[ECOS] Who's maintaining CVS

[Daniel Leu]

>
>>I strongly support the idea of a test farm. The CVS repository
>>should remain under tight control, because the quality of the
>>code base is crucial to the success of ecos. Although I tested
>>patches I very much dislike the idea of checking them into
>>the repository without them having been reviewed by others
>>independently.
>
>Indeed that is one of the reasons for delays in patch approval. All 
>patches are reviewed by hand. And indeed patches rarely get checked in 
>unmodified. Due to lack of hardware availability, they are not likely to 
>be tested unless the reviewer does possess the hardware.

Jifl,

I'm using Thomas 'modular AT91 HAL' without problems... We have our own 
board package based on his AT91 HAL and I'm waiting to see Thomas' changes 
appear in CVS so I can send you the patch for our platform :)

'hope this makes your live a little easier.

Regards,
Daniel


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss