:00 GMT 2002
Iztok Zupet wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 20:43, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
>>The licence is very unlikely to change. It was difficult enough to arrange
>>the current version! :-)
>
>
> Very suitable for embedded use, anyway. But according to my talk with
> FSF (about booting RedBoot from DoC, partly cc-ed to Jifl) they seem to
> dislike the linking exception thus making it harder for the eCos
> community to port fully GPL-ed code to eCos.
What we should probably set up at some point is a separate part of the
website devoted to contributions which are fully GPLd. Maybe even a
separate CVS module, although that is more difficult with the way ecos.db
is structured.
We did choose the licence knowing full well that it would cause problems
integrating GPLd code into the codebase, but at least *users* can use GPLd
code.
Jifl
--
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss
mailing list